User talk:Sillstaw

Welcome!

Hello, Sillstaw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Phroziac (talk) 01:19, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Watch[edit]

I see you added some misinformation to our Watch article, yet most of your edits appear to be useful. Are you testing Wikipedia? We'd prefer that you didn't. We now have to treat all your edits with greater suspicion than most.-gadfium 19:56, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Response to "Watch"[edit]

That was a stupid thing I did, and I'm sorry I added the misinforming word, mainly because it puts me under suspicion, but also because I enjoy being here and don't want to get banned or put under suspicion. If I can help it (and I will try to), I will avoid vandalizing anything again.

Sorry I have to put it under a new subject, too; I don't know how to respond to the post. All apologies. Sillstaw 22:54, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re: LGBT[edit]

It claims under your categories that you're an LGBT Wikipedian. Am I wrong in assuming that this would conflict with your apparent belief in Scientology? Is it just vandalism? Thanks. Sillstaw 22:18, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sillstaw: Hah, no, it isn't vandalism; as I am sure you can see from the page history, I added the category myself. :) Actually, the subject of Scientology doesn't conflict with my sexual orientation; although some of L. Ron Hubbard's earlier works refer to being gay as a "sexual abberation" (for example, in his book Science of Survival) his later works were neutral on the matter. Also, in Scientology the maxim "what is true for you is true for you" is considered paramount; one evaluates for oneself what is true and what is not, which I have done - and there is certainly no prohibition on homosexuality in the subject, far from it, one is free to make one's own decisions on one's own behaviour. I do hope this clarifies the matter for you. Best regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) (e-mail) (cabal) 23:23, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]