User talk:Sloth monkey

Speedy deletion nomination of Massimo Mazzucco

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Massimo Mazzucco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Toffanin (talk) 12:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

L _ N _ U:SM / Tm / Ti / SO / C _ A:RK / A:FOL / A:J _ UT:SM / 1 / 2 / 3 || U:WJ _ UT:WJ || FOL _ T:FOL _ FOL:H

mark of the monkey

mark of the monkey

the sloth_monkey

Phil Schneider

Sloth Monkey,

I just learned of certain challanges to the Phil Schneider entry that were posted about a month ago. Do you want to address any corrections that might be appropriate, or should I? Thanks, LuciusMichael

ORME

Please see User talk:OlavN. -- RHaworth 13:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

wooooah!!!

dyude!, u sew tootally wobbed mall dis von dah perple, bewk dat vis at dah barnes! but seriousley!, who ever bought yew dah bewk me wauld mailith dem a double chilli cheese berger von HARD-E!s yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep yep NONDE DESKA!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.56.145.36 (talk) 01:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC).

PMIDs

Please do not remove PubMed IDs from articles, as you did with DNA these are a useful part of references. TimVickers 15:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

That was a misunderstanding. An editing conflict occured and erased changes that I was oblivious to. Just trying to make a minor change. Linked some words to wiki articles. sloth_monkey 06:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:United States Of Europe Poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:United States Of Europe Poster.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Wassup d00d

Hi User:Sloth monkey, I noticed you archived an interesting article relating to the so-called Flower of Life geometric pattern. You will undoubtedly be cognisant of the connection between that geometric pattern and the Time Cube 4-corner creation principle.

May I enquire: do you approve of the notorious and persistent censorship and suppression of the 4-corner harmonic Cubic truth that has occurred within the scope of the Time Cube article and other related articles, on a nearly-continuous basis since late 2003? More Wikipedians should revolt against the Cubeless tyranny that enslaves this website. Do you think that Jimbo Wales might be a 1-corner Cube-hating singularity overlord?

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.28.8.20 (talk) 06:12, 27 March 2007 (UTC). —User identified as Suring!

who are you? i immediate suspicion is that you are suring. ..however your message was much more coherent than normal suring ramblings. but i suspect this may be a ploy by the devious suring to deceive me. ...your IP resolves to sunax7-b020.dialup.optusnet.com.au, which I believe means you're using a dialup connection in australia. ........WHO ARE YOU!?! ps. Yes. I think that Jimbo Wales might be a 1-corner Cube-hating singularity overlord. sloth_monkey 20:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Sloth monkey, no I am not acquainted nor associated with this "Suring" character to whom you refer--but in fact, I am a proponent of NATURE'S HARMONIC TIME CUBE principle, expounded on such websites as TimeCube.com and CubicAO.tk.

Yes I think we should probably be suspicious of Jimbo Wales. Perhaps he has had a hand in the anti-Cubic conspiracies that have arisen on this site. And indeed, Nature's Harmonic Time Cube is the key, the agent and the pathway that shall lead us to human salvation.

You're so full of it. crazy suring bastard. sloth_monkey 21:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Mfkzt

"Somebody wrote about it on the web" is not adequate. Please cite sources published by a third party. IPSOS (talk) 03:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Jota

Hi. Regarding User:Sloth_monkey/Jota_(Freemasonry), you claim "various Masonic reference works which may be found in public libraries" but do you actually have specific sources? As it is now, only Maxwell is a reference. I have yet to see The Illuminati by Chris Everard--have you? -Eep² 03:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

I cited my direct source of the material which was Jordan Maxwell, a historian, speaking in the video titled The Illuminati. Yes I have seen the video. --sloth_monkey 20:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Er, no. I mean, have you researched the "various Masonic reference works" or did you just take Maxwell's word for it? A single source is what's referred to as an primary source, and is not considered a reliable source. I'm not trying to come off negatively, as I am genuinely interested in Maxwell's work--I have edited his and other related articles a lot lately, and have come under fire from other wikipedians/admins regarding Wikipedia policy. If you want the article to have a chance of being restored, you'll need to find more reliable sources. Keeping deleted content on a user page (or subpage) is against Wikipedia rules--I recently had my user page deleted for that very reason (see User_talk:Eep²#Userpage), so this is just a friendly warning that your subpage may be targeted for deletion (not by me though). Also, do you have a link to the video? -Eep² 08:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Here's The Illuminati Vol. 2 on YouTube. I believe the video with Maxwell is in Volume 1. Volume 1 can probably be found on ISOhunt, using uTorrent client software and the BitTorrent network. No I haven't checked into this Jota thing at all other than what Maxwell said in the video. sloth_monkey 03:39, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Flower of Life

Hi,

I am rather new to adding information to Wikipedia, so please forgive me if I do not, or have not followed the right protocol.

I note that you have amended the corrections that I added to this page in the light of the photographic evidence that I have in respect of the Flower of Life pattern in the Osirion.

I am happy to make this photograph more widely available and am looking at the moment to try to get it fully enhanced so that the text can be deciphered.

There is no doubt that the text is Ancient Greek and possibly Archaic Greek. The text is also clearly in the same coloring as the FOL patterns, of which there are at least 5 major circles plus some smaller symbols.

It seems to me strange therefore that the statement "The FOL symbol is thousands of years old" should be allowed to stand unqualified. Rather than the factually correct statement that I amended, i.e. that is no more than two and half thousand years old. We have no evidence that it is thousands of years old as claimed by some.. all we know is that it appears on the Osirion in Egypt and that the earliest possible date would be around 550 bc. Everything else is conjecture.

I would like to think that we can reach an agreement on the wording that allows for speculation but also is consistent with the facts that are known. Particularly when the footnote refers to speculative ideas that are unqualified.

If you look at my website, you will see that I am very open to "alternative" viewpoints. However I do have a problem with New Age concepts that fly in face of known facts, without any qualification or attempt to bridge with known scientific ideas.

Davidrf44

Da Vinci Flower of Life Reference

Hello Sloth Monkey,

The reasearch you did on the FOL is far superior than the old. I've enjoyed it!

The reason I'm leaving this message has to do specifically with Da Vinci and the FOL. I'm creating philosophy on evolution and was wondering if you knew of any websites/books/info on the two Da Vinci darwings posted on the FOL page. I'm trying to get at more information, and see more drawings of Da Vinci's flower stage. Do you know of any good books/articles/info that may dive deeper into Da vinci and the FOL? I was curious on where you found those two drawings and if there's anymore information on it that you may know about.

Thanks for your time! Let me know if you have any questions?

Ecb0038

Flower of Life

Sloth Monkey,

Thanks for the response. I appreciate it!!

I found your user name when I clicked into the two da vinci flower of life images. I realized it was you after I read over your user page...

I'm currently writing philosophy of science, and your flower of life section made me aware that there was sacred geometry w/in my philosophy...didn't even realize it until I made the comparisons between the flower of life and my own geometric proofs.

Again, thanks for your help!

--Ecb0038 23:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Geo Proofs

Hey Sloth Monkey,

Thanks for the metaphysics information! I appreciate it!

If you're still interested, I will send you a copy of the paper/book when it's complete. At this stage in the process it's so fragmented that I'm apprehensive to send anything out. The sacred geometry that I noticed when diagramming my philosophy was the seed of life, thy holy trinity, and the vesica piscis.

Thanks again for your help!

--Ecb0038 01:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Flower of Life: Thank You!

Sloth Monkey- I read the FOL article verycarefully and also read your debates with others in the Talk/Discuss section. I want you to know how grateful I am for your contributions to that article, your words and illustrations really gave me immense amounts of additional understanding about this symbol. I created a derivitive of it when I was a child and only recently with the internet have I been able to get the full possibilities of these geometries. Have you read Kieth Critchlow's "Order in Space"? It is awesome and though less mystical and more scientific, the forms are the same.

So, in long and short, I just wanted to thank you and say "keep up the good fight, sir!"

-Theory —Preceding unsigned comment added by Comixboy (talk • contribs) 08:06, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Check this out

I saw your tree of life image on wikipedia. They seem to like yours more than mine:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Kabbalistic_tree_of_life_plus_hemp.png

Let me know what you think. =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.103.48.8 (talk) 03:07, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

SpaceMonger

Hey sloth_monkey,

I see you have done a lot of work on the SpaceMonger article. Thanks! I hate to suggest this, since I appreciate your efforts, but I'm not sure the article belongs in Wikipedia. It reads mostly like an advertisement, even with the language cleaned up to NPOV. What do you think about deleting it? I have added some tags and a note on the discussion page... let me know what you think. --Culix (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

File:Tube-Torus Seed-of-Life Ratcheted.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tube-Torus Seed-of-Life Ratcheted.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Higher self, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Verbal chat 10:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bellatricians

The article Bellatricians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Prezbo (talk) 08:11, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Fruit-of-Life Platonic-Solids.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fruit-of-Life Platonic-Solids.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Maple Leaf 99999 Gold 2007 ObverseSide.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maple Leaf 99999 Gold 2007 ObverseSide.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 00:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Holy-Trinity-(Tripod-of-Life) Banner-w-3-Pennants.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Holy-Trinity-(Tripod-of-Life) Banner-w-3-Pennants.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:35, 27 December 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:35, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Blargocrappenstein!

Rawr!! --— sloth_monkey 11:34, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Psilocybin mushroom

Hi Sloth monkey,

I reverted your edits to Psilocybin mushroom because personal experience is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia. Secondly, when you edit article pages you should never sign your posts, as that is only for talk pages. Lastly, you should only mark your edits as "minor" when the edits don't change or add meaning to an article. Grammar changes, for instance, are minor edits, while your edit added content. Please feel free to stop by my talk page if you have any other questions. N^oformation ^Talk 04:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Ayahuasca are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. NOTE: I deleted your comments (twice!) from the Ayahuasca Talk page as they are not appropriate comments for that page space. Article talk pages are not discussion forums nor are they the appropriate places to leave advice, however well-intentioned. The purpose of article talk pages is to provide a place to discuss changes to the main article and to gain consensus for controversial edits. Please do not insert that text there again. Thank you, Dave (djkernen)|Talk to me|Please help! 16:33, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Sloth monkey/Food List

User:Sloth monkey/Food List, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sloth monkey/Food List and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Sloth monkey/Food List during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. N^oformation ^Talk 22:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

WP is WP:NOTAFORUM

Hi, I just reverted edits you made to Talk:Psilocybin mushroom/Archive 1. Firstly, please do not ever edit archives as they serve as a representation of past discussion. Secondly, Wikipedia is not a forum for discussion. Article talk pages are there to discuss improvements to articles and nothing else. Thanks. N^oformation ^Talk 22:56, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Ultimate secret

you can add relevant info to ultimate secret page and it won't be removed. just don't remove anything already there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.67.138.224 (talk) 09:39, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the invite. --— sloth_monkey 15:57, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

please could you comment

Please Sloth monkey could you have a look to the Introduction? – Imo it can help the average reader to understand the MHP-paradox. Nijdam opposes. Can you give your opinion on the talk page? Would be great. Thanks Gerhardvalentin (talk) 22:13, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Maple Leaf 99999 Gold 2007 ReverseSide.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:Maple Leaf 99999 Gold 2007 ReverseSide.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Love the sexy linda p pictures thanks very much :) :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.178.246.40 (talk) 20:48, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

March 2015

Hello, I'm Mufka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to March 19 because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 00:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

flower of life?

whats wrong with the formatting of the flower of life page?

I had the intention of recreating it on my page and then contend the deletion of it but I cant make it properly I dont know the formatting of wikipedia much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odarcan (talk • contribs) 19:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Flower of Life (geometry)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Flower of Life (geometry), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 21:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sloth monkey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sloth monkey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Fruit-of-Life.jpg

The file File:Fruit-of-Life.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused (see WP:NOTWEBHOST), unclear purpose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zinclithium (talk) 06:13, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sloth monkey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Финальная Фантазия: Легенда кристаллов listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Финальная Фантазия: Легенда кристаллов. Since you had some involvement with the Финальная Фантазия: Легенда кристаллов redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 20:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Seed-of-Life Stages.jpg

The file File:Seed-of-Life Stages.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Seed-of-Life.jpg

The file File:Seed-of-Life.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Seed-of-Life.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 13:05, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Tripod-of-Life Holy-Trinity.jpg

The file File:Tripod-of-Life Holy-Trinity.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Tripod-of-Life Holy-Trinity.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:37, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Egg-of-Life Stages.jpg

The file File:Egg-of-Life Stages.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused. Superseded by File:Egg-of-Life Stages.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 16:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)