User talk:Social Credit Generator

Disruptive editing[edit]

Hi, I see you have been making a lot of edits over the past day, and some of them are unconstructive editions. These include removing uncertainty ranges from time periods, vandalizing cladograms (like at Tethysuchia), and removing information supportive of mainstream phylogenetic interpretations (like at Eunotosaurus). We strongly recommend that you slow down and take care to explain or support your edits, or else you may be blocked. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 01:46, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

man ive been watching youtube for soooooo damn long ive worked so god damn hard on these edits.

also i didnt vandalise thethysuchia,it was an accident,could you possibly fix this

also i accidentally erased some stuff on dinosauromorpha it was an accident and not vandalism is swear brooooo this was when i didnt have this account

btw +infinite social credits for u fuck (talk) 02:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

oh btw the "fuck" thingy is my signature fuck (talk) 02:05, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i jsut did it for the memes fuck (talk) 02:06, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

also i swear,eunotosaurus is just a parareptile just being a turtle impostor, i cant edit taxonomy yet so... fuck (talk) 02:09, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sauropterygians are the actual ancestors of da turtles

long live plesiosaurs and placodonts yoooooooooo less go bois xd xd xd xd xd hahahah fuck (talk) 02:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't an issue with a clear consensus. Regardless of anything, you should write an edit summary every time you edit a page, precise your sources, and probably be a little more serious about editing in general. Larrayal (talk) 02:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

also i hate ankylopoda so muchhh, turtles should be part of archelosauria.im pretty sure that ankylopoda is already a rejected clade. fuck (talk) 02:19, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

oh hi larrayal,i used mindat.org or fossilworks to make my temporal ranges and stuff fuck (talk) 02:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mindat and Fossilworks are generally not really reliable sites. When there isn't any other alternative for a datation, they can be used with parsimony, but when an article already states dates that are different from what Mindat, Fossilworks, or PaleoBiologyDataBase says, there are probably a lot of good reasons for them to be the way they are Larrayal (talk) 02:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

mega bruh fuck (talk) 02:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

why would you want me to spend money just to find the temporal range of a godamn dinosaur fuck (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

am poor fuck (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are other ways of accessing scientific data. It's okay to use fossilworks for personal reasons, but we just want you to stop editing based off it. If you can't access papers with more precise stratigraphy then just don't edit any information about stratigraphy. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 12:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We should also note that we suspect you of using multiple accounts under these IPs: (70.35.208.194 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 45.73.93.182 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)). Please stop doing so. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 18:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i only have one account and its this one wdym fuck (talk) 23:25, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you are just lying. It's very easy to track the identical edit styles (and in some cases identical edits, like at Chalicothere) between you and the 45 IP at the very least. If you're still trying to convince us that you're not a vandal, you better own up to your mistakes. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 03:27, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i dont vandal,its just i dont know how to undo edits :( fuck (talk) 18:10, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Andethyst. I noticed that in this edit to Dinosaur, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Andethyst (talk) 01:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

cuz herrerasauria is definitly part of dinosauria fuck (talk) 01:28, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's uncertain. Patachonica (talk) 20:45, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 18:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58675[edit]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]