User talk:Soltan67

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Soltan67, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dai Pritchard (talk) 07:29, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

Your addition to Azadeh Tabazadeh has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 12:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:20, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soltan67 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a new user that contribute in three fields: 1.Iranian people who live abroad, 2. Iranian person who killed in Iran-Iraq war, 3. Iran cities. I am a researcher in Iranian history especially in modern Iranian history. Therefore, I prefer to work in the field. For this reason, I interest to write and edit modern Iranian history articles. My writing style in English is poor because I am Iranian and my native language is Persian. I think about Wikipedia that every one can contribute on the media and other users help each other. I think that I have wrong mind about Wikipedia!!!! After creation my username in Wikipedia, I studied about Wikipedia rules before any work in the media. I understand that Copy right is an important subject (1). For this reason, search about the subject especially about copy right investigation tools. Therefore, I found Copyvio detector. After I work with this tool and used Hasan Bagheri article for my practice. I found that this article nominated in this page for copy right investigation. Therefore, I studied the page and understand that All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. I think my work is correct. I don't know Charm4Fasl and Srahmadi. I am not a sockpuppet of them and I think they work in Iran-Iraq war fields. Your reason (Soltan67 and Charm4Fasl have three user boxes is common.) about user box is wrong because I used some user boxes that many users use of them. Your reason (common user boxes and similar comments in Talk:Ahmad Motevaselian and edited Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Srahmadi) is not strong reason for express that I have a relation with Charm4Fasl and Srahmadi. Srahmadi and Charm4Fasl were users that work in Iranian fields and there are many users that work in the field. Unfortunately, I went to pages that these users left a comment. I have several questions about Wikipedia policy and rules? I think Wikipedia is a good media for publishing information about Iran and Iranian person?I think that Wikipedia is a media that all users help each other but now I have negative idea about Wikipedia. I am a young Iranian researcher and you have worst behavior with me as a new user. I want to ask my questions from Wikipedia chief.Soltan67 (talk) 11:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 12:51, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Question[edit]

@DoRD: Can you explain for me about your reason about confirmed block?Soltan67 (talk) 13:11, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I used the CheckUser tool to verify that you are abusing multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 13:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DoRD:I have one account and don't know about abusing multiple accounts. Who is my suckpupets?Soltan67 (talk) 13:31, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DoRD:Can you show me CheckUser tool output?Soltan67 (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the socks, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srahmadi. For the CU data, no, that's not possible. —DoRD (talk) 13:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DoRD:I don't know Srahmadi. I work individual in Wikipedia and don't know srahmadi.Please help me. Now, what should I do?Soltan67 (talk) 13:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]