User talk:Somonlast

Your racism charges

Please do not add things like this with unreliable sources. That is only one minority's opinion. If you do so you may have your account blocked from editing. Thank you.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:59, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Also, are you in any way related to UniversityLeaks? If so, you appear to have a conflict of interest.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:28, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011

Your recent editing history at Desi Boyz shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Swarm ^X 04:51, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for spamming or advertising. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Swarm ^X 05:03, 18 December 2011 (UTC)