User talk:Sonicsorus

Welcome!

Hello, Sonicsorus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Bachrach44 13:24, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Factory Of Angst. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 猛禽22 ^•• 01:04, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proper Citation[edit]

I suggest you read through this. Thank You.--猛禽22 ^•• 01:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Anal Kitties (band), you will be blocked from editing. 猛禽22 ^•• 01:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what I'm looking at in your reflist, and I'm not sure if they're even reliable, but I'm going to give you some time to adjust these sources to the proper dates, genres, and sentences to something like this: [1]. In the meantime, I'm going to check these sources for reliability since sources cannot be user contributed.--猛禽22 ^•• 02:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please take the above statement into consideration, these sources do not look very reliable, and since they're not pointing to anything in specific, there is no full understanding of these sources. I'm trying to help you, and if the sources aren't proper enough, your articles can be in danger of getting deleted.--猛禽22 ^•• 03:53, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Anal Kitties (band). Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 02:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Anal Kitties (band). Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. 猛禽22 ^•• 05:23, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anal Kitties (band)[edit]

The article Anal Kitties (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability, sources do not appear reliable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 猛禽22 ^•• 05:33, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Clean up the page, find good and reliable sources, and although there is no promises, I'll try to get the deletion tag removed. 猛禽22 ^•• 05:40, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits[edit]

You have a lot to learn about Wikipedia, you can't just jump in there, create an article, and expect it to run it your way. Wikipedia is where everyone contributes, not just you. I suggest you read all of the welcome links and citing source manuals that are currently on your page if you plan on editing further. I am sorry if I am being harsh and hostile towards you, but this is for the sake of Wikipedia. I see you're probably in good faith, and that's why I hesitate to report you for disruptive edits probably. Please, just try to look through some Wikipedia instructions on how to create a good article.--猛禽22 ^•• 05:42, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Anal Kitties (band), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 猛禽22 ^•• 05:45, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Anal Kitties (band). Saebjorn! 05:48, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anal Kitties (band). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Momo san ^Gespräch 05:53, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just wait a little...[edit]

Please just try fixing the article first, and use the talk page for some discussion of the article. It won't be deleted for seven days, you've got some time. Good luck! I can even help if you want. But leave the tags on and get some sources. We're all only here to make the encyclopedia. Saebjorn! 05:55, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Block rescinded. Pretty much, if you are having a problem with a user, you need to talk it out with him first instead of just reverting. I would like to note that the people who reverted you were not following the rules; if an article has been suggested for deletion (a PROD, which is noted with a template) and the template was removed, a Deletion discussion must take place where the community is involved. If you have any questions, come to my talk page and I will help you. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:49, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh.[edit]

I should have read about PROD. I'm very sorry about replacing the tags on that article. I didn't read about the guidelines. I'm very sorry. I'm glad your block was rescinded, though! Good luck on that article. Saebjorn! 16:46, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anal Kitties (band)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Anal Kitties (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Sonicsorus. You have new messages at Seraphimblade's talk page.
Message added 07:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:26, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]