User talk:SpaceOfficial

Welcome!

Hello, SpaceOfficial, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Apollo 4, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia

• Contributing to Wikipedia

• How to edit a page and how to develop articles

• Help pages

• Tutorial

• Article wizard for creating new articles

• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Drm310 (talk) 20:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Your username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "SpaceOfficial", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because user of the word "official" implies that you are here in an official capacity. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. -- Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 02:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 20:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Response from SpaceOfficial to VQuakr:

Legal request and legal and official copies sent to a public institution are not considered like threats. Interpretating by law, like a threat, an official message to inform that a legal and official request has been sent to a public institution in order to request an official and legitimate response constitutes an incorrect assessment and allegation. Our message is not a threat and any interpretation on this sens can constitute an offense.

A couple more requests

Please stop communicating in all caps per WP:SHOUT; probably not your intention but it comes across as disruptive. Also please ensure that this account represents a single person; as discussed at WP:NOSHARE accounts must not be shared (you have referred to yourself as "we" a few times). VQuakr (talk) 22:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

RESPONSE from SpaceOfficial to VQuakf

Sorry for the upper case. I said "we" because we are several users to have signed and sent an official request to NASA Headquarters' Media Department and to the Federal Bureau for Copyrights in order to stop the illegal activity of a Youtube account "wdtvlive42 - Archive Footage" which pretends to be an official archive concerning the NASA documentaries. This is a serious legal matter: NASA is an official Government Agency and like any Government Agency the use of any official document, photos, or movies must be respected concerning the original logo, sources and archives of the Government. They are public domain. However "wdtvlive42 - Archive Footage" is absolutely not an official archive institution and play on the confusion of the name given to his or her Youtube channel. This can represent a fraud or usurpation. The real archives, in the public domain indeed, are the National Archives of the United States of America with the correct link that I (we) have mentioned.

The real trouble on wikipedia is that some admins (!!!) have rejected blindly my (our) request without noticing this!! I have even removed two dead links on the page of Wikipedia "Apollo 13" (multimedia post conference part 1 and part 2) because the videos on Youtube have been obviously removed (account deleted because of copyrights issus): the admin "Canterbury Tail" has put them back saying the videos on Youtube are still present!!! This is really worrying for a wikipedia admin... No check up and reinstoring links which dont exist anymore. We strongly suspect the owner of the Youtube account "wdtvlive42 - Archive Footage" to be also present among the users on Wikipedia. This is why, without being a threat but a request, I (we) would like to bring the attention of the public and request an investigation if this activity continues on Wikipedia. In a word, this is a simple legal and official request to a public investigation.

Message REF/542619W112015 legal Copy.

November 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 22:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

RESPONSE from SpaceOfficial to VQuakr

Nobody is "in war" against someone else. However, Usurpation of a public institution is a public, serious, legal and official matter.

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because the chosen username is a violation of our username policy as it implies shared use. You have also been issuing legal threats, and edit warring. See our blocking, edit warring, and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)