User talk:Sub3639
Sub3639, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure![edit]
The
Adventure
|
Reg... Undoing edit is against the open source like wikipedia[edit]
Undoing edit is against the open source like wikipedia[edit]
only big contribution can't be consider.small small contribution can make a big change.only big name will be known to everybody and others will be kept in shadow.I will never tolerate such immaturity. Also i demand wiki is an open source information system.I am doing such things because i hav a noble cause to promote those who are not finding any platform to promote themself.And as a authorized member of wiki,i hav that right to take evolutionry step to promote those thing which are not coming in front of man's eye.
Subhankar Satapathy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sub3639 (talk • contribs) 15:00, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi Subhankar Satapathy(user: Sub3639), certainly appreciate the noble cause. There is nothing called "demand" here based on the argument of open-source, when only the factual information should be represented here. However, you are mistaken on two aspects. First, undoing changes as long as they are not verifiable is perfectly valid and I can counteract your point on this. Second, this is a not a promotional platform. Just because of the to and fro communications, you just increased the scope of the work needed to list the people who are already established, behind your zeal of promoting an artist. Thanks, --Karan1974 (talk) 19:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)