User talk:Svideo

Speedy deletion of SVideo[edit]

A tag has been placed on SVideo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kesac (talk) 23:21, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article was purged and re-directed. Please do not recreate it. Michaelbusch (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Please do not use Wikipedia to promote businesses, such as you did in the article S-Video. Wikipedia is not the "Yellow Pages". If you want to list a company for potential customers to find, please consider alternative outlets, such as Wikia's Yellowikis. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 18:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a g"roup, organization or website, I have blocked this account; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:47, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Svideo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unblock we are s-video.org and a lot of the information appearing on wikipedia was taken from our webpages. we promote s-video products, of course, but do not like the fact that other websites are referenced as source for the definition of s-video, such as about.com---

Decline reason:

As it says in the block notice, we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:47, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

please unblock