User talk:Swankytank

Report/Ban[edit]

I'm filing a complaint to have your account locked up. What sick twisted man like yourself said deserves to be sued for, failing to comply will involve this action being taken further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronnie42 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 24 January 2013 (UTC) I restored the original post that was falsified by Swankytank before they replied. --217/83 01:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Ronnie, that sounds like a delight. What time shall I be there?--Swankytank (talk) 15:27, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on Ronnie42's talk page[edit]

Hi there - I noticed the dispute between yourself and Ronnie42. I've initiated a new and civil discussion on his talk page, so please join so we can all put this unfortunate situation behind us.

Oh, and thank you for apologizing. That's a great start! --Stronger Than Paul (talk) 02:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think I may understand what's going on here. I'all respond on his page soon.--Swankytank (talk) 11:32, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Swankytank. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]