User talk:Swineposit

This page was nominated for deletion on 23 February 2017. The result of the discussion was Speedy Keep.

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charlotte Rampling filmography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sturmer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of awards and nominations received by Charlotte Rampling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Restless. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Death to All But Metal[edit]

The article Death to All But Metal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 12:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Graham Gardner. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 02:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Birth date of Sirkka-Liisa Konttinen[edit]

Please answer (or otherwise respond to) the question I asked you two days ago within Talk:Sirkka-Liisa Konttinen. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 23:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? -- Hoary (talk) 09:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss for a period of 24 hours. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced edits[edit]

I've mass-rollbacked your edits due to most if not all of them being unsourced (and alot of your edits needed consensus), I would strongly advise if you ever come back that you stop adding unsourced content and infuture discuss first, Thank you. –Davey2010^Talk 23:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unblock|reason= your reason here [[User:Swineposit|Swineposit]] ([[User talk:Swineposit#top|talk]]) 11:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)}} {{unblock-auto|2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Swineposit". The reason given for Swineposit's block is: "Persistent addition of unsourced content".|3=Yamaguchi先生|4=6993173|reason= your reason here}}</nowiki>

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swineposit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, Yamaguchi please unblock me, I will never ever add the unsourced articles again to their births, it was a serious accident for what i've done i'm sorry

Decline reason:

For a significant percentage of these additions of claimed dates of birth, it is becoming harder to believe that mere incompetence or a comparable "accident" was to blame. Instead, it looks like the insertion of mere fiction, freshly concocted for the purpose. (And not only here, but also in Portuguese-language Wikipedia.) One necessary condition for unblocking is complete candor about the behavior that led to the block. Hoary (talk) 23:51, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Swineposit. If I may ask, why did you ignore prior attempts to engage in discussion regarding your unsourced edits? Specifically, what changes do you intend to make to articles if unblocked, and what sources would you be incorporating? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another question for you: the one above about Sirkka-Liisa Konttinen. Where did the information come from?

. Yes, that's correct Sirkka-Liisa Konttinen was born in 1948. Not March 27 i was completely wrong. Because her birth date is unknown. She was not born on January 1 either.

Comment interpolated by User:Swineposit within this series of edits (18 November 2016).

And more. Here's a recent bunch:

Where did you find the birth date for each of these? -- Hoary (talk) 10:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because of put it on other foreign wikipedia, i promise you will never block me from editing, thanks, Swineposit, i want to be expired next week. According to other Wikipedia, Peter Terrin was born in 1968 in English Wikipedia, but other languages he was born on 3 October. Riku Korhonen was born in 1973 with unsourced, but he was born 3 February on other foreign ones. Iris Hanika was born on 18 October in German and Italian. Her birth date is 1962 on English. Jean Back, other one. He was born in 1953 in English one. His birth date was given as December 5 on Italian and Luxembourgian Wikipedia. Razvan Radulescu, well he was born in 1969 in english. His birth date was given October 23 in French, Romanian and Italian Wikipedia, not English one. I'm afraid. .... added by Swineposit within this series of edits (18 November 2016)

The first one I asked about was Sirkka-Liisa Konttinen. So, her birth date was "because of put it on other foreign wikipedia". That's quite a surprise, Swineposit, given that the only other Wikipedia that has an article on her is the fi:WP, and the Finnish article about her gives no birthdate. What is it that I fail to understand?

. I understand she was born just 1948. I'm not lying to you. Her birth date was unknown, because it was correct. Keep her article on birth date unsourced.

Comment interpolated by User:Swineposit within this series of edits (18 November 2016).

Here's another one. En:WP tells us that Sebastian Gryphius was born circa 1492. Until 19 October, Sebastião Grifo agreed. But on that day, a pt:WP user named Swineposit made a surprising addition to it:

'''Sebastião Grifo''' (em [[língua francesa|francês]]: '''Sébastien Gryphe'''; em [[latim]]: '''Sebastianus Gryphius''' ou '''Gryphium''') ([[29 de março]] cerca [[1492]] em [[Reutlingen]], [[Alemanha]] - [[1556]] em [[Lyon]], [[França]]) foi um impressor e editor [[franceses|francês]] do [[século XVI]].

Any comment on this one? -- Hoary (talk) 14:09, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I already removed that birth date of Sebastian Gryphius article days ago. I was clearly wrong. he was born in circa 1492. He does not have the birth date which is unsourced. If I stop adding that births which they are unsourced. So you won't have to block me then. That's correct, he was not born on January, 26 March, 27 March. Because his birth date is unknown. I will remove the March 29 on Portuguese and Macedonian Wikipedia. See happy now, Hoary, i'd removed the date of birth with 28 March on French Wikipedia. I deeply regret it. If you let me free from block.

About a few days ago, Davey2010, you'd removed the births of Dimitrios Maximos, because of his birth date was unsourced, but he was not born on March 27 either. Also removed, birth date of Panagis Tsaldaris, too his birth is not the 17 May because also its unsourced as well. Themistoklis Sofoulis was not born on June 24, but died on that date, his birth date was unsourced too. Do you understand now, Davey2010. All of their birth dates are now unsourced. Swineposit (talk), 18 November 2016, 16:13 (UTC).

Davey 2010, you removed the death year of Greek tennis player Evangelos Rallis, because it was unknown. He does not have a death date and year for it. That's correct, his year of death was unknown. I'm very deeply sorry about that. He died unknown, is it right, hey Hoary. I'm not put his death year back again on the article. Swineposit (talk), 18 November 2016. 16:22 (UTC).

What about Georges Eekhoud? hey. Well then, his birth date was given on May 27, but not March. Eekhoud would have been born two months prior, then. It's correct his birth date was given on May 27, 1854. It that correct, yes it is. Swineposit.

Well about Jean Cau (rower) then. He was born on March 27, 1875. He did not died in 1921. Because his date of death was unknown. I understand now. Swineposit.

Dionysios Kokkinos was not born on March 27, 1884. Because his birth date was unknown too. According to Greek Wikipedia, he died on 10 February 1967. I was a complete muddler. Wasn't I. I'd also removed it days ago, too.

Stelios Kouloglou. His birth date was born on 27 February in Italian one. But not on French and English one two. His birth was born in 1953. Swineposit.

Japanese violinist Daishin Kashimoto, has a birth date on 27 March in only French, Russian and Japanese wikipedia. But not in English. Last time, as IP when i was blocked in March 2014, because i'd made disruptive editing. This won't happen again anymore.

In February 2014, i've added the birth date for Sebastião Rodrigues Soromenho. I was later blocked by Smalljim when i use the old IP. Correct, his birth date was not born on March 27 or neither 6 April. His birth date is unknown. His birth year was only 1560. I will not re-add his birth date again.

What about the Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Doroshenko. Well his birth date was 8 April, not 27 February. His old style birth date was March 27. Later it was removed because of my old IP made disruptive editing on it. Yes that's correct, he was born 8 April. .... added by Swineposit within this series of edits (18 November 2016)

You're addressing "Davey 2010" or "Davey2010". @Davey2010: I've just pinged the latter for you. -- Hoary (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not interpolate your own response within a signed question or other comment. Instead, write it below the comment to which it's a response. And at the end of your response or other comment, sign it, by adding ~~~~. Thank you. -- Hoary (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Swineposit, you admit to making "unsourced" additions. But within Wikipedia, "unsourced" has a variety of meanings. Often it means that no source is provided. But when for example you write above: Also removed, birth date of Panagis Tsaldaris, too his birth is not the 17 May because also its unsourced as well, do you instead mean that no source is known to exist? If (or where) you do indeed mean the latter, then have you simply been getting these factoids from your imagination?

Also, be sure to answer Yamaguchi先生's earlier question. (You'd better answer it above, immediately below the place where Yamaguchi先生 asked it.) -- Hoary (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

See I'd removed the date of birth of Dimitrios Maximos in with five different birth dates on French, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, and Russian Wikipedia. Please don't give a global block, thank you. Swineposit. I will not add his birth date to 27 March, 27 February, 3 March 21 March and 17 March. Because of prime minister's birth date is unknown. I'm very sorry for multilingual childishness behaviour and I clearly denied it. Swineposit (talk) 12:57, 19 November 2016 (UTC). This won't happen again. Swineposit (talk) 13:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, my users, Panagis Tsaldaris died on 17 May, not born on that date. I've added it on 12 May, later it was removed. Because it does not say on English Wikipedia and unsourced. Swineposit (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard[edit]

I've brought up issues related to you within the administrators' noticeboard. You can't respond there directly as long as you are blocked. However, if you would like to respond there, please post your message below, and I or somebody else will copy it to that noticeboard. Please be as clear and concise as possible. -- Hoary (talk) 02:10, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The administrators' noticeboard provides evidence of your insertion of contradictory fictions. On a single day (11 November 2016), across Wikipedias of seven languages, you gave five different dates of birth for a single person. At least four of the five have to be fictional. -- Hoary (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The WP:AN discussion is now archived here. I retract my offer to post your reaction there or anywhere else. -- Hoary (talk) 08:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata[edit]

I have asked here that you be blocked from editing Wikidata. You may wish to respond there. -- Hoary (talk) 05:10, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That discussion (in which Swineposit did not participate) was later moved here. -- Hoary (talk) 09:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

it.wikipedia[edit]

And need also an answer in you discussion page on it.wikipeida. --ValterVB (talk) 10:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Swineposit. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gundars Mauševics[edit]

The article Gundars Mauševics has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable musician that fails WP:NMUSIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:37, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This will be deleted --Shiesmine (talk) 14:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

Please, delete the blocked user --Shiesmine (talk) 14:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Swineposit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Swineposit". The reason given for Swineposit's block is: "Persistent addition of unsourced content". I'm now on my good behaviour since banned indefinitely in November 2016

Blocking administrator: Yamaguchi先生 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Procedural decline - you need to use {{unblock|your reason here}} instead. —DoRD (talk) 16:25, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Charlotte Rampling has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Charlotte Rampling, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --wooden superman 14:32, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Associates Party Fears Two cover.jpeg[edit]

The file File:Associates Party Fears Two cover.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This image was created by now-indefinite blocked user Swineposit. I want it deleted, please.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Hurry Up Harry (Sham 69).jpg[edit]

The file File:Hurry Up Harry (Sham 69).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Delete the file within 7 days time

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stefanos Chandakas[edit]

The article Stefanos Chandakas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 17:35, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]