User talk:T3g5JZ50GLq

Welcome![edit]

Hello, T3g5JZ50GLq, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you may find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or post a question on your own talk page. Again, welcome! AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

T3g5JZ50GLq, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi T3g5JZ50GLq! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Hi. In User:T3g5JZ50GLq/New British & Race-built galleon you include several other pages, notably {{:Race-built galleon}}. By doing so you add your page into the category list which is probably unintended and certainly incorrect. See Category:Nautical_terminology for example. If you are working on text then cut-and-paste is more appropriate, there's rarely a good reason to actually transclude a main-space article into a draft page. If the page you are working is not a draft but some private research then WP is not really the place to store it – try something like zotero for example. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 10:09, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin of Sheffield: I thought userpages were ignored. This was a test of mediawiki templates. T3g5JZ50GLq (talk) 17:11, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately not. When developing a page it is common to comment out the categories: . When main space pages are transcluded this is not possible. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 17:27, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin of Sheffield: I see you are [[Category:Wikipedians who use Zotero]]. Is zotero more useful than just using the wikicode toolbar? Does it output {{Cite web}} ? ←→ T3g5JZ50GLq (talk) 00:02, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I use Zotero for private research, gathering information and references. It's a handy way of storing web images, synopses and bibliographic data. When transferring to WP I write clean text (ie not copied or edited) and use Z to fill in the citations, which it does make a fair job of. Z means that I can keep copies of data "for research of private study" in compliance with the Copyright Act whilst not infringing WP:COPYVIO. It's also useful for non-WP research. One neat thing it does is from an ISBN it will automatically look up the full details. HTH, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 09:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

I went to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MergeAccount

fr.wikipedia.org & es.wikipedia.org logins ok

however,

https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin

Login attempt results in:

"There seems to be a problem with your login session; this action has been canceled as a precaution against session hijacking. Please resubmit the form."

removing cookies does not help

T3g5JZ50GLq (talk) 10:13, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Try https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralLogin - that should reset your login status for all wikis. Huon (talk) 20:57, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me! 2[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

   I went to:
   https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralLogin
   then
   https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
   T3g5JZ50GLq
   Alerts (0)
   Notices (0)
   Talk
   Preferences
   Contributions
   Log out

however,

https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin

Login attempt results in:

"There seems to be a problem with your login session; this action has been canceled as a precaution against session hijacking. Please resubmit the form."

removing cookies does not help

turning off adblocking does not help — Preceding unsigned comment added by T3g5JZ50GLq (talk • contribs)

Does it work in New Private Window? Log in to wikimedia, then at meta, in the same tab. --Gryllida (talk) 04:50, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

first @Gryllida: I deleted mediawiki wikimedia wikipedia cookies

https://login.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin&returnto=Main+Page
 then in same tab 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
says "login"
hit refresh a couple of times, then "
says "logout"

—§—T3g5JZ50GLq (talk) 05:01, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Gryllida:

in New Private Window? Log in to wikimedia, then at meta, in the same tab
works
https://en.wikipedia.org/
says:
login
(and not T3g5JZ50GLq)
https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/partners/26/
says:
login
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:OAuth/authenticate
says:
No session token.

..?..?...←§→T3g5JZ50GLq (talk) 05:48, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am asking for more information.

Please try these steps:

1. Open a new private window.

2. Visit en.wikipedia.org. Log in.

3. Visit http://meta.wikimedia.org . Check that it is logged in.

4. Visit https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/partners/26/ , authenticate, check that OAuth works.

Thank you! Gryllida (talk) 09:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As an additional note, there were some issues with the central login yesterday. Note that you do not need to merge your accounts more than once. Please try again and re-open the {{help me}} request if there are still issues. Primefac (talk) 13:38, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:T3g5JZ50GLq/List of positive tests of infection from the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:T3g5JZ50GLq/List of positive tests of infection from the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people with coronavirus disease 2019. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Toddst1 (talk) 01:58, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

A page you created has been nominated for deletion because it is a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and has unsourced content, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create articles about living people that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative, unreferenced biographies of living people, along with attack pages, are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy may be blocked from editing. Toddst1 (talk) 01:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, La Poupée qui fait non, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See WP:ISAWIT Toddst1 (talk) 02:02, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Toddst1 is upset about List of notable people who have tested positive for COVID-19. Toddst1 uses templates to mislead, I did not create the page, La Poupée qui fait non, I did not change the content of the page, I restructured it to remove someone else's attempt at misdirection. —§—T3g5JZ50GLq (talk) 04:16, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

T3g5JZ50GLq, Please understand that Toddst1's reversion of your edit has nothing to do with your draft page. As an aside, you challenged the deletion of your draft using the rationale that "Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 March 19 contradicts this assertion". I think it just the opposite...the DRV clearly established that the community didn't want to have a big list article about people who had coronavirus. Perhaps I've missed something? CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 07:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at La Poupée qui fait non. Toddst1 (talk) 14:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of positive tests of infection from the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of positive tests of infection from the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[{{{value1}}}]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Natureium (talk) 15:20, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:T3g5JZ50GLq/List of positive tests of infection from the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:T3g5JZ50GLq/List of positive tests of infection from the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people with coronavirus disease 2019. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 21:16, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lucullan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucius Licinius Lucullus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lucullan[edit]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Lucullan are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

If you would like to write an article (or add to an existing article) on Lucullan marble, you can retrieve your source material from the Lucullan page history.

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 12:10, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armonite[edit]

Hi T3g5JZ50GLq, I want to fix Armonite's article with the addition of more references. I'm a newbie though, would you please give me a few suggestions? If you let me know where you feel the article is unreferenced, I'll be glad to work on it. Thank you! Kr1shnamur (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi T3g5JZ50GLq! You created a thread called Is Arcadia Publishing considered a reliable source? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Men whistleblowers has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Men whistleblowers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Natureium (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 21[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The History of White People in America, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Riley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dipsea Race, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandspit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 5[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Goldie Hawn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pal Joey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Christine Sterling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rix (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello T3g5JZ50GLq, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to KTNQ have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Secretarial school"[edit]

Hey, just letting you know that I've deleted the above redirect you created as it falls under the R3 speedy-deletion criterion. Search terms wrapped with quotation marks are not necessary because Wikipedia's search bar automatically interprets "Foo" as Foo. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 24[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Fay (American actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Franco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]