User talk:TL001

I'd like someone to review this article.

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

This is my first contribution for Wiki, and I'd appreciate your help to get it moved to be a formal page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TL001/sandbox I have read this article, but feel I need to work with an editor who can review and help. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:PRIMER#From_sandbox_to_mainspace

TL001 (talk) 16:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be very happy to help you. I will get a chance to look at it in detail late tonite, but from a first quick glance, there is one glaring problem. It wouldn't prevent it from going into the encyclopedia, but it will have to be cleared up. We never type anything in all caps on Wikipedia, so if you would take the time to fix the section headers, capitalizing only the first word and proper nouns, that would be a good place to start. It also seems quite long for an article an a "lesser known" band, so you might want to look at what you may want to take out. Not trying to disparage the band, but they were never the success The Beach Boys were, and the article you have written is nearly as long. TTYL...off to farm now! Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just an observation: you should remove the ALL CAPS HEADINGS. Kevin 12xd (contribs) 18:53, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AFC is the correct method of submitting things for review. I have placed it as pending for review. Mkdw ^talk 22:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks all. I just changed the capitalization problem, and I appreciate your guidance. One other question. Currently there is not a page for the Rip Chords in wikipedia, but that name forwards to Bruce and Terry. As this article clarifies, they were part of the history but certainly not all of it. Can this page be titled The Rip Chords so that the old forward goes away? TL001 (talk) 05:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend you create all subsequent articles at WP:WIZ. Someone will give you feedback and help you with the technical aspects if it meets the notability requirements and gets approved. Mkdw ^talk 08:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Rip Chords.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson241 (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

The Rip Chords (band), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

APerson241 (talk) 23:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Rip Chords (band) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

He and Bruce did the background vocals. <ref>Jason Ankeny, Bruce and Terry Biography, Allmusic)</ref> The song peaked at #4 on Billboard’s Hot 100 in February1964.<ref>Billboard, February 8,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:56, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 19 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the The Rip Chords (band) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, TL001. You have new messages at John from Idegon's talk page.
Message added 18:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

John from Idegon (talk) 18:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Homestead and Wolfe (March 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. The band's record label is a primary source and not independent reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Homestead and Wolfe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Homestead and Wolfe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TL001! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:46, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Homestead and Wolfe[edit]

Hello, TL001. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Homestead and Wolfe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Homestead and Wolfe[edit]

Hello, TL001. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Homestead and Wolfe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]