User talk:Taavi/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Trying to correct an article

I got this message:

“Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did at United States Army uniforms in World War II, you may be blocked from editing.” Thank you. User:122.108.183.105 19:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

The errors on the article are extensive. I have sources and the article does not of course because it is wrong.

Can I get permission to fix it? Wolfhound63 (talk) 16:34, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Responded at your talk page. Majavah (talk) 17:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Editing TheDailyWTF

I attempted to add a line about a running gag in the TDWTF forums, which you removed due to lack of citation. However, there is no meaningful way to provide a reference to what is, simply, a running joke. It consists of a series of one-sentence comments mixed in with the rest of the comments (sometimes even contained within a longer comment), and providing a reference to a single comment will be even more useless and confusing than providing no reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.32.250.242 (talk) 13:12, 6 June 2019 (UTC) 207.32.250.242 (talk) 13:14, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey! Sorry for that, I was definitely too fast reverting that change. I've un-reverted that change with {{citation needed}}. --Majavah (talk) 13:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Majavah, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 00:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

17:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: HKL Class M100 has been accepted

HKL Class M100, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Redalert2fan (talk) 16:15, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

20:37, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Links to disambiguation pages

Hi Majavoh, I have reverted your edit to Paris Peace Conference and here is why: most links to disambiguation pages are accidental and need to be fixed. If the link is intentional, it needs to have the '(disambiguation)' attached; this tells readers that they are going to a disambiguation page and tell editors that the link is intentional. If you are interested, you can read more about this at WP:INTDABLINK. Leschnei (talk) 13:02, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

17:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 7

21:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

20:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 8

13:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Bots Newsletter, August 2019

Greetings!

Here is the 7th issue of the Bots Newsletter, a lot happened since last year's newsletter! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list.

Highlights for this newsletter include:

ARBCOM
  • Nothing of note happened. Just like we like it.
BAG

BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG.

We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary.

BOTDICT

Two new entries feature in the bots dictionary

BOTPOL
  • Activity requirements: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC).
  • Copyvio flag: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion). There is currently 1 bot using this functionality.
  • Mass creation: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from articles, to all content-pages. There are subtleties, but content here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION.
BOTREQs and BRFAs

As of writing, we have...

  • 20 active BOTREQs, please help if you can!
  • 14 open BRFAs and 1 BRFA in need of BAG attention (see live status).
  • In 2018, 96 bot task were approved. An AWB search shows approximately 29 were withdrawn/expired, and 6 were denied.
  • Since the start of 2019, 97 bot task were approved. Logs show 15 were withdrawn/expired, and 15 were denied.
  • 10 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion). 5 other bots have been deflagged per operator requests or similar (see discussion).
New things
Other discussions

These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last Bots Newsletter. Many are stale, but some are still active.

See also the latest discussions at the bot noticeboard.

Thank you! edited by: Headbomb 17:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)


(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list.)

18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

15:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

09:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

16:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Please, be careful in using stub templates. I've noticed that you used INC stub on a BJP politician and on a Independent politicians. Thanks.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 15:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

I must've overlooked those in a hurry. Sorry and thanks for the heads-up, I'll be more careful in the future. Majavah (t/c) 15:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to User talk:Serols— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:50, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 9

15:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Majavah. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 13:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! --Majavah (t/c) 14:09, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

23:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

14:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

16:16, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

16:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

EF/FP/R

Thanks for all your help at WP:EF/FP/R! Re your revert of LynxTufts, it's been a long-standing tradition to remove reports where the user was clearly vandalizing or trolling, per WP:DENY. It's not necessary, and if there's any possibility that the edits were in good faith, it's best to leave the report. (For example, we once got a flood of reports from users tripping one of the blanking filters, which eventually led to the discovery a MediaWiki bug that was mangling about 40 edits/day) For a long time we had a nasty warning in the header, but I removed it out of concern it was scaring away good faith editors as well. See WT:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 3#Warning header for the details.

I suppose we could have a policy about this, but I'd rather not. If make "all reports must stay" the policy, then we give a sure way for trolls to memorialize their crap. If we make it "all bad reports must go" then some over-eager people will probably start remove good faith reports as well, out of some perceived obligation. So, I'd rather just let people stick with their preference of "reply to everything" vs WP:RBI for now. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 10

22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

20:17, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 Requesting immediate archiving... Majavah (t/c) 08:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Message from 212.170.228.178

Hello Majavah,

I was still editing the document. Most of the sources are in the Spanish version of the same topic. I would like to add that information to the page. If you could kindly restore may editing, I would like to finish it.

Kind regards,

P. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.170.228.178 (talk) 15:18, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi there! Your edits are still available in the page history (Special:Diff/927131965) and may be used to continue editing. Current policy states that Wikipedia articles can't be used as instead of reliable sources. See WP:CITE on instructions on how to properly cite sources. Thanks! --Majavah (t/c) 15:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Widr (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

@Widr: That was fast. Thank you! --Majavah (t/c) 20:20, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

16:52, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 11

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

I see you recently accepted a pending change to November 30 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 18:22, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

@Toddst1: Hi. The edit I accepted (Special:Diff/928351209) only fixed capitalization in "Broadcaster". Did you mean to send this message to User:Lectonar who accepted the original addition? Best regards, Majavah (t/c) 18:28, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Facepalm Facepalm More coffee. Cheers. Toddst1 (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

16:58, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

BRFA for MajavahBot

Your recent bot approvals request has been approved for trial. Please see the request page for details. Enterprisey (talk!) 18:18, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Jimmy Tobin

The article for https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Tobin states that he had two children, though he actually had nine. I know this because he is my grandfather, and those nine children are my mother and my uncles and aunts. I’m not sure what constitutes a reliable source fir this information - any guidance would be appreciated. Canicopolis (talk) 13:03, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Canicopolis, unfortunately "he was my grandfather" does not satisfy the Wikipedia:No original research guideline (also see Wikipedia:Verifiability). As for finding a source, the folks at the teahouse can give better advice than I can, but any newspaper article or something similar should do it (see the instructions at Help:Referencing for beginners). Regards, Majavah (t/c) 14:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Majavah, Thanks for your suggestion. I have subscribed to a newspaper archive and found this article, which lists his sons and daughters. Would this do as a source?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E1HIl2wgvexBKzd7eZo323wWSYhspzjy/view?usp=drivesdk
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g23f5bYEJDwUEC2os-Jf9D3Kc9X9P1ad/view?usp=drivesdk
Regards, Canicopolis
Canicopolis, that should do it. See the instructions at Help:Referencing for beginners for how to properly format the references. Thank you for your contribution, and welcome to Wikipedia! Regards, Majavah (t/c) 16:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

16:38, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

00:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

20:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

BRFA for MajavahBot: extended trial

Hi, and happy new year! I've approved MajavahBot for an extended trial just so we can make sure there aren't any bugs; I figured only five edits wouldn't really be enough. I will definitely approve if that trial looks good. I've also left more notes on the BRFA page. Thanks for your work on the bot! Enterprisey (talk!) 07:03, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Human trafficking in Finland

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Human trafficking in Finland you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Minecrafter0271 -- Minecrafter0271 (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello! I am sorry, but for personal reasons, I will not be able to complete the review in a timely manner. I am sorry. Minecrafter0271 (talk) 20:16, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Help!!

Please guide me in creating my article. I'm not doing somebody's promotion on Wikipedia. He is Arthur Choo, he deserve to be on Wikipedia. Please tell me the removable points in my article. It is urgent to be live on Wikipedia. If you could contact me on any another website like Facebook l, insta or WhatsApp, then it will be a salute to you. I can pay you if you contact me and help me. (removed Majavah (t/c) 08:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)) Artdotc 01:35, 6 January 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artdotc (talkcontribs)

You've been told multiple times what's wrong with the article. I am not willing to accept pay for editing. Majavah (t/c) 08:39, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

21:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

19:41, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Majavah. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 01:41, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Cartmell (actor)

Hi Majavah,

I want to bring your attention to page James Cartmell (actor) that person has not done any verifiable work, and does not have much sources. Thank you ☆★Sunil Butolia (✉✉) 06:46, 23 January 2020 (UTC)sunilbutolia

@Sunilbutolia: Hi, please note that currently there is a strong consencus that the creator of an article should be notified if that article is proposed for deletion (see WP:PRODNOM). Additionally, that article has sources, so "unsourced" in the nomination is not true. Majavah (t/c) 07:09, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

18:53, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

20:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 12

19:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello Taavi,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources
Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

16:17, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Rosguill. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Allied Glass, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

signed, Rosguill talk 22:20, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Majavah. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 22:28, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

21:00, 24 February 2020 (UTC)