User talk:Tango/Archive10
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Darwin/Wedgwood arms
Can you check this out please Darwin–Wedgwood_family#Coat_of_Arms.Kittybrewster ☎ 10:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
An apology
Sorry if I'm bothering you or anything, but I wanted to apologize for starting an argument with you at your RfA a few months back. I completely understand where you were coming from — I find Wikipedia does tend to prioritize form over what needs to be done at times. I hope you didn't take the disagreement too personally. Master&Expert (Talk) 05:43, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- As I tried to explain in that RFA, I consider arguments to be a good thing. At least you engaged in some discussion and tried to back up what you were saying with some reasons - I thank you for that. --Tango (talk) 15:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with you. I think I may have judged you wrongly anyways. Master&Expert (Talk) 03:21, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Just to point out
You know, if you don't like something, please feel free to go away without making an inflammatory parting comment. Just because a theorist may not be able to adequately express all the details of his theory in a way that you can understand it, this should not lead to any conclusion about the theory itself as being a bad one. Rather what is indicated may be an impossible communication barrier between us which is neither of ours' fault. Labeling things as pseudo-whatever is not really as courteous as simply leaving without making opinionated remarks. (Just my opinion--I don't know if it's a real rule or anything) --Neptunerover (talk) 07:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Not that I didn't leave a childish edit summary. I apologise for that--my childishness. Sorry. --Neptunerover (talk) 10:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Your question to Jimbo Wales is a bit inappropriate. Jimmy, like everyone else involved with Wikipedia, has a right to do endorse whatever he wants. It is true that Jimmy Wales 'fame' - if you can call it that - is based on the success of Wikipedia. But that 'fame' does not belong to Wikipedia, that belongs to Mr. Wales. If Jimmy were to add advertisements to Wikipedia (something he can no longer do himself, but just as an example) then you could say he is using the work of contributors for personal gain. But any 'fame' he has belongs only to him, and its not appropriate to ask him how much money he is being paid or how much of it is going to his ventures in Wikia or Wikipedia, any more than it is to ask you how much money you've made and how much money you've donated to Wikipedia. Prodego talk 00:16, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I'm glad you asked that question. You might enjoy a column, magazine article excerpts, or a blog post, which go into some detail on these issues overall (I'm quite fond of the "commercalize the hell out of it" gem). -- Seth Finkelstein (talk) 07:29, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Deleted image
Hi, Tango! I was approached by User:TarzanASG today, who asked for this image to be restored. The only page with the information pertinent to this deletion seems to be this DRV. By the looks of it, there were two votes in favor of the undeletion, but the image remained deleted due to its being an office matter. However, you later stroke the office provision out, yet the image remained deleted (I assume no one cared enough to actually undelete it).
I am going to either restore this file or submit it for another DRV, but I thought I'd first consult you in case I'm missing something important. I'd appreciate your response. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:09, February 9, 2010 (UTC)
- The original DRV is now moot, since the WMF no longer uses that office. They have moved to a new office and, since that office has better security, they no longer try to keep the location secret. I can't see anyone objecting to it being undeleted, but I suggest you clarify with TarzanASG that he wants a photo of the old office. There are photos of the new office on commons, I believe. --Tango (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, Tango. I'll undelete that picture per the old DRV results. And yes, Mr. Tarzan wanted that particular image, although he didn't specify what for. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 20:40, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
- Proposal to Close This RfC
- Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy
Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:30, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
- In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Refdesk talk
Hi Tango, the actions at WT:REFDESK which I undertook and you reverted were carried out as I acted as an administrator. Please do not undo such actions without discussion and in particular please do not undo them again. My talk page is always open to discuss my edits, as is my email and various admin noticeboards. Thanks. Franamax (talk) 01:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- See WP:IAR. See, I can WikiLawyer too. --Tango (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- If you want to go there, I can play block-you-next-time too. Tango you have been there, you know very well what the appeal avenues are for banned users. I'm not going to ask you again. You know the avenues for appeal against administrative action. I'll protect WT:REFDESK if you want, 'til we get this sorted (at my version). I don't envision entertaining unban appeals at the refdesks, please gain consensus for such a notion. You know how to do it. Franamax (talk) 02:18, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Tango, the editor in this case was banned for very good reason, and he continues to harrass other editors and commit random acts of vandalism to this day. If you check the contributions of the user whose post you restored at WT:RD, you'll find that two minutes after his post there he went on to vandalize my user page. And of course, all that came after he was trolling (and blocked for his easily-identifiable scatalogical fixation and IP range) a few hours earlier. This is an individual who has been told on many, many occasions how to go about getting unbanned — but who isn't willing (or perhaps isn't able) to change his behaviour. The message he sees each time he is blocked provides ample instructions on how to appeal; we don't need to further entertain him on talk pages where he has a history of abuse. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 04:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
- Just to note... I agree that I would really like to answer LC's question about being unblocked, but I realize that the RD Talk page is not where it should be asked/answered. When blocked, LC is allowed to ask questions on his talk page. He has been told clearly what his offenses have been and what is required to remedy the situation. All he appears to be doing now is try to see if he can squeeze a post or two into the RD every now and then - Just to prove that he can get through the block. So, I don't see his question about being unbanned to be made in good faith. -- kainaw™ 04:50, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
- Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed
- News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
- News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Java
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
- News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs
- Dispatches: GA Sweeps end
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
- Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts
- News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page
- WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
- Sister projects: A handful of happenings
- WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
- News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup
- Features and admins: This week in approvals
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
File copyright problem with File:Bad-printout-for-ref-desk.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Bad-printout-for-ref-desk.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 21:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
- News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Printer Problem
Hey Tango,
Just returned to the wp:RD/C after a month in the dark untrod stacks of Wikipedia,;-) and I saw your post of the 17 April 2010. One possibility is that there used to be an option with printers for 'uni-directional printing', that is the head only prints in ONE direction, rather than as the head goes left-right and also as it returns right-left.
This eliminates any mis-alignment from 'slop' in the mechanicals moving the head.(at the cost of slower printing) Possibly applied more to old impact printers, where I likely have more experience. If such a setting exists in your printer driver or on the printer itself, try it out. I also have a strong feeling that the 'high qaulity print' settings may be unidirectional printing, as it is possibly still difficult to align the dots printed on the r-l return pass with the first l-r pass. Regards, --220.101.28.25 (talk) 09:25, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Happy Tango's Day!
User:Tango has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:39, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
RE: Accidental reversion
Hi Tango, i dont think we've encountered each other on wiki b4. My name is Hash (or Lil-unique1 as on here). Its ok, thanks for the apology and explaination. Its easily done - believe me! Can i offer you some advice? speed your archiveBOT up if your using one because your talk page is quite large lol. =) Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:14, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
- Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia
- News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news
- In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
- From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted
- Commons deletions: Porn madness
- Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide
- News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All
- In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Sorry
Sorry, I must have misunderstood what exactly the question was "getting" at. I took it to be some ostensible violation of conservation of angular momentum, which of course it isn't.--Leon (talk) 12:11, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
- News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum
- In the news: In the news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Feature name
Hello! Please see my new comments at Wikipedia talk:Flagged protection and patrolled revisions/Terminology. The more I think about it, the more I'm inclined to conclude that the write-in candidate "Revision Review" is the strongest option (as it incorporates the best elements of "Double Check" and "Pending Revisions"). —David Levy 19:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- As we can agree on "Revision Review," I think that we should formally withdraw our respective support of "Pending Revisions" and "Double Check." Because "Revision Review" is a write-in candidate, I'm worried that it otherwise will be ignored. This also would convey to future respondents that "Revision Review" is a viable option. —David Levy 20:29/20:30, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- I'm reluctant to do that in case the WMF decides they don't really want a write-in candidate. If they are going to choose between their two candidates, I'd like them to know which one I prefer. At the moment there has been very little discussion, I don't think there is much risk of any of it being missed. --Tango (talk) 20:35, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
- My concern is that "Revision Review" will be intentionally disregarded if "Pending Revisions" and "Double Check" appear viable enough. I'm not suggesting that we actually remove our comments (so which of the two we respectively prefer would remain clear), but striking our support would emphasize the superiority of a mutually acceptable option. —David Levy 23:24, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
- News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
- Photography: Making money with free photos
- News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Question regarding deleted articles
I'm not sure who to ask this, so I figured I would just ask you. If an article is deleted, it's not to be remade from what I understand. The article in question went through afd's twice, and got deleted which can be seen here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joe_Siegler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Joe_Siegler_2
But someone actually remade the article here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DOSGuy/Joe_Siegler it's a subset of someone's user profile, but they are essentially circumventing a deleted article. Is this against wikipedia policy? ScienceApe (talk) 01:56, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- I think that's ok. It was deleted as "not notable" and one of the things people that disagree with such a decision are advised to do is write the article in the user namespace until it is good enough to convince people that the subject is notable and then it can be moved to the main namespace (admins will often undelete the article and move it to a subpage of your user page so you don't have to start from scratch and so that the page history is preserved). I imagine that is what DOSGuy is doing. Had the article been deleted as a copyright violation or an attack page then recreating it in the user namespace would be a problem, but for deletions like this it is fine. If the article stays there without being worked on for a long time (a couple of months, say) then it should probably be deleted (in the first instance, a friendly reminder on the user's talk page would be the best approach). --Tango (talk) 02:09, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice. ScienceApe (talk) 15:20, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
- News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news
- In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
- Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content
- In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?
- Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
DOH!
Thanks for spotting my mistakes on the BEF page
I had it so that the war had not even started before they retreated lol Chaosdruid (talk) 23:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- You're welcome, but I can't take the credit. Someone came to the Reference Desk pointing it out: Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Humanities#Timeline_of_WW_II. --Tango (talk) 23:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
You have talk
you know, on jimbo's page about the barnstar of disagreement! check it out... Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 02:24, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010
- Wikimania preview: Gearing up for Wikimania in Gdańsk
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Children's Literature
- Features and admins: This week's highlights
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
- UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups
- News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hello
I thought this page might interest you (I've just supplied a solution for arithmetical surjections, as well as for arithmetical bijections). Take care, Good luck. HOOTmag (talk) 23:40, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
- News and notes: New interwiki project improves biographies, and other news
- In the news: Wikipedia leads in customer satisfaction, Google Translate and India, Citizendium transition, Jimbo's media accolade
- WikiProject report: These Are the Voyages of WikiProject Star Trek
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Discussion report: Controversial e-mail proposal, Invalid AfD
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
- News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports
- In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed
- WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
jetsons movie oppinion (invitation to my talk page
204.112.104.172 (talk) 08:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC) See my talk page and give your honest oppinions on the voice of judy on jetsons movie. I have a forem there under august 2010. invite others please as well. Thank you.
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 16 August 2010
- WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 23 August 2010
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Moved posts by User:114.72.252.52
Hiya Tango!How are ya mate?Can you please contact me?No hard feelings mate.
Tango,stop removing my questions please.If there's anything you dislike,please contact me at TheDude@gmail.com and I'll respond soon.Thankyou.THE DUDE (moved from userpage) — GorillaWarfare talk 05:17, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?
The Signpost: 6 September 2010
- Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky
- WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force
- Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th
- Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more
- Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management
YGM
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Connormah (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 September 2010
- News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more
- WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
- News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
The Signpost: 25 October 2010
- News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced
- In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news
- WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?
- Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 1 November 2010
- In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric
- WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey
- Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails
- Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days
- Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news
The Signpost: 8 November 2010
- News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity
- WikiProject report: WikiProject California
- Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science
- Election report: The countdown begins
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 15 November 2010
- News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership
- WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon
- Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains
- Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 22 November 2010
- News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations
- Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder
- WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Candidates still stepping forward
- Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 29 November 2010
- In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report
- WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Voting in full swing
- Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
UK Community Notice - IRC meeting
Dear Wikipedian,
This is the first of what will hopefully be a regular notice to help bring together the UK community so that you can be involved in some amazing things. To kick things off, there will be a UK community IRC meeting at 1800 UTC, December 7, 2010 to discuss the future growth and developement of Wikimedia UK. Without huge community support and involvement, the chapter cannot be successful and to get the most out of it, get involved.
For information on the community IRC meeting please go here
More to come about:
- Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Events
- 1st Annual UK Wiki-conference
- Trustee interest meeting - an event for those community members with even just a fleeting interest in becoming trustees of Wikimedia UK.
Many Thanks
- Joseph Seddon
- User:Seddon
Delivered by WMUKBot (talk) on 05:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
UK IRC community meeting
Just a quick reminder about the IRC meeting at 1800 UTC tonight to bring together the Wikimedia community in the UK to help the growth and success of the UK chapter and community activities. For information see wmuk:Community_IRC_meetings
- Many Thanks
- Joseph Seddon
Delivered by WMUKBot (talk) on 17:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
Welcome back
Wow, 4 months and 2 ISPs. I'd have torn out what's left of my hair by then.
Don't know if you're aware, but shortly after your extended break started, some joker advised all and sundry that the reason you'd stopped editing was that you'd died. Heaven forbid! It looked reasonably genuine on the surface, but it was deleted as needing evidence. I'm very glad to see they were just a troll. -- Jack of Oz ... speak! ... 03:37, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I am aware. I have been logging in occasionally from places with public wifi and from work (but with limited time, the reference desks had to fall by the wayside) and discovered that a bunch of edits to my user page had been oversighted. I made some enquiries and discovered what had happened. Very amusing! --Tango (talk) 15:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
- Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News