User talk:Tary123/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Welcome
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
|
Teahouse Invitation
|
Hello! Tary123,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:20, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
|
Advertisement
 | |
| Wikipedia ads | file info – show another – #48 |
Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.
Click here to be taken to the survey site.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!
Happy editing,
Jonathan and Sarah, Teahouse hosts 02:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:24, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chennai Super Kings-Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Arthur goes shopping (talk) 17:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Chennai Super Kings-Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry
Hello, Tary123! I'm Huon. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Chennai Super Kings-Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry.
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chennai Super Kings-Royal Challengers Bangalore rivalry. Huon (talk) 15:43, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi Think the problem is u have only made this article about statistics recored. Just write more about this rivalry and why it was made such big rivalry like season 2 semifinal knockout or a fan burning csk flag. and few close matches in season 5 and 6. Only by writing atleast 2 paragraphs will be good. For reference check Dodgers-giants rivalry. new York Yankees- mets, Chicago cubs- white sox rivalry and write it. Good luck you can bring a best article. Also try to write something about Mumbai Indians - Chennai super kings rivalry too. I think it is much bigger than RCB-CSK rivalry — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.125.98.93 (talk) 21:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Help test new SuggestBot design
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low 
to High 
, while for quality the scale goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:56, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
G5 speedy deletion
Hi Tary123, and thanks for tagging Ortosar for speedy deletion. It definitely fit the G11 criterion. However, it did not fit G5. See the description of that criterion, where it emphasizes it's only for creations of banned or blocked users "in violation of their ban or block." Ortostar was indeed the creation of a blocked user, but that alone is insufficient for speedy deletion. The article would've had to been created after the user was blocked—i.e., if an Ortostar2 popped up and created the page after Ortostar's block. A blocked user doesn't automatically have all of his or her creations deleted, although in many cases they will be for other reasons. I hope this doesn't sound too harsh. The page has been speedily deleted; I just wanted you to know that about G5. (Don't worry—I've almost made the same mistake.) Like G4, it's difficult to know for sure if it's applicable if you don't have administrative privileges. Anyway, keep up the good work. Your vigilance in screening bad articles is appreciated. --BDD (talk) 18:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks for letting me know! I'll try not to repeat the mistake. --Tary123 (talk) 18:20, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |