User talk:Tckma/Archives/July 2010

Narendra Modi

The para added by the anon, that I removed:

The nature of the events that occured in Gujarat in 2002 remains politically controversial in India.Many people have criticised the Gujarat Government especially the Indian media for tarnishing the image of "Indian Secularism",but it must be said that the riots cannot be called genocide as some commentators have suggested because the riots were a reaction to the evil actions of a Muslim mob that had no respect for the law,a Muslim mob that felt that burning innocent Hindu women and children was justified and then abusing the Hindu women and raping them was justified,it was this Muslim mob that brought out the violent side of the peaceful Hindu people of Gujarat

I removed this as it is a clear case of WP:POV. Any reason why my edit was reverted? --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

• Hmmm. This was not the edit I intended to revert. I was trying to undo an unreviewed change via Special:OldReviewedPages that was an incomplete POV sentence in broken English starting with "He stands for 2nd election..." I'm still trying to get the hang of this "reviewer" privelege. My understanding with unreviewed changes is that you use "rollback" if you don't agree with the change. I'm not sure why this rolled back your change when I wasn't even seeing that text. Tckma (talk) 15:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
• In this diff, line 48 was my only intended reversion... but it seems to have added the text. This was the only diff I saw on the pending revisions page. Tckma (talk) 15:30, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

It seems that until the first version was not reviewed. All other edits including your and mine were marked as not reviewed. So the confusion resulted. Good day. Cya. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 15:44, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Can you check Wikipedia:Pending_changes/Feedback#Confusion_on_Narendra_Modi and add to your version (what you observed)? Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:05, 27 July 2010 (UTC)