User talk:Tearstar
I am jjust starting this so there is nothing here yet, but any ideas of what should be included here, please let me know.
You might see WP:WEB, I believe an internet-based game would generally be covered by those guidelines. The gist is though that it should be included if its been written about or reviewed by well-known publications or websites. Wikipedia is not a directory of every game, website, etc. --W.marsh 00:09, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Removed deletion opinion per your request as nominator, though I don't think anyone did a good job of actually justifying this article's existence.--Isotope23 13:19, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
The article Lucifer's Unholy Desire has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable film lacking GHits and GNEWs of substance. Fails WP:NOTFILM.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 05:46, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Lucifer's Unholy Desire for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lucifer's Unholy Desire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucifer's Unholy Desire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ttonyb (talk) 13:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
You need some detailed coverage in two or three reliable sources before this can go into mainspace. Spartaz Humbug! 17:35, 12 June 2011 (UTC)