User talk:TechNerd22

This is TechNerd22's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Cash (YouTuber) (December 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Cash (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Steve Cash (YouTuber), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 04:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TechNerd22! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 04:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Cash (YouTuber) (December 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

zero reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Cash (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Steve Cash (YouTuber), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:12, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Cash (YouTuber) (December 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:ANYBIO - YouTube is not an acceptable or reliable source. Even if they were acceptable sources the official Talking Kitty Cat YouTube channel, and an interview with Steve Cash would both be considered as primary sources which are not acceptable or independent. The fact that you can not find any other acceptable or reliable sources just reinforces the fact that the individual is not notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Cash (YouTuber) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Steve Cash (YouTuber), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:35, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Steve Cash (YouTuber) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Steve Cash (YouTuber). Thanks! SK2242 (talk) 15:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Corner Brook Intermediate moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Corner Brook Intermediate, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 07:17, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Corner Brook Intermediate has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Corner Brook Intermediate. Thanks! davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 🎄 01:23, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IP user[edit]

Even through I am not a administrator, or a user that helps out in the WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk, I think that that IP user was not allowed to edit your draft because the draft wasn't there's. I believe only administrator's are allowed to edit the draft. You did a good job reverting the edits, and I will leave a alert on the IP user's talk page.JennilyW (talk) 03:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

She's wrong. You left a note asking for help. I helped. You reverted me. See WP:OWN. An article about any institution is about the institution, not the people associated with it. Content about fights in a local mall wouldn't be topical for any subject except the mall. (And most likely not even there. See WP:NOTNEWS.) Just an aside: generally only high schools get articles. I'm absolutely certain this school isn't notable (in the sense "notable" is used on Wikipedia) and spending more of anyone's time on it is futile. Notability is required, and that's a property of the subject you've chosen, not a reflection on your skills. Very very few lower schools ever qualify for an article, and for the most part, most of those that do qualify for a reason unrelated to the school institution. Being in a building that is on a national historic registry, being in a building that has won a major architectural award, being the location of some historic event; those are some of the many non school things lower schools get articles for. Just being a school, not so much. If you want to give it up, just paste {{Db-G7}} at the top of the draft. I wish I could help you more, but you can't make a silk purse from a sow's ear. 174.254.192.137 (talk) 04:41, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, TechNerd22, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! --Worldbruce (talk) 04:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corner Brook Intermediate (July 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Added sources are press release and announcements. Please refer to WP:ROUTINE for future reference.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Corner Brook Intermediate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Corner Brook Intermediate, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:05, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Corner Brook Intermediate[edit]

Hello, TechNerd22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Corner Brook Intermediate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]