User talk:Teomotto

November 2013[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Japan Today, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Also, please observe WP:NPOV SFK2 (talk) 04:33, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. SFK2 (talk) 04:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

== The Cover Up section is not uncredited. Please check the source. Do not boss around.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Japan Today. Jim1138 (talk) 04:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

== I'll take this to the press. You are behaving like bullies!

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Teomotto reported by User:John Cline (Result: ). Thank you. —John Cline (talk) 04:53, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]