User talk:Tequendamia

To see old discussions:

• 2005
• 2005-2009

New discussions

New comments here:

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Álvaro Uribe. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Your move violated WP:BLP. --Túrelio (talk) 13:37, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point

Moving Álvaro Uribe to Lumpenpresident Álvaro Uribe would appear to be a textbook example of disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point. It has been requested that your account be blocked for vandalism, and I am sorely tempted to do so. — Kralizec! (talk) 13:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Hola

Hola Tequendamia, siempre admire tus trabajos en Wikipedia en español aunque ya no edites ahi; sabias que existen otros 6 proyectos importantes aparte de la Wikipedia (el mas famoso), mi pregunta es ¿en cual de estos 6 proyectos podemos editar juntos? me respondes en mi discusion por favor. Saludos -- Globalphilosophy (talk) 04:30, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hola amigo, sabes yo tambien fui expulsado de la Wikipedia en español por algun motivo; no se si te interesara esta lista que yo hice de los usuarios expulsados, esta lista la comenze a ordenar en mi cuenta en español. Saludos Globalphilosophy (talk) 19:51, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Tambien me puedes escribir a mi correo que es poesiamundial@hotmail.com Saludos -- Globalphilosophy (talk) 20:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of official languages by GDP per capita

I have nominated List of official languages by GDP per capita, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of official languages by GDP per capita. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. LordPistachio ^talk 01:44, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CIVETS

The article CIVETS has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NEO; this dates from mid-July.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Ravenswing  03:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Copa Americas

The article Copa Americas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pure speculation, entirely unsourced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin McE (talk) 09:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Hyperpower

Hi there, your edits to the page Hyperpower are disruptive. If you would like to change the article in a controversial way like removing the US, first discuss on the talk page. It's not considered good practice to simply remove long standing content with no discussion. Thanks for your time. G.R. Allison (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Social Progress Index, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Social Progress Index" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:50, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Topologia Ciclorutas.GIF

Thank you for uploading File:Topologia Ciclorutas.GIF. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Lemote for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lemote is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lemote until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 07:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Social Progress Index

Hey. I was thinking of dividing the list of countries according to SPI into its tiers, as according to this source: http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/pt/data/spi/findings

Maybe by colour (like in the list of countries by Democracy Index) or in separate tables (like in HDI)? Could you help me with that?

Califate123 (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Selective assassination listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Selective assassination. Since you had some involvement with the Selective assassination redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 16:43, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Operation Balboa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Balboa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation Balboa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

NoonIcarus (talk) 21:19, 12 June 2022 (UTC)