User talk:TheBawbb
Welcome![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, TheBawbb! Thank you for your contributions. I am Astrocog and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! AstroCog (talk) 16:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot[edit]
|
Hi TheBawbb! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Nocturnes (Satie) has been accepted[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:34, 6 October 2014 (UTC)- The article was great, except for one thing: at times it came across as a bit of a personal paper on Nocturnes as opposed to a neutral and encyclopedic article. It was well written and I liked it personally, but you've got to be careful that you write in a more formal and neutral manner. Using terms such as facetious (in composition) and sentences like "The inscrutable qualities of the Nocturnes have hindered their mainstream popularity among Satie's works" can be seen as personal opinion and original research. You've got to be very, very careful about that. I've changed those two elements since they were the only two that really stood out and approved the article, but you've just got to be careful about that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:38, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
A cookie for you![edit]
|
I just finished reviewing La Diva de l'Empire, an article you recently created, and thought that it was really well written and researched. Please keep up the good work. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:58, 9 October 2014 (UTC) |
Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews[edit]
Hello TheBawbb. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello TheBawbb!
Thank you for contacting me. I rated the article as C-Class because it has a sufficient length and proper formatting structure to be above Start-class. It is properly referenced and has sufficient quality in its writing. I believe the page to be above start class but not long enough for a B. I should add that "C-Class" is not similar to receiving a "C Grade" in the American education system. C-Class in Wikipedia indicates the page is of a proficient quality. If you believe the page should be assessed higher you should consider finding a user who has an expertise in music history to reassess. Hope this clears things up.
- DaltonCastle (talk) 03:25, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Editor's Barnstar |
| Thanks for La belle excentrique Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you[edit]
Thank you for writing Descriptions automatiques, Pièces froides, Sports et divertissements, Nocturnes, and Sarabandes. Hftf (talk) 11:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
A page you started (Trois poèmes d'amour) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Trois poèmes d'amour, TheBawbb!
Wikipedia editor Liechtenstein96 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Hi, a very informative article. Thx :) I think a link to french speaking wiki would be nice since the title is french. -> In the lead, there is a fitting citation needed. Kind regards, Liechtenstein96 (talk) 14:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
To reply, leave a comment on Liechtenstein96's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Women in Music[edit]
| Women in Music | |
|---|---|
 |
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 04:37, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you ![edit]
Hello TheBawbb,
I am also a fan of Monsieur Erik Satie — and I always enjoy playing the music of the same Monsieur (as he would enjoy being referred to 
)
As I am currently correcting the template for the drawing where Satie paints DieuBussy (...is dead) on a wall, on Commonns, it gives me great pleasure to find that you have posted this very drawing on your page. If you are interested in other, similar caricatures, this was drawn for the (sadly, French) article on Nicolas Slonimsky's famous anthology, the Lexicon of Musical Incvective.
Thank you for your appreciation.
Best regards, Flopinot2012 (talk) 20:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, TheBawbb. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, TheBawbb. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Quatre petites mélodies (Satie) has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 13:55, 27 September 2018 (UTC)A page you started (Trois Mélodies (Satie)) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Trois Mélodies (Satie), TheBawbb!
Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
An interesting article.
To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, TheBawbb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, TheBawbb
Thank you for creating Salut drapeau!.
User:Vexations, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Vexations}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Vexations (talk) 17:04, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)