User talk:TheChunky/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Chewdara

I probably added more reliable citations in article Chewdara, check them. Please Ttttt321 (talk). 13:59, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ttttt321, Great to know. I have checked the Chewdara. I have added some more tags between sections having incomplete information and some need citation to verify the information. Please address these tags and ping me here. I will remove the tags. Thank you. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

hii..i added all the citations except one, there is no reliable citation for that but that article is present in wikipedia, then what will i do? Ttttt321 (talk). 11:07, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ttttt321, You added mostly unreliable sources by replacing Citation Needed tags. This is not good. YouTube is not a reliable source. I suggest you to remove that one completely. And don't remove the "Citation Needed" tags without replacing them with citation. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

I have removed the educational Institutions which should not be on wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a travel guide or directory which have unwanted stuff in it. Everything here is based on sources which should be reliable. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

ok, but you removed the "schools in chewdara" which were with reliable citations and if i add the wikipedias link to any subject instead of citation? Ttttt321 (talk). 18:15, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Is this (Chewdara) ok now...? check it... Ttttt321 (talk). 12:33, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Ttttt321, Well, schools in the Chewdara section had some unwanted stuff there. I have kept those which seem to be reliable. However, every website is not considered as reliable. Please see Reliable Sources for more info. Now, let's talk about Baba Naseeb-ud-Din Ghazi whose article is present on wiki, but the article doesn't have a single sentence that suggests that this shrine has any links to Chewdara. Please find a source which says that this shrine is in Chewdara. Another thing is that the References 4, 5, and 7 seem to be duplicates of each other. Please use citation and try using <ref name="abc"> before starting the references which you need to put in different places in that article. Then you don't need to add citations in all places. You can add the citation at one and the shortcode at other places. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

Is this ok now? Chewdara. Ttttt321 (talk). 07:08, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Please go through my previous comment again. You have not finished yet.— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

can you show me where is citation need, now? please Ttttt321 (talk). 07:46, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Check it Chewdara, where it has been completed or not? Ttttt321 (talk). 14:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, hope you are doing well. The citation no. 3 which you added for sourcing the lead section, but the lead doesn't need citation, as it is a brief section of what is written in other sections. The 3rd citation is about Poonch district and I don't know why you added that there. Now, citation no. 6 is a book which refers to the whole of Kashmir. Maybe inside there is a Chewdara section. Please prefer adding that Page No. in that citation which clearly shows the geography of Chewdara. Now, another thing is the Transport section. It includes two references which don't say anything about Chewdara. They are just about the railways and airports in Kashmir generally. There is not a single mention of Chewdara. And the third issue is section Mosques, where you have placed a citation from Kashmir Crown's Facebook video. Well, it doesn't have a very urgent need for citation, but Facebook or other social media platforms are not reliable sources. Please remove that Facebook citation. That's it. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

I suggest copying the way from Bhalessa's Transport section and collecting some details about how to reach Chewdara from any sources and adding them to the transport section, like Bhalessa has, which is better than the current information. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

Thankyou for suggesting, but i checked all the references in Bhalessa, search from references i found nothing about chewdara. Ttttt321 (talk). 07:59, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Then it means the transport section don't have any information about Chewdara? It can be removed. See the others things till then which I told above. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

I have added needful information in Transport section, now please address other issues which I have mentioned above. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

 Thank you...  for adding information in chewdara      Ttttt321 (talk). 07:07, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

hii, is Chewdara has been completed? Ttttt321 (talk). 07:54, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Tehreek i Soutul Auwliya

Hii, can you help me in this draft Draft:Tehreek i Soutul Auwliya, please? Ttttt321 (talk). 16:23, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Ttttt321 Thanks for inviting for contributing this draft. As I can see there is lot of changes which are necessary there. I think we should also invite TheAafi for helping you in this draft, he is expert in these types of wiki articles. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

Ttttt321, TheChunky Sorry both of you. I reviewed the draft and had to sadly decline it this time. This needs to be sources with better sources which discuss the organisation significantly. Thanks. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 17:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

I did however copy edit the article to make it sound better. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 17:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Ttttt321 Please don't submit this draft until it meets notability criteria. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

TheAafi Thanks. Sure, the creator of this draft and I will find the better sources regarding this. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 17:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

thank you Ttttt321 (talk). 17:34, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi Ttttt321, can you please check the website you added on Draft: Tehreek-e-Soutul Auwliya. I don't think it is working! Was it working when you added? Regards. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 18:01, 25 August 2021 (UTC) Hii, i removed tHe website and now can i submit it. Ttttt321 (talk). 16:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

TheAafi, please check this draft. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

Rollback granted

Hi TheChunky. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~TNT (she/they • talk) 08:09, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank You. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 13:51, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Syed Ali Shah Geelani. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Kautilya3 (talk) 22:26, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Atul Raghav

Hi,TheChunky (talk · contribs) Thanks for the edits. Can you please help me to improve the articles of Indian Taekwondo Players. If this article gets accepted then we can create more articles of Indian combat Players. I cross verified from different reliable sources and its's confirmed that he is the youngest athlete from ghaziabad who played in ranking events and won medal. Can it be mentioned? If you have any extra reliable information about Atul Raghav, you can add it in the main description section.--Divineplus (talk) 09:50, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for inviting me to contribute in Indian Taekwondo. As I have read what you wrote in the Draft:Atul Raghav, everything is going fine but please keep WP:NPOV in mind while writing. For example, we can't praise someone in an article like "He is a good boy". We can write "He is a boy and he do this or that". Other than that everything seems to be good. And I will contribute for sure. Thanks again. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 17:57, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

thank you for the response and the edits you made to help the draft more precise,TheChunky (talk · contribs). Draft:Atul Raghav has not been reviewed yet. can it be done from your side so that i can keep contributing towards indian taekwondo players? what are your opinion, can it be accepted?Divineplus (talk) 09:14, 8 September 2021 (UTC).

Deborah Santana copyright issues

Hi TheChunky, Thank you for reviewing my page for Deborah Santana and alerting me to the copyright infringement issues. I have re-written the article to remove the copyrighted text and resubmitted it for consideration. Can you please let me know if what I did was good enough, or if I need to make more changes to make it acceptable? Thanks so much, --Moviecat (talk) 22:50, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Moviecat, There is still 38% above copied text on Draft:Deborah Santana, you can check [here]. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

And please remove unreliable sources like IMDb (See WP:IMDB), The articles must establish notability about the person with reliable sources (See WP:RS). — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 02:17, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for responding, TheChunky! I have removed all the IMDb sources and added some new ones instead. I have also changed the wording to remove more of the copyrighted text. Now, when I check the Copyvios tool (thank you very much for that, by the way!), the only similarities I can find are things like book/article/film titles. I am using this Temp page to make changes. I am under the impression that I should make all my changes to that Temp page rather than resubmitting the Draft article, is that correct? Thank you so much for your help! --Moviecat (talk) 00:45, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi TheChunky. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Rosguill Thank you. ❤️ — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

from what you can see

when a new article is created by a 32 edit user, usually a prod is much more productive than Afd - which really is a WP:BITE action on a new user and discouraged at all times. Also a good reason for a supposed limitation is the full company name is not given in title or lead and is a term so common anywhere it is not possible to judge anything agaihst such a name. Really, it should be speedily kept and we could all move on to more productive work - if you stay with it - that's your problem, but for an operation to have the extent of operations - railway transport, lithium mines and iron ore - I for one cannot understand where it fails anything. Hey have a good day! JarrahTree 07:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

JarrahTree Thanks for the message here. During the evaluation of the references on that article, I didn't find any reliable sources which showed its notability. But as you said, the article's name is a common name, which misled me to do the AfD. Now I am going to withdraw my AfD, but please add some more reliable sources to the article. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️)

I can understand the frustration - and indeed the name was incorrect and would lead to some difficult disambiguation issues down the line - so thanks for moving - also - be very careful with new users. I will over time will attempt to add new references where possible - keep up the good work - and take care... JarrahTree 09:25, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tehreek-e-Soutul Auwliya (September 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by TrangaBellam was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

TrangaBellam (talk) 13:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

Hello TheChunky,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Deborah Santana paid contributor tag

You removed the {{Paid contributions}} tag on the recently mainspaced Deborah Santana article. Does that mean you have reviewed the article for COI neutrality in the writing? If so, can you update the {{Connected contributor (paid)}} template on her Talk:Deborah Santana page? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for message. I have already placed the concerned tag on talk page. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️)

Thanks! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 05:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tehreek-e-Soutul Auwliya has been accepted

Tehreek-e-Soutul Auwliya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 08:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Mary-Beth Sharp

You declined this draft several hours ago. I found the draft it when I came to write the article and have completely rewritten the body text. I'd be glad if you could take another look at it please. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asif Iqbal Naik (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asif Iqbal Naik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Asif Iqbal Naik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 22:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Article: Atul Raghav

Hi TheChunky (talk · contribs). I would like to invite you for an discussion on Article: Atul Raghav as it has been nominated for deletion. Kindly share your thought and help me to save the article. It's happeing due to non-notability of Taekwondo in India.Divineplus (talk) 05:19, 9 October 2021 (UTC).

Draft:The Association of Private Museums of Russia

Hello! What should I do ro publish my draft. Should I only remove non-reliable sources or something else? --Priestone (talk) 12:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Priestone,

I think you should read the following:

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.

Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup

Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references

Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article

Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article

Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources.

These things might help you in re-writing the Draft:The Association of Private Museums of Russia. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 16:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Thank you. I've deleted the non-reliable links from the article. Other sources, mostly in Russian, are reliable issues. Please review my article.--Priestone (talk) 06:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Priestone Hi, I am still finding that how the article is notable. When I check in the Google News here, not a single news find the article title! Can you explain, how it is notable and under which criteria? — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

Please Read WP:NGO,your draft should pass this criteria atleast. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

TheChunky Do you mean to say that Russian sources are not reliable for the article in English? --Priestone (talk) 17:50, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

I asked for explanation, how you believe it is notable. How you evaluate the sources. I don't know Russian. But it doesn't means Russian sources are not reliable. They can be reliable. Please explain. Thanks. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

TheChunky The sources in the article are mostly Russian. That's because this artile is about Russian association. I can explain your some moments about the links in the article. For example link 2 follows to Russian Museums catalogue, links 3 and 12 follow to Russian Ministry of culture website, link 4 follows to one of the main Russian broadcasting services "Radio Russia" and so on. I've tried to include only reliable russian sources in the article--Priestone (talk) 17:01, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Great, did you checked WP:NGO? Whether your draft follow the criteria? ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

TheChunky Of course. The Association includes more than 700 museums from all over Russia. You can view it on the website privatemuseums.ru/en/catalog. Also all sources in the article are the independent media.

Hello. Can I publish our draft in Wiki? We discussed all criteria, and, in my opinion, the article follows them--Priestone (talk) 06:12, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Priestone If you believe it follows the criteria, please submit it for AfC and left for reviewing process. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:35, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

TheChunky Hello. I've resubmitted the draft of the article --Priestone (talk) 18:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

TheChunky Hello. How long should I wait the revision of the draft?--Priestone (talk) 12:07, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi Priestone, I was not much active these days due to some real world reasons. You can get help on WikiProject Russia for your Russia related article. Also, you can ask any of the members of that WikiProject here. Hope you will get helped. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 01:54, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ramban district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ramban.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Humanity's Last Breath

Hi, TheChunky. 51 days ago you declined my draft due to a lack of sources. I made major improvements to the sourcing, but the article has still not been re-reviewed or accepted. May you please have a look?

Highly appreciated, Elias --Elias9922 (talk) 11:22, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shah Huzaib has been accepted

Shah Huzaib, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 03:50, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Request on 05:45:58, 18 December 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Mwill66

Mwill66 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Hume's Pass (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Review of Draft:Hume's Pass. The reviewer appears not to comprehend the nature of the information presented in this draft. It is entirely an assembly of the independent writings of the original authors who published their journals and maps in 1824 and 1825. It has been acclaimed in Australia because after 197 years it finally reveals what the authors Hamilton Hume and Captain William Hilton Hovell actually meant by their personal work all of those years ago. It has been made possible by a highly detailed analysis of the archaic compass bearings of 1824 that they wrote with. There is not a shred of my opinion in it. It is set up to convey the encylopaedic facts about about the most important journey of discovery ever made in inland Australia, the one that made Australia commercially viable in agriculture for the first time. The reviewer seems not to have noticed that Hume's Pass was named by Hume and Hovell on the 13th December, 1824, yet the location had been lost for 197 years. The entirety of the citations are of the highest quality of primary source documents that exist in Australia. Martin Williams

Mwill66 (talk) 05:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

It might be notable but please check the tag I added there. Orignal work of anyone is not allowed on wiki. It needs articles from primary and secondary sources. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chenab Times (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Jeromeenriquez were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Chenab Times and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Chenab Times, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 16:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jeromeenriquez (talk) 16:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey Jeromeenriquez, It's okay, I thought it was likely notable now, because I work on WikiProject Chenab Valley. and this is one of the articles from that project. I submitted this draft after 1.5 years when it fell under the notability criteria. Well, no worries. I will improve it more and resubmit it after it gets more notable for having Wikipedia. Thanks. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 01:40, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Hey, it is a notable subject but the problem is the awareness. keep it open for editing by everyone and i will also be able to add something to it. i work on WikiProject Jammu and Kahmir so i am aware of the region and happenings. Keep improving it and let me know to review it. Write more about Jammu and Kashmir as well. Happy editing. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 04:29, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Jeromeenriquez Thanks for letting me know. All drafts are open to edit by anyone by default. You are also welcome to improve Draft:The Chenab Times, so that it can be reviewed. And yes, I also improve articles from WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir and I have also created many new articles of places in J&K. Well, Chenab Valley is also part of this state, I am focusing on this region because there are many notable articles which should be on wiki. I am trying my best to add them. Thanks again. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 09:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is this articles sufficient to be in mainspace?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chenab Times (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Chenab Times and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Chenab Times, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 03:41, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

RPSkokie, Thanks for review. Based on your evaluation, I disagree with the decision. Let me clear, I am working on a WikiProject Chenab Valley and the above draft is related to that. I am working on this draft from past one and half year. I am using only informative and reliable information there.

Based on my evaluation, the references 1,4,6,9,18,19,20 and 21 are reliable and independent sources of newspapers and reliable news media. So this generate notability. There nothing like advertisement. Hope you will check this. Thanks and regards. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 16:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft: Time (Five album)

How does this fair now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:331F:C301:A0FB:5139:DEDC:1B87 (talk) 13:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Narwal (February 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

yet to win any major election, fails WP:NPOL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradeep Narwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pradeep Narwal, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 17:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

WP:AFC Helper News

Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.

AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.

Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi TheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article declined, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Features for new users coming soon (and mentors, like you, wanted!)

Hello. As you're currently listed as a host at the Teahouse, I wanted to make sure you're aware of the imminent rollout of new Growth Team Features which every new account will be getting by default. Each users will soon see a new 'Homepage' tab next to their User page. It contains two main elements which might impact on your involvement - and you'd be welcome to get involved and help out directly with one of them.

Firstly, they will be offered a range of 'suggested edits', and encouraged to make simple improvements to pages that interest them. (Being aware of this feature would be helpful for all Teahouse hosts if you're likely to offer advice on tasks for them to start out doing.)
There's also a 'Your impact' box to show them how many people have seen the pages they've just edited.
Finally, each new user is randomly assigned a 'mentor' from a list of friendly, experienced editors, like yourself. If they get stuck, they can ask a question directly to them via a Your mentor box, and hopefully get a swift, friendly answer from that mentor. Currently, this feature is given to 2% of new users, but it's set to increase to around 10% in the very near future.

To spread the load on our current list of around 65 mentors, I'm reaching out to ask if you'd like to help out and sign up as one? The workload is relatively small; User Panini! reports receiving four questions a month, on average, all of which were simple ones of the type we already get at the Teahouse, whilst I've had just one in the last 3 weeks. To view a list of every question asked of all mentors over the last 14 days, click here.

If becoming a mentor and being available to help new users on their first few days here interests you - just as have done at the Teahouse in the past - then please consider signing up at Growth Team features/Mentor list. But please only do so if you are genuinely willing to be available to help. Existing users can already 'opt-in' to seeing the Newcomer Homepage features via their Preferences.

Thank you! Nick Moyes (talk) 11:45, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Kishtwar article

Hi The Chunky, sorry to bother you. I am leaving this message as you are an active contributor to the Kishtwar article. An anonymous ip user has been making since several days unsourced changes to the page. Can you have a look into it ? The same ip user left me a message on my talk page insulting my person. Thank you. Imranqazi90 (talk) 07:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for conveying me. Upon check that article, another contributor has reverted the edit. I will also keep eye on it. Don't worry. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 09:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chenab Valley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ramban and Doda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

Hello TheChunky,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 809 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Chenab Times has been accepted

The Chenab Times, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Most Comfortable Chair 14:13, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Help me in improving my first draft

Hi, hope you are doing well. I have checked your profile and found that you are editing various places in Chenab Valley and I have started a draft of a village in the same region Draft: Badanoo . If you can contribute or help in improving this, I shall be thankful. Thanks. ManhasArvindKattar (talk) 07:16, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

You can add your username in that Wiki Project also. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 07:26, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Hello ManhasArvindKattar, thanks for dropping this message here. I want to let you know that I am working on Wikipedia: WikiProject Chenab Valley and you are also welcome to contribute articles in that project. The above draft you mentioned will be added in this project as it belongs to it. I would love to contribute articles like these. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 07:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Danish Manzoor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danish Manzoor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danish Manzoor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AlexandruAAlu (talk) 13:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

Hello TheChunky,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000^[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.^[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 9317 articles, as of 16:00, 26 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:02, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Chenab River seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol \| July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of The Chenab Times for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Chenab Times is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Chenab Times until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Maihuwikieditor (talk) 13:50, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Confirmation, please

A very angry person from the Chenab Times came on live help chat and said he paid you to write an article about them, and also that you promised it would be up forever.

Is this true? DS (talk) 14:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @DragonflySixtyseven, I feel that this is an attack on The Chenab Times and that angry person is associated with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thamesinfotech (just feeling). Their credentials should be verified through VRTS to proceed further. We cannot just loose a passionate volunteer just because someone claims "they're from CT and they paid him". ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 08:37, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

CT would seriously not want their page be deleted from here by alleging that they paid the article creator, who wrote it for them, at least when the creator didn't try to get the article deleted (then it's understandable that they'd report that they had paid for it). This report is vexatious and nonsense and should be disregarded, imho. ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 08:41, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

False Allegations: What? I made that article under a WikiProject, i.e Wikipedia:WikiProject Chenab Valley. This is funny enough. First of all, I have been doing volunteer editing on wikipedia for 2 years. And the fun part of your message is "If I was paid for it, then why would any person from the subject tell you or anyone on wikipedia that I got paid?" I recently checked that a user who is a sockpuppet has damaged a number of articles from different accounts and has also nominated The Chenab Times for deletion. That's a sockpuppet who's damaging Wikipedia. And maybe the same guy was messaging you.

A simple solution is to take the real ID of that person and verify it with The Chenab Times staff list. If it is found, then it is discussable, but I don't think that this is the matter. This is simply the harassment of Wikipedia editors by such sockpuppets.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 09:51, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

That's fine. I'll take you at your word, thank you. Hope you understand that I had to ask. DS (talk) 13:02, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pradeep Narwal

Hello, TheChunky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pradeep Narwal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Asif Iqbal Naik (July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hako9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Coverage revolves around his role in a single event WP:BLP1E. Doesn't have significant coverage to justify WP:JOURNALIST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Asif Iqbal Naik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- hako9 (talk) 13:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

Hello TheChunky,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination: MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers: The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:25, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi TheChunky,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi TheChunky. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Rosguill. I will leave a message on your talk page if I require any assistance in the future. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Narwal (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradeep Narwal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 03:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Akevsharma (talk) 03:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kishtwar district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marwah.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive is on!

You are receiving this message because you signed up to participate in the drive, but have not yet reviewed any pages in October. We would love to see you over at the backlog drive! Buidhe 10:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Early end of the backlog drive

A few days ago, new page patrollers got the backlog to zero. Due to the unprecedented success of the backlog drive, it will be ending early—at the end of 24 October, or in approximately two hours.

Barnstars will be awarded as soon as the coords can tally the results. Streak awards will be allocated based on the first three weeks of the drive, with the last three days being counted as part of week three.

Great work everyone! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Award

		The Invisible Barnstar
		This award is given to TheChunky for collecting more than 5 points doing reviews and re-reviews, in the October NPP backlog reduction drive. Thank you for your contributions. Zippybonzo \| Talk (he\|him) 08:39, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 14:18, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Shibnote

Hello, TheChunky,

Thank you for creating Shibnote.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

None of the sources refer to this as a village, and there is not enough in-depth coverage to show it passes GNG.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@Onel5969:, thanks for the message. This is an officially recognised village in Doda's Thathri sub district. I will surely add citation to improve notability. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 12:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Onel5969:, I have added more citations that verify the village. Actually, the citations added there already made it a notable village because of rafting events. There are news citations from 2021 and 2022 that covered the Chenab White Water Rafting Festival organised by the deputy commissioner of the Doda district. So, I don't think notability tag should be added there. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 13:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi. There are two issues, first, still none of the sources mention that this is a village. They all refer to it as an "area". Then there is the question of notability, and to show that you need to have several articles (at least 3) that go in-depth about it. Currently, none of the sourcing goes in-depth, being simply mentions of the place. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

@Onel5969:, the "area" here refers to "location", as I have been watching the news of rafting at this location since 2021. So I belong to Jammu and Kashmir (union territory) and I work especially on Chenab Valley and articles related to it. So, I verified the location from my own sources too, which is actually a village in Doda district. So, there is legal recognition that this place is shown on the government website here. and its population is counted in the 2011 Indian Census, which can be obtained from here. So a place that is legally recognised and has an even lower population is notable under WP:NGEO.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:23, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thanks for adding information in Sargam Koushal article. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Thank you.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 07:29, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Sargam Koushal

I saw you editing this article in which you added incorrect information about her that she was born in 20 September but as of Moneycontrol.com and Jagran Josh, she was born in 17 September not in 20 September. You can see the references https://www.jagranjosh.com/general-knowledge/who-is-sargam-koushal-mrs-world-winner-2022-1671430002-1 https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/trends/sargam-koushal-navy-officers-wife-brings-mrs-india-crown-to-india-after-21-years-9730331.html

Thanks. Please ping me if you want to reply. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 17:32, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi @LordVoldemort728: , thanks for your message. Yes, I saw that many articles says 17 September as her birthdate. But I came across an article https://thechenabtimes.com/2022/12/19/jks-sargam-koushal-wins-mrs-world-2022-title-after-21-years/ . Where it says As per different media reports, her birthdate was different, while confirming her birthday to The Chenab Times, Sargam Koushal said that she was born on 20th September 1990 to GS Koushal and Meena Koushal in Jammu. She is married to Aditya Manohar Sharma who is an Indian Navy officer. and yesterday when I visited her instgram page, I saw that she shared the above link in her story. That's why I got confirmed that 20 September is correct.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️)

But the article from The Chenab Times is a press release and articles from Jagran Josh and Moneycontrol are not, they are written by individual author. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 08:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Press releases are often tagged on The Chenab Times as "Press Release" at the top because I have previously participated in various events where I observed this. The above one probably is not written by an individual author, but they claims to have interviewed Sargam Koushal for clarification of personal details. That seems more authentic. And Jangran Josh and Moneycontrol don't quote anyone for her date of birth claim; they write it generally.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 08:40, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Invitation

Hello TheChunky:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a two week long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 14 January 2023.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2800 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help! ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 13:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

And also, I've been using an improvised version of your signature since quite a while ;) ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 13:50, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. I would love to do that ;). ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 13:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Request on 00:23:19, 6 January 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Pugliese23

Pugliese23 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Roberto Córdova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am surprised that you declined my submission, Draft:Roberto Córdova. I had clearly established that Córdova was a judge of the International Court of Justice, the most important international court on Earth. He is one of the few judges of the ICJ without a Wikipedia article in English (see Judges of the International Court of Justice). The notability guidelines that you refer me to clearly establish that "politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels". Out of my commitment to improving international law coverage in Wikipedia, I have included additional references and expanded the article, and resubmitted it. To be sure, it needs improvement. But it is a necessary article as it stands.

Pugliese23 (talk) 00:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Pugliese23 Hello, The references you added there are mostly primary sources, and some of them have errors that need to be addressed. Most important, the subject might be notable, but references should be made as per policies. Kindly fix the references and submit again; if it follows the guidelines, it will be accepted soon. Please note that I have declined the submission, which means that after improvement, it can be submitted again. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:37, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. Is notability the issue? There are more than enough primary and secondary sources establishing that he was an ICJ judge. I understand notability should be presumed, as per the guidelines. I don’t think rejecting the submission was ever the adequate response to any shortcomings the article may have.

I am inclined to simply abandon the draft, as evident as it is that it is notable and necessary (i.e., one of the very few judges in the history of the ICJ without an article). Pugliese23 (talk) 10:19, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Done. Please improve the article by copyediting and also add infobox if you can. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 14:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Pugliese23 Can you please clarify to me that the mayor of Pichilemu City Council, whose name is also Roberto Córdova, is a different person!!! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 14:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! He is, indeed, a different person. Pugliese23 (talk) 14:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Ah! Then there are various links present where the judge Roberto is linked as Mayor. Please try to remove them. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️)

Request on 19:40:39, 6 January 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by VideŁitt

VideŁitt (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ulrike Lienbacher (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

VideŁitt (talk) 19:40, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

hello, you have recently rejected my proposal for an article. i have reworked the article. i#ve scrapped most of the text and added a boatload of sources and a 'further reading' section. could you maybe have a look again and check whether this would be ok now? best, best Vide https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ulrike_Lienbacher

VideŁitt Hi, the article still need reliable and independent coverage. Please read what is WP:RS. Add at three best sources which covers the subject in depth. Thank you.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️)

TheChunky thanks for having a look. aren't you setting the boundary unusually high for me here? especially for a living artist? basic noteability rules say "People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject." i have cited 7 renowned newspapers, in-depth-texts in photo journals, texts in 4 different catalogues in english language – all published completely independent of the artist. i listed numerous exhibitions in internationally know exhibition venues. all the people I've quoted (in the longer version too) are notable curators, art historians and journalists relevant to the field (if you want, google Silvia Eiblmayr, Thomas D. Trummer, Roger Malbert, Martin Hochleitner, Reinhard Braun...) i have also used a few quotes from longer in-depth texts that were published in lienbacher's books (they are not self-published though) to describe her approach. i think this is legitimate for contemporary artist. i hope you can reconsider your verdict. best, Vide

Dear, if you believe that article passes WP:GNG and WP:NBIO, you can resubmit it. There are thousands of reviewers who are currently reviewing drafts. It will be reviewed by some more experienced reviewer. For now, I suggest you to kindly expand the lead section a bit as per WP:LEAD. Thank You. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 14:24, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your sig

I don't know if you noticed, but your signature points to Talk:TheChunky and not user talk:TheChunky. Please fix it. Primefac (talk) 15:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know Primefac. I have fixed it now. Thanks again.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 16:53, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Question about page declined?

Hi TheChunky,

Thanks for reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Or_Hen! Unfortunately it was declined, and I'm unsure I understand why? The 8 criteria for science bio pages talk about "elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association" and give being an IEEE fellow as an example. The person I wrote about is an APS Fellow (which is the equivalent of IEEE for physics researchers). The APS website says "... no more than one half of one percent of the Society’s membership (excluding student members) is recognized by their peers for election to the status of Fellow of the American Physical Society", which speaks to its distinction. In addition, the person received several international prizes by APS and IUPAP. So I think there are two objective criteria that they meet (and also more subjective ones based on the impact of their work but I leave that out of the discussion for now).

What can I do to improve the submission for approval? 18.10.70.75 (talk) 20:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your efforts in contributing to Wikipedia. We understand that the subject of your draft article may be notable and may also pass WP:PROF, but unfortunately the "Early life and education" section had only one source at the beginning sentences and the whole section was unsourced. Additionally, the "Research and career" section also had many unsourced pieces of information. In order to have your draft accepted, it is important to include reliable sources for all of the information included in the article. We appreciate your understanding and look forward to seeing your improved draft in the future. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:33, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Another question about page declined

Hi TheChunky,

Thanks for reviewing my https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yves Winkin. But I'm confused: I do not understand why this does not meet the requirements of an encyclopedia article. I've actually published half a dozen articles in print encyclopedias (I'm a retired professor), and I've previously created a couple of Wikipedia entries as well, so I thought I understand the basic requirements. Can you provide more specific information about what you're finding inappropriate, or do you prefer that I use the real-time chat help? Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz — Preceding undated comment added 04:36, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for sharing your experience with creating Wikipedia entries, Sir Leeds-hurwitz. As a retired professor, it is important to be aware of any potential conflicts of interest when editing articles related to your field of expertise. Additionally, it is important to ensure that all Wikipedia articles follow the guidelines outlined in WP:NPOV and are structured in a neutral and encyclopedic manner, rather than appearing as an essay. Please keep these guidelines in mind when making future contributions to Wikipedia.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:51, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	Silver Wiki Award
	Thank you for participating in Articles for Creation's January 2023 Backlog Drive! You came in second place, with 481 reviews for a total of 593.5 points. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Request on 15:03:13, 12 January 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Armer Thor

Armer Thor (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Wilson fermion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

TheChunky Thank you for the quick review! I am surprised by the outcome though. After the article Draft:Wilson fermion had been declined for the first time, I have added more references so that there are now 4 published and reviewed books. In my understanding all of them meet all the required criteria being in-depth, reliable, secondary, and independent. I would be very thankful for more specific feedback as to how many more references would be required or whether the type of references provided should be changed. Armer Thor (talk) 15:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your hard work on creating the Draft:Wilson fermion article, Armer Thor. After reviewing the draft as you did some improvements, I believe that it would be better suited as a section within the "Lattice field theory" article rather than having a separate article. There are also other fermion-related drafts currently under review, so it's best to wait for feedback from other reviewers before making any final decisions. Keep in mind that there is a reviewing drive happening currently, so your draft will be reviewed soon. Thanks again for your contribution! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 18:36, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks TheChunky, that makes a lot of sense. I agree that some of the lattice fermion discretisations are not really notable enough to warrant their own page. This is certainly true for the Draft:Stacey fermion and possibly for the Draft:SLAC fermion. However, I'd argue that some other lattice fermions are important enough and have enough to say about that an article of their own feels more than reasonable. E.g. Staggered fermion has existed for a while and Domain wall fermion has recently been added. Draft:Wilson fermion is arguably even more important than the aforementioned, Draft:Ginsparg-Wilson fermion, Draft:Overlap fermion, and Draft:Twisted mass fermion are roughly similar in importance.

Most of these articles are stubs so far because I believe it better to have all the definitions out there than a few long articles, but expanding them is just a matter of time. Adding all of them into lattice field theory would simply be too much. Armer Thor (talk) 14:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Page declined - request for more guidelines

Hello @TheChunky, I've recently submitted a draft on the Polish MarTech company RTB House. I added more sources as you've advised but they are in different languages (not just English or Polish) - is that ok? I also delated some, that may have been considered not independent. Another thing - since the topic is a b2b company from a very specific line of business, most of the materials are from industry but also business media. I've also stumbled upon a couple of companies-related articles on Wiki which were citing their own websites or were giving no sources at all, so I hope that what I did is enough. I'd appreciate your feedback.

Additionally, I added a couple of new information on the company since these were the main reasons I believed it's worth publishing that article on wiki (the company grew from just a tech start-up into a large company and it managed to establish its presence in various countries in - which for a Polish company is a real success story; and most importantly it's involved in the Google's Privacy Sandbox project which goals and results are important for an average internet user). I tried to be as matter of fact as possible - hopefully, I managed to do just that. But if something sounds too vague or seems unsubstantiated, please let me know and I'll do my best to improve the draft. Msg 2507 (talk) 10:40, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@Msg 2507: Hi, currently the draft is violating WP:REFBOMB policy. Please read this and improve it. And secondly, did you have any connection with this subject? Just asking. If yes, you have to declare it. For that read WP:COI. After improvement, resubmit the draft, it will be reviewed soon.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 15:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

@TheChunky Hi, thank you for the quick reply. Starting from the end: yes I do have connection with the topic. I made notification on my user page - as it was asked of me during the Article creation process. I want to be fully transparent about it. As for the policy you sent me - thank you. I read it and hopefully made the appropriate corrections. I checked the sources once again, chose those that were talking more about the topic or were solely dedicated to it (e.g. independent profile pieces, interviews), were relevant and confirming the key facts (not anything random like: Warsaw is capital of Poland). TBH it's more difficult than I thought to create a properly documented article - even if one knows the subject. Thank you for your help! Msg 2507 (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the improvement but I think you need to read WP:BETTER especially WP:Encyclopedic style to make the article structure better in an encyclopaedic tone. Regarding conflict of interest, you can visit WP:Teahouse and ask them how to declare WP:COI and WP:PAID. They will let you know more clearly. After all improvements, resubmit the draft. Hope it will be reviewed soon. Thank you!. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 00:36, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi, You have got a email

Hello, TheChunky. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.@Divineplus

Divineplus (talk) 12:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Yayzy

Hi TheChunky,

Thank you for reviewing Draft:Yayzy earlier. I rewritten it almost completely and was wondering if you'd have the time to have another look at it? Any tips, contributions, help is greatly appreciated. Jerry3zs (talk) 12:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

@Jerry3zs: Hi, hope you are doing well. I still believe this article is written like an advertisement of a company. Wikipedia is not a place for advertisement. If you need help from more experienced users, please visit WP: Teahouse. Thank you.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 13:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

A cute goat for you!

Salam Al Kashmiri! Absolutely wonderful contributions you have made to Wikipedia. As a new editor, I would definitely look up to you and follow your steps.

NamkeenChai (talk) 13:28, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

@NamkeenChai: Walaikum Asalam! Thank you for the cute goat. Well, I am more focused on WikiProject Chenab Valley, which deals with the addition, editing, and improvement of articles related to Chenab Valley. I would love to invite you to contribute articles there. Also, there is a message on your talk page regarding your multiple accounts; please clarify there why you use this second account because this may violate some policies if multiple accounts are created without any reason. Thanks again.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 13:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, would love to contribute in whatever capacity I can.

Also, I'm getting used to the interface, will get back to the talk page in a while. NamkeenChai (talk) 14:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Page declined - Robert (Bob) Gartland

I would like some assistance with the references that you have questioned? I will keep adding more references but I’ve already referenced several website sites, news sites, and Wiki links. I would appreciate some support to ensure this page is accepted. I’m new ish to wiki. I tried to follow convention of other sites about living people which have been published .

Thanks GeelongManifesto (talk) 05:03, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

@GeelongManifesto: Your Draft:Robert (Bob) Gartland was declined because it don't have enough reliable citations to establish notability of that person. (See WP:NBIO). The article tone is not like an encyclopaedic tone. You must visit WP:YFA and WP:BETTER to learn how to write better articles. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Clear the drafts related to Chenab Valley

	Review
	Salam! I hope you are fine. I have added some drafts related to WikiProject Chenab Valley in to do list, where you are also a member or participant. Kindly review the articles and clear the log. Thank You. Moj '-(talk) 10:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Wilson fermion

Hi TheChunky. Concerning your declining of the Draft:Wilson fermion article (I didn't write it but I feel like I must advocate on its behalf); you seemed to decline it on the basis of its references/notability. However, the article clearly lists 3 secondary, reliable, and independent textbook references (they are the standard textbooks in lattice field theory) which each have a in-depth cover of the topic. Wilson fermions are THE lattice fermion discretization of the field along with staggered fermions. The original paper (by Wilson, cited in the article) has 2.8k citations, which in a physics context is insanely good. I also did research in lattice field theory for a year last year so I have a solid grasp of the area of physics to be able to say that Wilson fermions are fundamental to it. I agree that the article is stubby in how it's written, but this is a separate issue.

Either way it would be helpful to know what specifically the article is missing in the reference/notability context? OpenScience709 (talk) 10:42, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Hi! I hope you are doing well. If you are an expert in that field and you or the creator believe that this article establishes notability, any of you can resubmit it. I declined it earlier after observing general notability criteria which I think haven't met. And having "3 secondary sources" is not a notability criteria; it is just an essay (See WP:THREE). If the creator needs more help from experienced users, he or she can visit WP:Teahouse.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️)

Thanks for the speedy reply! My argument was more that the 3 sources are notable rather than that 3 sources exist, but either way thanks for the comment! I'll resubmit it. Best, OpenScience709 (talk) 12:02, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Page Extended Peer Community

Hi TheChunky I am puzzled by your second rejection of the page "Extended peer community" because of unclear context. I see that you have not commented on the talk page of the same voice, which is surprising - as I understand these are the pages where issues are discussed and controversies solved. Anyhow, thanks for suggesting improvements. I now discuss the context more and added a new See Also section with pointed to pages where this kind of subjects are discussed. Hope you will find this new version sufficiently clear. Andrea Saltelli Saltean (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Masrat Zahra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Yana_Kay

Hi Chunky! I am very surprised by your decision! The person I'm trying to write an Article about is part of Category - Eurovision, and for long time belongs to a fairly steady stream of musical life of Latvia. I am comparing already existing articles of persons from the same categories - Mārtiņš Freimanis, Ingus Baušķenieks and Markus Riva. And these Articles are more than poor in content and citation level. The content of this Articles includes material that real meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations, as opposed to the target article?? Of course, I saw Referencing for beginners and Citing sources and learn it (btw - from 2006 year in Wiki). Please consider about your opinion regarding these long-existing Articles. Arminius-fun-nick (talk) 23:09, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

@Arminius-fun-nick:, I hope you are doing well. First of all, as you said, you have been on Wikipedia since 2006, but your account shows you joined within the past year. If you are using multiple accounts, make it clear as per WP:MULTIPLE. Now, the second thing is your draft; if you have read WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS, you must know that YouTube, Apple Music, and all websites like them are not reliable and that it is discouraged to use these on a Wikipedia article. The notability of a person on Wikipedia depends upon secondary, reliable, and independent sources, which means the subject should not be connected with these sources. And none of the citations added in the draft look reliable; most of them are primary sources, which are from unreliable websites. And thanks for bringing the above three articles to my attention, of which I quickly observed that two don't meet the notability criteria. The relevant tags will be placed on them, and they can be draftfied.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:34, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments, and should I prove to you that I have been on Wikipedia since 2006? I consider it unethical to be proud of a personal list of articles written and the number of edits made, to give and accept virtual rewards for this, as is usually done here. You offended me very much right away with your suspicions, that I use multiple accounts. I really don't like empty discussions in Wiki background, and I wrote time by time all the time without creating an account, from different IPs. it's not against the Wiki rules, is it? Only recently I noticed that new articles create in en.wikipedia is impossible without an account. So I had to create this account one year ago. I will delete links to YouTube, Apple Music, etc (but I I can foresee that in 2-3 years it would be admitted as reliable source, why not?). Will it help the case with accept this draft and move to current article? Arminius-fun-nick (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

The required changes into Draft have been made, should I wait for your response to my arguments (above), or can I claim directly to arbitration? Arminius-fun-nick (talk) 22:31, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

I still don't believe that the draft is ready to be accepted. The citations are unreliable as per WP:RS. If you believe that your draft passes notability criteria, you can resubmit it again. Someone will review it soon. Thank you.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:33, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

To believe or not to believe is not a contribution to Wiki. Do not be lazy to check it, and then your contribution will be truly valuable. And you won't have to earn awards for the lot of drafts reviewed. If you sending me to resubmit this draft, you shift this little work onto the shoulders of another checker. It'snot fairplay. Arminius-fun-nick (talk) 21:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023

Hello, I'm Toddst1. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to 2023 Thathri land subsistence seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't make up sensationalist terms to describe an event. That is considered WP:OR. Toddst1 (talk) 08:06, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Toddst1 Thanks for the message. Well, I wrote it in a neutral tone, but I agree that some words might not be neutral. As I made this article recently and it is being updated continuously because it is an ongoing event, I think these mistakes can be fixed. Thanks for your suggestions. I will keep that in mind for the future. Thanks again.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 08:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Page Declined - Request for reconsideration.

Hello TheChunky,

Thank you for reviewing & for your feedback on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Braden_Allen_King. Although, I do not agree with the outcome. In the Wikipedia:Notability (people) page under Entertainers it says, “Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions”. This entertainer has had significant roles in 6 notable stage productions, 2 of those being Broadway productions, which is the pinnacle of the American musical theatre industry. I would think that 500+ stage performances in these notable productions would be considered “multiple”. This page is also backed by published & reliable Broadway sources, for instance: Playbill, BroadwayWorld, Broadway Podcast Network & IBDB. I don’t see how this entertainer wouldn’t be considered notable, based on the aforementioned requirements. If possible, I would like to request a different editor and a different set of eyes to review this. Someone with American musical theatre knowledge would be helpful and more suitable to review this page. If that is not an option, let me know what I can do to help this page become accepted. Theatreman90 (talk) 21:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

@Theatreman90 Hi,

I understand that you believe the person you submitted for a Wikipedia draft is notable, and in some cases, that may be true if certain criteria are met. However, notability also relies on the reliability and verification of the sources provided.

From the sources you provided, I noticed that many of them are primary sources or passing mentions, which are not considered reliable for determining notability. For example, the first source from the Internet Broadway Database is a primary source, and the second source from Playbill is not opening and showing a 403 Forbidden error. Additionally, the third source from BroadwayWorld is connected to the subject, which makes it unreliable for determining notability.

Furthermore, many of the other sources you provided, such as the official website of Braden Allen King and the Prom Music website, are also primary sources and cannot be considered for notability. Direct interviews, such as the one from the Broadway Podcast Network, are also not considered as independent sources for determining notability.

The 4th is "EastbayTimes" which again is a passing mention for the above subject. Then we come to the 5th source, which is "Lesher Art Center", which is a primary source for the award, can't be considered again. Now, if we observe the 7th source, which is "BroadwayWorld" again, so it's primary and can't be considered for notability. Now, the 7th source is "ActorsAccess", which is not reliable. Now, the 8th source is "BroadwayWorld" again which is not reliable for notability, The 9th source is "the official website of Braden", which is again a primary source and connected to the subject, which can't be considered for notability. Then we have the 10th source: "Broadway Podcast Network", which might be reliable, but direct interviews are not considered independent sources, so again, not considered for notability. Now, the 11th source is "BETM The Sky Kid", which is not reliable and primary and can't be considered for notability. Now the 12th source: Prom Music is again primary and cannot be considered for notability. Now, the 13th source: "Buffalo Rising" is a passing mention that can't be considered notable. Now, the 14th source: "New Jersey Stage" is again a passing mention and can't be considered for notability. Now, 15th source: "Variety" is a passing mention for this subject, which is again not considered noteworthy. Now, the 16th source is the official website of Braden, which is again not considered noteworthy. The 17th source is "App.com" is reliable and notable. The 18th source is "Plan B Entertainment" can be considered for notability. Now 19th source: "V Media Backstage" can be considered notable. Now, 20th source: "BroadwayWorld" is a primary and also passing mention, which can't be considered for notability. The 21st source is "Prom Musical", which is again primary and can't be considered for notability. Now the 22nd source: "Ticket Holders Award" is again primary and can't be considered for notability.

In order for a Wikipedia draft to be accepted, it is important to provide reliable and independent sources that verify the notability of the subject. I recommend researching and finding additional sources that meet these criteria before resubmitting your draft. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'll be happy to help.❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:02, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

@TheChunky Hi,

Thank you for getting back to me. I do agree with most of your feedback & added more secondary sources to the page. What I don’t agree with is your thought on IBDB being a primary source. It is the first site listed on ‘The Harvard Theatre Collection: A Guide for Researchers’ “Secondary Sources” page. Also, BroadwayWorld.com may be a primary source, but it does not have a direct connection to the subject of the wikipedia article. I’m sorry you are having trouble accessing the Playbill article. I have no issues with that site being pulled up on my end. BETM The Sky Kid is a fan website, making it a secondary source & has been considered a reliable source in other actors’ wikipedia pages. How many secondary source references do I need for this subject to qualify for a wikipedia page? Here are some of the secondary sources I have referenced: IBDB, Plan B Entertainment, V Media Backstage, APP., BETM The Sky Kid, TheatreStorm & TicketHoldersLA (Review). Let me know if there’s anything else I can do to further the progress of this wikipedia page. Thank you. Theatreman90 (talk) 01:04, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Please visit WP:Teahouse to get help regarding this from more experienced users. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:26, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

@TheChunky Hello,

I have taken your advice and added more secondary sources to this article and made a couple minor edits. If you have the time, I would appreciate if you could review the article again with these new changes. Thank you for all your help. Theatreman90 (talk) 07:13, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Baabarr Mudacer

Hello TheChunky,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Baabarr Mudacer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

M.Ashraf333 (talk) 05:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pradeep Narwal

Hello, TheChunky. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pradeep Narwal".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Request on 20:13:31, 10 March 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Sylvan1971

Sylvan1971 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Bruce Ryan (production designer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I disagree with the rationales for rejection. Depth: if you look at previous drafts, I cut this down after receiving rejections from other editors. Reliable: In previous drafts I did use sources deemed unreliable by wikipedia. These have all been replaced with reliable publication sources. Secondary: Please provide examples so I can address them. Independent: This is just plain wrong. I received no input from the subject of the article. He is a well-known television production designer with hundreds of credit. I know IMDBm despite being owned by Amazon, isn't considered reliable by wikipedia but check him out. Thank you for reconsidering.

Sylvan1971 (talk) 20:13, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

If you need any help or assistance visit WP: Teahouse. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 23:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions reminder

You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Kautilya3 (talk) 00:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

I think this is not the first time you are giving me this reminder; you have already done this in the past. Now, you don't have to add this to my talk page again and again. Thank you for your timely reminders, which made me aware of how to edit sensitive topics. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 01:09, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, reminders are given once a year. If you do not wish to be reminded, you can put a ds/aware template on top of your talk page. The link above describes how to do it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 17:32, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Maranao kolintang

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that I will be working on the Draft:Maranao kolintang, since the original editor hasn't touched it since your rejection. I have sufficient sources in my collection that I can get this article up to Wikipedia's standards. I will work on it this month, and then resubmit. If you would look at it then, I would appreciate it. Best wishes, Jacqke (talk) 06:44, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing wikipedia. I appreciate your dedication. You can work on it and submit it. There are number of reviewers on Wikipedia, someone will definitely review it. And if i get time, I will do it by myself. Thanks again. Best wishes. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 09:59, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Philipp Käßbohrer

Hello TheChunky, I addressed your recent concerns regarding the draft. Kind regards User1719 (talk) 12:08, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:UK-Pakistan_Judicial_Protocol_on_Children_Matters_(2003)

Hi User:TheChunky could you please review the above article? I'm sure other would get around to it eventually, but thought you might be interested. Happy to address any changes or feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.181.162.126 (talk) 08:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!

Hello TheChunky,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TheChunky. Thank you for your work on Sampat Prakash. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank You! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 09:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Revert

why did you revert edit at love bhagwa trap? 150.129.164.195 (talk) 08:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Regarding the notability of the Bhagwa Love Trap conspiracy theory Wikipedia article, the rationale behind its exclusion was not provided. The subject matter possesses inherent significance and its notability is substantiated by a multitude of dependable sources. Consequently, there exists no legitimate grounds for the application of "Speedy Deletion" in this case. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 08:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Talk page on main space

Hi there, kindly have a look on article Masroor Abbas Ansari a Kashmiri leader who became famous after his father’s death. Problem is when the name is searched on search engines then only talk page of article is visible... please have on article and fix that problem . Thanks DrMosaviSyed (talk) 02:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Kindly upload photos

Hi there, kindly upload these photos to articles. I am temporarily blocked from editing, that’s why I am unable to upload these photos to the article. Kindly download and upload this photo <ref>https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0aAVChhgZTXVzdHwyjg6hVY6wm9ETCmHKr1TNBMKbRCh5dWRm6qfQdM8GToofh1Lxl&id=100022032190618&mibextid=qC1gEaCite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page). upload to Syed Jawad Naqvi And this photo <ref>https://www.facebook.com/100069065417064/posts/pfbid0KP5Xjnu4fkDkXMxSZfHYDTrctUb73Sizo4qk3jL3GVX2GCoM6SHjCihQCMprEQC9l/?mibextid=cr9u03Cite error: The opening <ref> tag is malformed or has a bad name (see the help page). upload to Masroor Abbas Ansari ..... Thanks DrMosaviSyed (talk) 11:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

We can't upload these photos due to copyright issues. Don't worry, someone who owns the copyright will add photos there. You can improve the article as there are still requirements for copy editing. Thank you. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 11:51, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Then you can add any other photos of your own choice without any copyright to these articles.... DrMosaviSyed (talk) 13:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Would you consider becoming a New Page Reviewer?

Hi TheChunky, we need experienced volunteers.

New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision (if it looks daunting, don't worry, it basically boils down to checking CSD, notability, and title). If this looks like something that you can do, please consider joining us.
If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions. You can apply for the user-right HERE.
If you have questions, please feel free to drop a message on my talk page or at the reviewer's discussion board.
Cheers, and hope to see you around — ❯❯❯ Raydann ^(Talk) 21:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

@Raydann Thanks for this opportunity. I would love to join this project. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 04:26, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi TheChunky. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:

Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 01:57, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Masroor Abbas Ansari, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashmiri.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Ramban district

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Ramban district indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

These categories are Wikipedia categories of WikiProject Chenab Valley. A maintenance category should not be deleted. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia requested maps in Chenab Valley

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested maps in Chenab Valley indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

@Liz These categories are Wikipedia categories of WikiProject Chenab Valley. A maintenance category should not be deleted. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Chenab Valley

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Chenab Valley indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

@Liz These categories are Wikipedia categories of WikiProject Chenab Valley. A maintenance category should not be deleted. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Kishtwar

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Kishtwar indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

These categories are Wikipedia categories of WikiProject Chenab Valley. A maintenance category should not be deleted. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Doda district

A tag has been placed on Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Doda district indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

These categories are Wikipedia categories of WikiProject Chenab Valley. A maintenance category should not be deleted. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Deepak Kalal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepak Kalal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Kalal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 15:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

New page patrolling

Hello. Can you please explain why you added "context" and "no footnotes" tags to Chernor Bah in this edit? Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 15:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the message. When I added these tags, the article was a single sentence with only one bare URL as a reference. That's why I added these tags. Then, I restored the "more citations" tag to suggest expanding the article with reliable sources. That's it. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

The "one source" tag was correct.

The "BLP sources" tag was also correct.

But why the "context and "no footnotes" tags? Wikishovel (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

The context tag was added because one sentence was not enough to explain the article. "No footnotes" was added because there was only a single general reference. To include more inline citations, I added that tag as a suggestion. When you removed those tags, I understood that I may have gone somewhere wrong. But I still believed that at least this article needs a "more citations" tag, so I restored it. Well, I can't claim my observation is superior; it may be wrong. You can give suggestions so that I can improve further. Thanks. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 19:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

I'd be grateful if you read Template:No footnotes, which explains its criteria for use, and WP:OVERTAGGING. Thanks, Wikishovel (talk) 19:11, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Well, I have already read these. But will follow strictly in future. Thanks for advice. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 19:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Hello, would be able to help review a page that has been taking too long to review?

Asalamu Alaikum/Hey @TheChunky i had created a page Lewis Raymond Taylor recently about two weeks ago, but it has been taking too long to get reviewed despite the page reviewers improving it, it is still pending the review. it will be very appreciated thank you. Tintantuckle (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Walaikum Assalam, @Tintantuckle. The article needs some improvements; I have added some tags (also see WP:REFBOMB). And 9-10 days is not too long a period. There are thousands of articles pending for review in the NPP backlog. All reviewers are trying their best to reduce this backlog. Kindly improve the article; it will be reviewed anytime. No worries. Thank you. Regards. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 15:40, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. Tintantuckle (talk) 15:41, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, TheChunky. Thank you for your work on Digdole. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:03, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

@SunDawn: Thank you. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 01:04, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your work on Chenab Valley articles. - iMahesh (talk) 02:09, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. ❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 02:10, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, TheChunky/Archive 2. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by RotciW (TᴳRᴴAᴼIˢNᵀ)-(Cₛ) 03:11, 21 September 2023 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

[1] t including another ~6,000 redirects

[2] The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

[a]

[b]