User talk:TheFix63

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked[edit]

I have blocked you for violating the edit war guidelines with your IP address, if violation of WP:SOCK. If you violate this again, you will be blocked for a longer period of time. To request an unblock, please add {{unblock|Your reason here}} to your user talk page. Thanks, NW (Talk) 01:08, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

My apologies; per comment below. NW (Talk) 01:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: NW (Talk) 01:32, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

User Did Not Violate 3RR[edit]

Okay, as far as I can see, TheFix63 openly acknowledges that they are 24.13.213.117, but I see no place that indicates that this user has violated 3RR. The only article on which the user has made edits with both the IP address and the username was Same-sex marriage, where the three edits in question took place over the course of three days, thus not violating 3RR. Also, after having the edits reverted by Daedalus969, the user went to the talk page, left a comment, and appears to be waiting for consensus before making any further changes. On the 28th, only the user's first edit was with the IP address; ALL later edits were with the username, suggesting to me that the user edited the page, then realized that they were not logged in, and subsequently logged in and stayed logged in for the remainder of the day. This does not seem like sockpuppetry to me! The same thing happens to me when I forget to log in. Does that make me a sockpuppet too? TheFix63 is 24.13.213.117, but they do not appear to be acting as a sockpuppet, as best as I can discern. Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 01:26, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. –túrianpatois 05:01, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Same-sex marriage introduction[edit]

I have proposed changes. Would like your input. Thanks76.102.68.34 (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalism article[edit]

Uh oh. You edited the Capitalism article, and you didn't even mention Marx! Better watch out before they come and revert your edit to maintain their beloved neutral point of view. Macai (talk) 22:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As an addendum, don't even bother with the controversial articles, my friend. Wikipedia is way off in lefty land. Just look at the capitalism and communism articles. You may as well be reading Conservapedia's article on evolution. Macai (talk) 22:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I made a comment about your edit to Capitalism on the talk page. Your edit is not supported by the source provided. The Four Deuces (talk) 23:58, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to War on Terrorism. Some may see your edit as pushing a particular POV, therefore, it may assist other active editors in determining the reasoning for your edits, thus reducing the chances of your edit being reverted. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 17:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]