User talk:The Muss

Welcome!

Hello, The Muss, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ameliorate!&amp;amp;nbsp;(talk&amp;amp;nbsp;&amp;Acirc;&amp;middot; contribs) 15:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drop bear[edit]

I have just deleted the two unlicenced faked 'drop bear' images (we've seen them before) that you are using to 'illustrate' the article with. Please desist from this sort of misinformation, continuing such editing is likely to be viewed as vandalism (as the deliberate insertion of false information is, quite rightly, so designated). Thanks.--Alf ^melmac 14:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop. Consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. --Alf ^melmac 14:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Working on recreating “Race and crime”.[edit]

I’m posting this comment on the discussion pages of several users who were involved in the article Race and crime before it was merged into Anthropological criminology, to let all of you know that I’m working on recreating the Race and crime article. My current draft for it can be found here. I would appreciate help from any of you with two things related to this:

1: RegentsPark, the admin who protected the redirect from Race and crime to Anthropological criminology, has suggested that the statistical information in this article should be better-integrated into the portion of it that discusses how these statistics can be interpreted. I would appreciate help with improving this aspect of the article, or any other aspects of it that you think could be improved.

2: RegentsPark has let me know here that he won’t be willing to unprotect the article himself, no matter how much it’s improved, so if I would like it to be unprotected I should propose this at WP:RFPP. I’ve proposed there that it be unprotected, but the admin who responded (User:Camaron) stated that without RegentsPark’s approval, I would need to first obtain a consensus that the article should be recreated. If you think the article does not require any additional improvements, and is good enough to be recreated in its current state, I would appreciate you making your opinion about this known on the draft’s discussion page, so that we can begin to create a consensus for this.

Thanks in advance. --Captain Occam (talk) 07:47, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]