User talk:Thechixwithdix

Speedy deletion of Bradly McLean

A tag has been placed on Bradly McLean requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KevinCuddeback (talk) 02:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Little context in Jacob Roby

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Jacob Roby, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Jacob Roby is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Jacob Roby, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of The chix with dix

A tag has been placed on The chix with dix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CiTrusD ^{Talk here!} 00:12, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. The chix with dix was deleted because it didn't meet the standards for Wikipedia articles, as you suggested -- the specific standards are listed at WP:MUSIC#Criteria for musicians and ensembles. Essentially (the policy will give you the complete details) when you have done your first cross-country tour, or released two albums with an arm's-length record company, or charted a single on any chart, or been the topic of more than a single newspaper or magazine article, then someone will probably write the article for you. Accounting4Taste:talk 02:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Also, check out our conflict of interest policy that suggests that you shouldn't write an article about yourself, and you may find WP:Your first article and WP:Why was my article deleted? to be useful. Accounting4Taste:talk 02:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

As per your request on my talk page, I've moved the deleted material onto a page called User:Thechixwithdix/Sandbox so that you can print it out. I'm going to trust you not to remount this, because I'm sure it will be deleted again, and you'll just be wasting someone's time. I can appreciate that you wanted to amuse your friends by giving them a Wikipedia article, but this is an encyclopedia, and we're fairly serious about what we do here. Try MySpace or Facebook, which don't have as many rules about content. (And, yes, this is pretty much what I have volunteered to do, as I think you were asking.) If you have any further questions about Wikipedia policy, you can leave me a note at the bottom of my talk page. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to User:KevinCuddeback has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Senator Palpatine 02:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)