User talk:Thekingofjuice3

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Thekingofjuice3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Maureen Dowd[edit]

Please use the talk page to discuss your edits to Maureen Dowd. You apparently restored an older revision/version of the article, including edits that have been extensively discussed on the talk page and unreferenced/poorly sourced edits that have been previously removed or do not belong in the article due to BLP concerns. Viriditas (talk) 05:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Upon closer inspection, it appears that you restored an old version from approximately one year ago, namely from 25 January 2009.[1] It also appears that you reverted to a version edited by an account named User:Down Home In Suntlay, which has only been used to edit this article. I would ask at this time that you refrain from reverting to old versions from one year ago and that you use the talk page to discuss your proposed edits in the future. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 05:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion _(talk) 12:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked you because you are abusing multiple accounts to carry on a year-old edit war for which you were then using a single-purpose account. Acroterion _(talk) 12:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thekingofjuice3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It's not fair!

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. NW (Talk) 03:24, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.