User talk:Tillman/Archive 2

Pictures

Thanks for uploading so many pictures, but based on the postings above, it looks like you're not fully aware of the restrictions. Ijust saw the Ansel Adams portrait you uploaded, which has a restiction against commercial use. All material on Wikipedia must be freely available for all users, including commercial ones. If you could be more discriminating in the future you'd save everyone the time of dealing with inelibile images. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 01:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

I certainly empathize with your frustration. Numerous editors have butted heads over this policy. Nonetheless, it is a foundational issue for Wikipedia and it's not likely to change. Old photographs (pre-1928), photos with generous licenses (sometimes found on Flicker), and photos we take ourselves appear to be the best sources. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 05:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Tillman, regarding your uploads of images under a "non-commercial" license, WP:CSD#I3 doesn't prohibit them as long as they have a valid fair-use rationale and that they meet the 10 criteria in WP:NFCC. Non-commercial licensed images are only speedily deleted if they don't have a valid fair-use rationale. But since your uploads had a rationale, I've removed the speedy deletion tags. Spellcast (talk) 20:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks -- I thought they were the REGULAR CC 3.0 license, not the non-commercial. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Samoan_American_drummer.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Samoan_American_drummer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mangostar (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DatsolaleeBaskets.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:DatsolaleeBaskets.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:37, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Tag removed -- bot error. See image talk page, Pete Tillman (talk) 16:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Theodore Roosevelt Lake edit

Thanks for your edit to the Roosevelt Lake article. I'm pretty sure "Lake Roosevelt" is an alternate (though less common) name for the lake, so I re-added it to the lede ("sometimes Lake Roosevelt" to emphasize that "Roosevelt Lake" is more common; I also left your other edits intact). I've explained further on the talk page. Just wanted to let you know! • WarpFlyght (talk • contribs) 23:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:MaryMurphy2.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Tillman!
We thank you for uploading Image:MaryMurphy2.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 00:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Oops! Fixed, sorry -- Pete Tillman (talk) 01:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:A. Kellerman 1920-2.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:A. Kellerman 1920-2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:A. Kellerman 1920-2.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. LegoK^ontribsT^alkM 04:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Santa Fe Southern Railway

Thanks for your edits to Santa Fe Southern Railway. I modeled the page after the Cumbres and Toltec page; is that also a short line railroad? --Una Smith (talk) 20:38, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:Maps of Arizona

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Maps of Arizona, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Maps of Arizona has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Maps of Arizona, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:30, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Betsy1901.gif

This image isn't showing up properly in the article because it's a .gif. If you can re-save it as a .jpg or something, that should make it show up right in the article. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 22:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:SentinelRock.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:SentinelRock.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:20, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

It has been resolved. What my question was, was when was it published, which is what establishes its PD status. --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 17:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:BikeBoys.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:BikeBoys.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -SCEhardT 22:36, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi - I'm sorry but I don't see where it says it was published by the company; I don't think that the copyright countdown starts until it is published. Lets discuss at WP:PUI so that other people can weigh in? -SCEhardT 02:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

See discussion at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_images/2008_July_9#Image:BikeBoys.jpg for resolution. Nutshell: relicensed as fair use, but it probably is PD. Pete Tillman (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Going Back to Bisbee.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Going Back to Bisbee.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:09, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Richard Shelton and Book Cover Image

Per WP:NONFREE, book cover images should NOT be used in an author article, only in an article about the book. As such, the image does not belong in Richard Shelton (writer), hence its removal. Also, your recent edit not only put the image back and removed a valid tag, but it removed all of the article categories and the stub tags. Please be more careful in the future. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Hansen (again again)

The user who inserted this quote is with very high likelihood a sockpuppet of User:scibaby, one of the most prolific and insistent socks in Wikipedias history. I suggest that you go onto the talk-page and get a consensus for the addition there - instead of using a sockpuppet edit as the platform.

As you well know, the previous consensus was to remove quotes. That consensus can of course be overturned, since consensus isn't a fixed position. But change consensus first - then change. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 16:48, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:SLC bus,1909.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:SLC bus,1909.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:SLC bus,1909.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 02:39, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:PackardBus.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:PackardBus.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:PackardBus.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 03:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

To answer your question

Current count is 69 on English Wikipedia, 20 on Commons. :) Best wishes. Durova^Charge! 02:17, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations! Cheers -- Pete Tillman (talk) 02:19, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Tule Desert (Arizona)

Geographical features are inherently notable. I wasn't sure if you were aware of this or not. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 12:54, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:AMTDZoot.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AMTDZoot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 13:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BikeBoys.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BikeBoys.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:36, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

New FUR posted at Image:BikeBoys.jpg. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 23:26, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Airliner_on_Sepulveda?.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Airliner_on_Sepulveda?.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SanJuanPotters.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SanJuanPotters.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Resolved, see Image:SanJuanPotters.jpeg --Pete Tillman (talk) 03:19, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:1533014756 ddb79a1ee2 o.jpg

Image:1533014756 ddb79a1ee2 o.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Russell Gulch school.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Russell Gulch school.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:36, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Bear dinner 1922.jpg .jpg is now available as Commons:Image:Bear dinner 1922.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

American Institute of Physics pictures

Hi there. I was recently reviewing some images, and I came across several pictures you uploaded from the American Institute of Physics photo archives. Some are public domain (or probably public domain) in the US, due to publication before 1923 (though we really need to be able to show that a picture was published before 1923, not just taken before 1923). The latter applies to Image:Ramsay william h1.jpg and Image:Leavitt henrietta b1.jpg (it's this one I'm not quite sure about). But there were three that are still in copyright and being sold by AIP (you can see this on their website where they charge people for using the photos): Image:Rubin vera f1.jpg, Image:Bethe hans.jpg, and Image:Bohr heisen pauli.jpg. This will probably mean that the images will have do be deleted because Wikipedia's non-free content policy has a criteria (#2) that means we need to avoid infringing against commercial use of the photos. The only exceptions are usually cases where the pictures themselves are "iconic" and discussed in an article as pictures (ie. the article discusses the picture, not the person in the picture). Also, in two of these cases, other photos exist (Hans Bethe and Wolfgang Pauli). Not sure about Vera Rubin, but that will probably have to go as well. It is OK to add links to the article so people can still click through to the photos, but we can't use them under our non-free content policy. If you have any objections or questions, please ask. Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 12:21, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your polite note re these photos. I'm begining to regret entering the treacherous fields of fair use. On to specifics. The Ramsay photo was almost certainly published during his lifetime; since he died in 1916, it's PD. The Leavitt photo was also likely published during her lifetime, but there's no documentation one way or the other. My feeling is, it's very likely PD, but you may feel differently. I agree it's a gray area. But, where there's no substitute, I think it's worth pushing the envelope a bit for the extra EV of supplying an image of a historic person.

For the Bethe and the group photo, it might be best to downgrade them to a link, as they're sort-of replaceable, and I don't have the energy to write a new FUR (which might not work anyway).

The Rubin I'll argue is worth keeping, and as time permits I'll rewrite the FUR to support this. The AIP doesn't really sell the photos: "the Emilio Segrè Visual Archives DOES NOT CLAIM COPYRIGHT to these images". They charge "a service fee, not a license in the legal sense." [1]. In any case, these 40 kb "big thumbnails" wouldn't compete with the full-size scans they offer.

Thanks for your interest, and I don't think I'll be posting many more fair-use images. Life is too short. Best regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 03:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:SanJuanPotters.jpeg

Thank you for uploading Image:SanJuanPotters.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

New FUR posted; see Image:SanJuanPotters.jpeg. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 03:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Arizona links

• The smalltownpapers.com links (ie http://www.smalltownpapers.com/listCPV.htm) look really spammy to me. They are poorly executed, 1.5 months outdated, and only show one edition of the paper.

• The Clarkdale's history link is redundant, as the link before it (which I left there) is to the same page.

• The links at Cornville, Arizona are really iffy. The first one is OK (though not the best source), the verdevalleyguide looks like straight spam and I have removed it again. The others really need to be attached to stubs of their subjects or used as sources, as there's no context as to why they are links at that page.

Up to you really, I was just following a different spammer around the Arizona pages. NJGW (talk) 05:46, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

Hiking article getting killed

Tillman:

Dunno, but it seems remotely possible judging from some of your Wikipedia activity that you might be interested in trying to save an article of potential interest to hikers in North America and elsewhere.

Wilderness Diarrhea is getting merged into Travelers Diarrhea by a couple of zealots who seem to have no concept of outdoor interests and a narrow, clinical orientation toward medicine.

I get around a lot in the outdoors and rarely treat water, but WD article had some good stuff.

After a couple of weeks of calm discussion, I went ballistic and no longer want to participate. Rational voices might help.

These guys have irrationally convinced themselves that WD isn't a legitimate topic for a Wikipedia article.

I've pointed out several bomb-proof arguements to no avail. I'd say the strongest is the rather vast number of published articles that discuss WD as a separate concern from TD. They are both environmental health topics, and obviously the context of each are far different.

Calamitybrook (talk) 17:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Barack Obama article probation

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Article, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Barack Obama/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- Grsz^X 00:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Extinct settlements

Please have a look at this proposal for a new project (ExtinctSettlments) and add your votes and/or views. I am canvassing as many interested people as I can and your name was on a relevant project list. Folks at 137 (talk) 18:27, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

William Timmons

Hi - I actually am pursuing dispute resolution on that page. The problem is that the process is being undermined by confirmed sockpuppets. My last revert was to revert a sockpuppet. Your last edit summary when you reverted along with the sockpuppets was a flat out lie -- the claim is anything but "unsubstantiated" and you know it. Please do not subvert the dispute resolution process with blatant mischaracterizations like that. Thank you. csloat (talk) 01:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Muggins Mountains Wilderness flora

I know how diligent you have been in Wikipedia. But, i didn't look at your page enuff to know if you are a Geology expert, either schooled or not. I went throught Engineering back when Arizona was still a Copper mining state, (as it still is). Thanx for your comments; before I read your remarks to me, I added a section on the Talk:Muggins Mountains, about Dome Valley, and the Psorothamnus spinosus. As soon as it cools, I want to get back out in some old and new mountain areas. (there are a whole bunch of areas to do, or to re-do.)(FromHot SonoranDesertYuma)---.....Mmcannis (talk) 03:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

== re: Talk:Bill Ayers

thanks that you source for your constructive scriticism re: my acitons on bill ayers. i only eintedned to help keep things cool and nonpolitical in a contoroversial article lathough looking back it is clear to me that i have failed to do so effectively. thank youf rfalling calling my attention to it and i will try to remedy this by withdrawing from this article to avoid causing many more problems. your concern is much appreciated I thank you for your help and patience. Smith Jones (talk) 00:15, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Los Angeles County

If you don't mind, would you mind identifying which of the arguments opposed to the proposed move you find to be sound? Perhaps I'm missing something, but I simply do not understand why this name is disambiguated in the article title in the first place, or why anyone would want to leave it that way. Thanks. --Born2cycle (talk) 03:02, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:XRFgoniometer.jpg

File:XRFgoniometer.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:XRFgoniometer manual.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:XRFgoniometer manual.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:04, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:ACHtunnel,1949.jpg is now available as Commons:File:ACHtunnel,1949.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Artesia 1948.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Artesia 1948.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Ave26Bridge,1925.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Ave26Bridge,1925.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Avila Adobe,1956.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Avila Adobe,1956.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:17, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Beverly Hills Hotel, 1925.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Beverly Hills Hotel, 1925.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Balboa Newport 1924.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Balboa Newport 1924.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Beverly Wilshire Hotel, 1959.png is now available as Commons:File:Beverly Wilshire Hotel, 1959.png. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:43, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Blessed Sac.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Blessed Sac.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:BlytheCA.jpg is now available as Commons:File:BlytheCA.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Bradbury Fire,1947.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Bradbury Fire,1947.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:BonzoIQ.jpg is now available as Commons:File:BonzoIQ.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:CA-DOMV,1940.jpg is now available as Commons:File:CA-DOMV,1940.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Cabrillo1947.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Cabrillo1947.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:47, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:CalifNG,1924adj.jpg is now available as Commons:File:CalifNG,1924adj.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Campo de Cahuenga.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Campo de Cahuenga.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Caoalinga"T's".jpg is now available as Commons:File:Caoalinga"T's".jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Cathay Circle Theater.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Cathay Circle Theater.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Casting Cats.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Casting Cats.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Catwater Village.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Catwater Village.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:09, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:ChinAmerKids,1936.jpg is now available as Commons:File:ChinAmerKids,1936.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Cedars of Lebanon Hospital.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Cedars of Lebanon Hospital.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:10, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:CircusElephantsLA.jpg is now available as Commons:File:CircusElephantsLA.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:CoaingaGusher.jpg is now available as Commons:File:CoaingaGusher.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:20, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:ComptonPunks,1954.jpg is now available as Commons:File:ComptonPunks,1954.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:21, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Cosmetic Class,1950.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Cosmetic Class,1950.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Cosmetology1946.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Cosmetology1946.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Culver City,1920.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Culver City,1920.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

File:DragonCostume,1953.jpg is now available as Commons:File:DragonCostume,1953.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:DumontDunes.jpg is now available as Commons:File:DumontDunes.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:30, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Electric face mask.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Electric face mask.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Elysian Waterfall.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Elysian Waterfall.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:14, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:EricNord.jpg is now available as Commons:File:EricNord.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Fingerprinting 1928.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Fingerprinting 1928.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:FiredomeV8,1952.jpg is now available as Commons:File:FiredomeV8,1952.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:FletcherBowron.jpg is now available as Commons:File:FletcherBowron.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:22, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:FlowerSt1946.jpg is now available as Commons:File:FlowerSt1946.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Freedom Train, LA '48.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Freedom Train, LA '48.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:FtonAztec.jpg is now available as Commons:File:FtonAztec.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:FtonMontezuma.jpg is now available as Commons:File:FtonMontezuma.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Glendale-Hyperion bridge.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Glendale-Hyperion bridge.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Harvesting carrots.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Harvesting carrots.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:56, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Hermosa Beach wrning.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hermosa Beach wrning.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Hitchhikers, 1939.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hitchhikers, 1939.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Jack Benny rehearsal.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Jack Benny rehearsal.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:07, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Jane Wyman,1935.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Jane Wyman,1935.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:08, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:KHJ-AM,1927.jpg is now available as Commons:File:KHJ-AM,1927.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:LA Xmas,1928.jpg is now available as Commons:File:LA Xmas,1928.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:LACMNH, 1956.jpg is now available as Commons:File:LACMNH, 1956.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:LAPL, 1935.jpg is now available as Commons:File:LAPL, 1935.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Leviathan-3.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Leviathan-3.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 13:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Mail sorting,1951.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Mail sorting,1951.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:MalibuAir.jpg is now available as Commons:File:MalibuAir.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:56, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:MissBeatnik.jpg is now available as Commons:File:MissBeatnik.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Mohawk 1951.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Mohawk 1951.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:59, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:MoonParadeLA.jpg is now available as Commons:File:MoonParadeLA.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:MoonFestLA.jpg is now available as Commons:File:MoonFestLA.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Mt.SanAntonio.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Mt.SanAntonio.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:New Alm smelter.jpg is now available as Commons:File:New Alm smelter.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:NiseiMon1959.jpg is now available as Commons:File:NiseiMon1959.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:OakhurstLogTrain.jpg is now available as Commons:File:OakhurstLogTrain.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Oil Fire, 1928.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Oil Fire, 1928.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Old Plaza, 1930.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Old Plaza, 1930.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:12, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Leon Duray.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Leon Duray.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:LittleBrownChurch.jpg is now available as Commons:File:LittleBrownChurch.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Pershing Square, 1941.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Pershing Square, 1941.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:PurismaConvento.jpg is now available as Commons:File:PurismaConvento.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Ramona Pageant.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Ramona Pageant.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:29, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Refinery fire, 1951.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Refinery fire, 1951.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:RicshaRide25c..jpg is now available as Commons:File:RicshaRide25c..jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:39, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Santa Fe Springs fire.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Santa Fe Springs fire.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

File:LasDamasPanamericanas.jpg is now available as Commons:File:LasDamasPanamericanas.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

File:SDARR Shovel.jpg is now available as Commons:File:SDARR Shovel.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Hollenbeck Park.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Hollenbeck Park.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

File:20-mule-team wagons.jpg is now available as Commons:File:20-mule-team wagons.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:33, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File:CadizSalt.jpg is now available as Commons:File:CadizSalt.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File:ColoStBridge,1920.jpg is now available as Commons:File:ColoStBridge,1920.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 22:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File:StaYnez.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Cave in Lizards Mouth Santa Ynez CA.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 07:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

File:S.GabrielHaze.jpg is now available as Commons:File:S.GabrielHaze.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Mos morgan h.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Morgan, W. Jason.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

File:AmesHydro,CO.jpg is now available as Commons:File:AmesHydro,CO.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:48, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Lord Mayor, 1881.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Lord Mayor, 1881.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Trampas43.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Trampas43.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Main Altar, SJDG.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Main Altar, SJDG.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 18:47, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Picuris mission.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Picuris mission.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

I have not forgotten

about this. I still have much to complete on the ArbCom case but I needed a break and have been attending to some other matters for a bit.

Looking over the page you pointed to it seems that it may have achieved some amount of a lull, or not? I can see some problems like Monbiot is given too much space and in multiple places. Every other thing is labeled as being "conservative" which is rather silly. The lead summarizes the points of the critics but there is no balancing summary of the supporters. Etc.

If things are precariously stable right now I don't want to come in like a bull in a china shop and upset the whole thing. So I am asking you if you think I should dive in or let the dust settle for a while before attempting some corrective edits? Your thoughts? --GoRight (talk) 19:48, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

The page does seems to have reached a lull -- on my part, because of fatigue.

You've identified some of the weak points. The biggie (in my view) is that the Other Side has painted the author as a fool and a buffoon. Which clearly isn't the case, though he does have a confrontational style, and was (app.) careless in parts of the book. I'm not quite sure how to fix it. As you probably saw on Talk, he has some respectable supporters, but their remarks are only available on blogs, not (so far) RS's. I'm not very hopeful we'll get consensus to use Stockwell. I'm hoping some of this will be picked up in the press, and hence be usable as RS'd.

So use your judgment. Maybe start with the Monbiot duplicate? Alex's rv of some of the silly political labels has stood so far, which is hopeful. Pull some more?

Good luck on the ArbCom thing. Yuk. Kind regards, Pete Tillman (talk) 21:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, I'll take a close look. Thanks. --GoRight (talk) 22:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Non-free images in lists

Thanks for supplying the policy page link; I wasn't previously aware of it. I'll stop removing those pictures, now that I know that they're permitted. Nyttend (talk) 11:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

No problem --Pete Tillman (talk) 16:33, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks (images)

Thanks for the kind words re image uploads -- glad you like them. Did you see File:Phallic-Head Plate, 1536 .jpg?

If you are so inclined, have a look at [2]]. Support welcome -- I don't know what his problem is.... Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 15:37, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

I assume his problem relates to Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria - read Wikipedia:Non-free content where it is placed in context. The image is a "non-free" one, so there has to be a good reason for using it. J Milburn appears to be challenging the image under the "significance" criteria. He offers a clue as to how to use the image - build a section in the article on Hayden's relationship with Fonda. Currently the relationship is mentioned only in passing, and so the significance of the image is not clear. SilkTork *^YES! 17:27, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Out of my depth, pointers?

Hi. I'm an admin who volunteers at the copyright problems board. We've had two articles now on the desert Wahiba Sands, both of which were extensive copyright violations. Since it is obviously a notable feature, I've written a new infringement-free article, but my area is humanities. I'm hoping to find somebody who can review the article with an eye to seeing if I've completely muffed something (all my sources online) due to my lack of familiarity. I've selected you to ask because of your contributions to the template on deserts, which suggest that you might be able to help. :) If you don't have time or inclination, please let me know; I'll try to find somebody else. I'll be watching your page in case you have opportunity to reply. Thank you for any assistance or advice you may be able to offer. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:45, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Well, I knew absolutely nothing about the Wahiba Sands before, and now know a little, so I'd say you did a good job. No obvious flubs in two readings -- though the "Geography" section might better be called "Geology"? HTH, and thanks for going above & beyond the call of duty. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 22:22, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your feedback. :) I'll modify the section header accordingly. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:58, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Avlaon Harbor.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Avlaon Harbor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Optigan13 (talk) 06:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

If you're going to keep this image, would you please reverse it. It appears that it has been scanned in as a mirror image since the Casino would not be on that side of the bay. Thank you!--38.98.36.18 (talk) 19:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Do you know how to do that? I don't. Thanks, Pete Tillman (talk) 19:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

There are two ways that you can tell that the image is reversed. First, the bay is oriented the wrong way. If you are looking at the Casino from the opposite side of the bay, the ocean should be on the right side of the photo. Secondly, if you look at the original slide from the url above, you can see that the text is reversed. I went ahead and changed it already, though someone with better photo editing skills might be able to do a better job than I did.--mcd51 (talk) 04:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! It is a nice photo -- I appreciate the help, as I am more or less clueless re digital photo editing. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 04:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

File:DVScotty.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:DVScotty.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Optigan13 (talk) 23:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Museum cats

it's not. in fact, I'm just undoing a misguided effort I made back in June. I've been going methodically through the states, cleaning them up one by one. As I'm sure you noticed, I just reached New Mexico, but check out any of the other states. Each museum gets at least one "type" category at the state level and only one "location" cat at either the city or county level (depending on if there are enough for a city). There was a lot of feedback against creating categories with one or two pages. So you'll occasionally see a museum tagged as "history museums in State" and "Numismatic museums in the United States" for example. Check out Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Museums for more discussion about this. Thanks dm (talk) 05:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:HPW8airliner.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:HPW8airliner.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nigel Ish (talk) 19:32, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

A number of images of W8 appear in the Flight Magazine some published before 1928, for example http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/leftnavigation.aspx?path=1922/1922%20-%200732.PDF&pageno=37 might be worth a look either to scan or validate that images were published at an early date. MilborneOne (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Shiprock

Hi Tillman,

I have been editing parts of the Shiprock article but think it needs more input from people better informed than I am. Should the article should be included in indigenous peoples of the americas? It misses any reference to pre-Navajo beliefs or Anasazi role. It could be barking up the wrong tree, but I am convinced there would be grounds for an unrecorded climb. You look like the correct person to point me to the correct person! That would be much appreciated. It looks like you have an awful lot on your wikiplate. Nice articles! And you did camp bird mine, too!? Diastar (talk) 22:22, 27 July 2008 (UTC)diastar

Thanks! I see you are way too occupied with way too much! But if you come across any experts that would be interested, please point them to Shiprock. And, it was me that dashed the dreams of rock climbers by finally finding a source that clearly states it is illegal. Still, I am convinced that that Anasazi could'uv if they wanted. BTY: there is an nice little book on the Bachelor Mine - so I will add an article soon enough. best. Diastar (talk) 01:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)diastar

Possibly unfree File:Oldgold,2000bc.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oldgold,2000bc.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Durova^Charge! 02:37, 8 May 2009 (UTC)