User talk:Tlayden

Welcome!

Since you say you edited anonymously in the past, I figured that it was a bit silly to leave you a standard welcome. But I did want to welcome you aboard. I'm glad that you decided to register an account. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:56, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Alan Kulwicki

Have you given the article a Good article review? Zenlax ^{T C S} 19:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, Tlayden. We've not 'met', but I've worked a bit with Royalbroil, particularly on the Mario Andretti and Alan Kulwicki articles. Was it your intention to pass Kulwicki as a GA? If so, great :), but you haven't completed the process :(. The article is still listed on WP:GA review, and the appropriate template has not been added to the top of the talk page. The instructions for completing the review are on the WP:GAN page. If there's anything there you don't understand, I'd be glad to talk you through it. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 21:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

I want Zenlax to do the review. Zenlax is much more experienced than you are and he/she called it first. Royalbroil 18:49, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

My reason for concern is nothing personal, believe me. It's hard to grasp the interaction between the various guidelines without having a lot of firsthand experience. I'm looking for a tough review with many bullet points on how to improve the article so that it will stand a better chance when I nominate it for Featured Article. Royalbroil 05:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I would appreciate a tough and detailed peer review from you after the GA assessment has been completed! Royalbroil 05:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Adoption

I would be happy to adopt you! I have made over 3200+ edits. I am a very kind person. I also have a Adoption Program where (mainly) me and other members help teach you. The other members only teach in the classroom but I teach you directly. If you would like more info about me, please find my name in this list. I also like baseball--RyRy5 talk 20:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

User:RyRy5 has responded quicker than I have. I haven't ever adopted anyone before, so you are probably much better off with RyRy5 since he/she has any adoption program. Let me know if you still want me to adopt you. Thank you for registering an ID. This way people can communicate with you. Anon edits are reviewed a lot more closely than edits from established users with a good reputation.

As a newbie, you probably shouldn't be reviewing articles against Good Article status. You comments on how to improve an article would likely be welcomed by most contributors, and I have appreciated yours. You probably shouldn't have put your GA analysis on the Alan Kulwicki article since User:Zenlax already called it. It's okay for you to leave it, but you probably should give Zenlax a message letting him/her decide the pass/fail on the article. Royalbroil 03:43, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

You should visit the Classroom for your daily lessons. I suggest studying at the classroom and around Wikipedia before I start testing. Good Luck!RyRy5 talk 17:27, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Its quite alright. Instead, I am going to let you continue reviewing the article instead. Please, keep in mind that when reviewing an article, its best to see if another user has taken the liberty to reviewing the article. You can see here and check to see if anyone has taken the time to review an article or if the article is not reviewed. Zenlax ^{T C S} 19:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Testing?

Do you want to take tests from my Adoption Program or do not want to take tests. I do not want you to feel uncofortable taking tests so it's your choice. Thanks.--RyRy5 talk 00:23, 31 March 2008 (UTC)