User talk:Tom.magnussen

Hi

I've responded on my talk page Carewolf (talk) 09:22, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Danish Barnstar of National Merit
		{{{1}}}
		_{this WikiAward was given to {{subst:PAGENAME}} by ~~~ on ~~~~~}

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey tom[edit]

hi tom, im now on wikipedia. --Liam.thomas64 (talk) 07:14, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Stroget.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Stroget.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copenhagen[edit]

Why do you keep inserting this text (Line 378) in the article on Copenhagen all the time? Firstly – and as I have explained to you in the edit summary multiple times – the same survey is already cited in the same section, in the paragraph just below yours (quote: "In a survey published by the Danish Enterprise and Construction Agency and the Capital Region of Denmark in 2008, Copenhagen was ranked 3rd in Western Europe in terms of attracting regional headquarters and distribution centers, only surpassed by London and Paris."). Secondly, your text is an exact copy-paste from this website and is as such a clear breach of Wikipedia copyright policy as well as national copyright laws. I hope that you will respect my request and stop inserting this line into the article, else I see no other option than to bring this (quite simple and obvious) issue to WP:RFC. Also, you should always fill in the summary field, especially when you revert someone else's edits. Respectfully, Slarre (talk) 03:35, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreement on overall layout[edit]

Hi Tom Shuld we enter into some kind of dialogue about the structure of the Copenhagen article or just keep changing it back and forth? I simply don't understand why you oppose giving it an overall layout that is consistant with other articles on capitals. Why do the Culture section have to be split up, the things I group together are the same as in other articles and is music not culture and so on? And why do you insist on all those repetitions in the section about rankings and to cite statements that are clearly just advertising statements and not really rankings or surveys. And why can't Copenhagen Fashion Week be listed under yearly events? And it seems much too long to me, this is about Copenhagen and not Danish fashion, most of the Danish fashion industry isn't even located in Copenhagen. It seems more like an advertisment than encyclopedical info to me - and I think that takes from the articles credability.

Mikkel

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Copenhagen has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ipatrol (talk) 02:34, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009[edit]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to File:Jyllands-Posten-pg3-article-in-Sept-30-2005-edition-of-KulturWeekend-entitled-Muhammeds-ansigt.png. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Closedmouth (talk) 11:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Gail (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Geoff ^T ^C 11:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 11:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy[edit]

There are clear instructions on the talk page stating that the images will not be removed. Neither Danish nor Islamic law apply to Wikipedia, since its servers are hosted in the United States. Please try to establish consensus before attempting to remove the images again. Gail (talk) 11:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replying on the article talk page. Gail (talk) 12:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have given you my opinion, now it's up to you to establish consensus on the article talk page. Good luck. Gail (talk) 12:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And I left you a note, as well, on my talk page, in response to your posting there. (Just click on the "T" to go there.) Geoff ^T ^C 16:23, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phoenix (Operating system)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Phoenix (Operating system) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 11:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]