User talk:Tot-futbol

Hola, ¿eres quien creo que eres? :) Qampunen (talk) 17:24, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tienes razón y estoy totalmente de acuerdo. Un saludo, y me alegro de volver a verte :) Qampunen (talk) 18:24, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hoy es fiesta y juegan muchos equipos en Tercera División y dispongo de tiempo para poder editarlos. ¿Necesitas ayuda con el grupo V, VI y XI hoy? Qampunen (talk) 10:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por el ofrecimiento, la verdad es que tiempo no tengo mucho, te lo agradezco un montón. -tot-futbol (talk) 02:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hoy no podré editar hasta pasadas las ocho. Si estuvieses disponible y pudieses haz lo que puedas con Primera, Segunda o Tercera. Por cierto, enhorabuena por la victoria ayer del Gimnástic ;) Ya tenéis el objetivo cada vez más cerca. No tengo ninguna duda de que lo conseguiréis pronto. Un saludo! Qampunen (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola Raúl. Como me has dicho que estás muy liado te he ayudado con los grupos de Tercera División. Sin embargo, el domingo voy a estar de comunión y no podré editar hasta las siete, ocho... no estoy seguro. Es un día importante porque termina la temporada regular en Tercera División. Si pudieses ayudarme algo te lo agradecería. Hoy tampoco voy a poder estar disponible, así que si dispones de tiempo haz lo que puedas, o si no puedes ya lo actualizaría cuando pudiese. Saludos, amigo. Qampunen (talk) 08:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No te preocupes, suerte con este fin de curso en la universidad :) Qampunen (talk) 20:43, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Entonces en la próxima edición de la Copa del Rey habrá dos equipos menos con respecto a los otros años, ¿no? Qampunen (talk) 09:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mañana no regreso hasta pasadas las nueve. Si tienes tiempo de actualizar cualquier resultado de Segunda o de las promociones de ascenso sería genial, aunque sé que todos estamos muy liados. Suerte en todo! :) Qampunen (talk) 21:00, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Rául. ¿Qué tal el verano? He pedido que mantengan las tablas clasificatorias. Me encantan las estadísticas y es ilógico que quieran deshacerse de la tabla histórica de la Liga. Muchísimas gracias por el detalle del Barnstar. Nadie antes me había puesto uno en los 4 años que llevo contribuyendo con la Wikipedia. Te agradezco mucho el detalle :) Qampunen (talk) 22:13, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Raúl, no sé si sigues ahí pero... cómo ponías en la tabla (clasificación) los puntos de fair-play cuando había empate? Gracias.Qampunen (talk) 23:35, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no ponía valor en el ránquing, igualmente ya está hecho :) -tot-futbol (talk) 23:36, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Me refiero para la tabla de Segunda División. Hay muchos equipos con 1 punto que hay que poner de acuerdo a los puntos de fair-play. ¿Es necesario decir cuántos tienen cada uno (lo ponen de todas formas en la tabla fair-play) o simplemente los pongo sin más en el orden correcto sin explicación? Qampunen (talk) 23:54, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok, te entiendo, sí que habría que poner el desempate de cada caso. Toma como ejemplo alguno del año pasado... no sé si encontrarás... pero del Valencia - Barça del 16-10-10 sí que me acuerdo. Saludos -tot-futbol (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ya lo encontré :). Mira a ver si lo dejo así o si no lo cambias. Qampunen (talk) 00:20, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por ayudarme con la tabla. He añadido los asistentes en La Liga, así como los descuentos en "miscelánea". Por cierto, hay un problema con los refs. Yo no he podido arreglarlo. Seguro que tú sí. Qampunen (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Raúl, no voy a estar disponible hasta las 8 más o menos. Si pudieses y quisieses, actualiza la Segunda. Solo si puedes. Ya ayudaría yo cuando vuelva. Un saludo! Qampunen (talk) 12:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Entiendo. La verdad es que es un dilema. Nunca lo hemos hecho. Yo personalmente no pondría al Villarreal B en descenso, pues quizás sería difícil de entender para los demás que no conocen muy bien el fútbol español. Yo pondría en descenso a un filial si su primer equipo desciende oficialmente prematuramente. ¿Tú que piensas? Qampunen (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No hay de qué, para eso estamos para ayudarnos. Yo he estado de viaje hasta hace nada y no había NADA de Internet, jejeje. Yo no podré editar tanto como antes pero siempre voy a hacer lo que pueda y saber que tienes a alguien como tú que puede actualizar las cosas igual de bien o mejor que tú me da mucha tranquilidad! Por cierto, estos de la RFEF hacen lo que les da la gana con los puntos fair-play. Algunos los cuentan mal y me da pena tener que deshacerme de lo que habíamos puesto hasta ahora que era lo correcto. Pero bueno, hacen faltan sources. Un saludo! Qampunen (talk) 22:11, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Real Madrid Club de Fútbol.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Real Madrid Club de Fútbol.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dudilla[edit]

¿Sabes si el Pichichi y Zamora cuentan para los play-offs de ascenso? ¿Y el fair-play? Yo creo que no, pero igual tú lo sabes. Muchas gracias, amigo. Qampunen (talk) 20:13, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

De acuerdo. Pero cuando empiece el partido y haya que incluir el report, ¿qué hacemos con las televisiones? Un saludo! Qampunen (talk) 06:33, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Raúl, no voy a poder actualizar el Alcoyano y Guadalajara para 2011-12 en Segunda. Gracias por aparecer, crack! Por cierto, el patrocinador del Guadalajara es "Caja de Guadalajara" y marca Joma (el patrocinador existe en la Wikipedia española). Un saludo, y enhorabuena por el ascenso del Reus! Qampunen (talk) 19:42, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Valencia CF season[edit]

Hello. When using templates, please follow their documentations to achieve uniformity across Wikipedia. The ones I edited on the Valencia season page used template:footballbox collapsible/doc. We should conform to the accepted conventions and documentations for each template to maintain consistency rather than implement personal preferences. Thank you!

By the way, you're doing a great job updating the page! :) Vanadus (talk) 05:31, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfD[edit]

Hi. Just letting you know that I have nominated the All-time La Liga table for deletion. If you wish, you can comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/All-time La Liga table. Best, Jenks24 (talk) 20:57, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ediciones Templates[edit]

En cuanto a las ediciones reciente suqe hice en los templates de las tablas de posiciones por fechas en la liga bbva, quiero aclarar que fue una equivocación de la que soy consciente (se que los 3 primeros van directo a la UCL y al PO), (5 y 6 la UEL), y los 3 últimos al descenso. Lo que pasa fue que "alguien" puso esos mismos modelos de tabla en la liga italiana y en la liga sagres portuguesa, y yo por arreglar esos, termine "embarrandola" en el de la liga española (porque son los mismos)...

De todas manera se le abona el interés y la aclaración.Scoelho86 (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Juego Limpio y Positions by Round[edit]

Hola, Raúl. Hoy han salido las decisiones del comité de competición pero como lo de los partidos de suspensión a miembros del cuerpo técnico no lo manejo mucho, lo voy a dejar sin actualizar, no sea que me equivoque. Lo de positions by Round no sé cómo hacerlo tampoco porque no tengo una que me muestre cómo iban los equipos y con qué puntos en la jornada 13. En el fair-play aparece la sección de "closured stadium". ¿Se la va a poner uno al Granada por el partido de 30 minutos a puerta cerrada? Un saludo campeón! Qampunen (talk) 18:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

En la resolución del Comité del Competición (el de Segunda) ponen dos partidos de suspensión a más de uno y cuando es entrenador no sé cómo va lo del juego limpio. Lo actualizas tú? Yo es que no quiero meter la pata, aunque luego cuando salen las clasificaciones verdaderas del juego limpio hacen lo que quieren... Gracias! Qampunen (talk) 23:49, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Muchas gracias, ahora lo tengo mucho más claro. Gracias por la explicación :) Qampunen (talk) 15:01, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, Raúl. Han salido las clasificaciones de Juego Limpio pero al Granada no le han contado la seria sanción por el paraguazo. Te lo dijo a ti, es que no sé qué hacer. La Segunda la he hecho sin problema. Saludos y felices fiestas! Qampunen (talk) 18:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page[edit]

There's nothing wrong with keeping the article in your User space, but you can't have article space categories in your User space. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 00:00, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Fraga later80s.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fraga later80s.png. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Valencia CF SVG image.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valencia CF SVG image.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Valencia CF SVG image.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valencia CF SVG image.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sevilla FC.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sevilla FC.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Europa League and their shades of blue[edit]

Hi,

and sorry for the late answer, but I am not that fast in typing while thinking.:-)

UEFA Europa League colors are indeed not bound to any round. It was briefly considered to do this a few years ago, but had then been rejected as it would not have been very practical from an accessibility point of view. The vast majority of hyperlinks are also being displayed in some shade of blue by the various browsers; this and the close proximity of contrast to black naturally limited the possibilities of visually distinctive shades of blue for single rounds. Hence the season article task force limited the shades of blue to four values:

#BBEBFF is the standard shade and applied in all articles.
#CCF3FF is the second standard shade; it is applied if leagues have teams in two different rounds and used for the earlier round, with #BBEBFF being used for the later round.
#97DEFF is the third standard shade, although it only appears in league articles which have three teams in three different rounds. This is the darkest possible shade and hence being used for the latest round of entry.

This translates to the 2011–12 La Liga as following:

#97DEFF will only be used if there are teams entering the group stage, the play-off round and the third qualifying round; the same applies for two known rounds and one unknown round, as it is currently the case. This will also be the most likely scenario at the end of the season.
If we have only two starting rounds for teams, the regular #BBEBFF/#CCF3FF combination stays intact. This would, however, only be the case for a GS/QR3 combination (if both Atlético finish fifth or seventh or lower and Athletic win the Copa del Rey).

I hope that clears up things a little. If not, do not hesitate to drop a line on my talk page. Cheers, Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 18:21, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now I understand your confusion. The current shade for Mallorca is correct because we do not yet know the starting round of Athletic. The consensus for teams with unknown rounds, at least during this season, has been to give them the lighest shade available in order to indicate qualification (along with the 'TQ' marker, if possible) and then change it to the correct values as soon as their exact round has been determined. Because of this, the sixth-placed team (if Atlético is ranked fifth or seventh or lower; alternatively the fifth-placed team if Atlético ranks sixth) will always have the middle shade of the three-shade range until the Athletic round of entry has eventually been determined. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 18:44, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know if there is a language-related understanding problem or not, but once again – the shades of blue are NOT BOUND to any specific round. This is applied to ALL UEFA domestic leagues. Compare 2011–12 Premier League or 2011–12 Fußball-Bundesliga to, for example, 2011–12 Danish Superliga or 2011–12 Russian Premier League. They all use the same three shades of blue, but have different sets of Europa League rounds of entry. Setting the group stage to another color (especially if it is a purple one, which is usually reserved for the UEFA Intertoto Cup, as in 2001–02 La Liga, for example) is therefore inappropriate. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 17:36, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Racing de Santander[edit]

Hola TOT, un viejo conocido (con otro nombre), VASCO al habla,

porqué no ahorrar trabajo y poner ya donde el equipo va a jugar? OK te comprendo, hay que esperar que acabe la Segunda este año, pero no hay que esperar hasta el 1 DE JULIO para poner que el RACING juega efectivamente en esa categoría.

Voy a esperar hasta la jornada 42 y luego lo cambio, por favor no me "deshagas" de nuevo, un poco de trabajo de equipo por favor.

Buena semana desde Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moltes gracies! El Gimnàstic de Tarragona parece que lo tiene casi imposible pero, mientras hay vida...Además, con lo del Villarreal CF B y todo, aún pueden pasar según que cosas! Saludos de nuevo - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:27, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Real Madrid Club de Fútbol.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Real Madrid Club de Fútbol.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AJ Cham 20:56, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Escut València CF.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Escut València CF.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Álvaro Cervera, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Giant Snowman 09:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Play-Off[edit]

Ola TOT, VASCO por aquí (ya que hablamos de nombres este es mi verdadero nombre, VASCO y AMARAL el apellido, así que llámame por el primero que es más fácil :)),

no prometo nada, ya que creo que paso MUUCHOO tiempo en el ordenador editando jugadores y algunos equipos. Todavía nunca me he metido a editar temporadas u otros parecidos. Si tengo un día bueno, hecho un vistazo.

Estás haciendo un gran trabajo, sigue así. Enhorabuena por el CF Reus Deportiu, un poco más y hasta ascienden de nuevo, lástima por el Nàstic, otro saludo sincero para tí. --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:50, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bueno ya le he dado un repasito. Una nota: he quitado mucho "overlinking" (o sea, cuando pones una cosa entre estos símbolos [[]], ya queda hecho el wikienlace del tema en questión, no se debe hacer otra vez, y había mucho).

Si no te gusta, pues lo siento y puedes hacer "undo". Si es de tu agrado, pues entonces ya te harás una idea para próximas temporadas. Un saludo y a cuidarse! --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Y qué putada lo de Manolo Preciado heh? Creo que no había nadie al que no le cayera bien, incluso al Real Oviedo o a José Mourinho (anda que no le gustan las peleas a este!), en mucha paz descanse - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 22:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ad alcorcón 200px.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ad alcorcón 200px.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012[edit]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Álvaro Cervera. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 08:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CD Lugo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CD Lugo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:37, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Página sobre los play-offs de Segunda[edit]

¿Por qué los renombras a "La Liga" si son de Segunda División...? Rastrojo _(D•ES) 07:48, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Entonces hay que cambiar todos, que están mal nombrados. Yo me basé a la hora de renombrar y adoptar un estilo en este: 2012 Football League play-offs. Todos deberían seguir este esquema. ¿Qué te parece? Rastrojo _(D•ES) 09:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lo dejo en tus manos. Es interesante conservar los redirects. Rastrojo _(D•ES) 22:34, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Valencia CF logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valencia CF logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:30, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Real zaragoza 180px.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Real zaragoza 180px.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Positions-by-round table @ 2012-13 La Liga[edit]

Regarding your current content dispute on the positions-by-round table at 2012-13 La Liga -- it might help to add some text in front of the table, similar to 2012–13 Fußball-Bundesliga#Positions_by_round. The text describes the way how kicker.de deals with postponed matches. It would also be helpful if you remove one of the two sources, especially if each of them recognizes postponed matches in a different way. Cheers, Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 11:49, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish team abbreviated[edit]

Lo que he aprendido es que los equipos como la Real Zaragoza, Real Betis y Real Valladolid, siempre usan el Real igual al Real Madrid. Siempre es Real Madrid y no Madrid, solamente se oye en conversación ligera sin el Real. Si visitas la pagina web de cada club, veras que se usa el Real como nombre oficial y para diferenciar de la ciudad. La LFP.es lo demuestra con el Real y también la RFEF.es. Espero que haya entendido porque cambie los nombres. La Fuzion (K lo K) 00:18, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No entiendo de donde viene la idea que yo "entre en una guerra de ediciones por tonterías". Simplemente note lo que creía que era un problema y hice un cambio. Tu no estas de acuerdo y no lo he vuelto a cambiar. Tu tono de superioridad no es necesario y creo que debes bajarlo. La Fuzion (K lo K) 00:55, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Málaga CF.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Málaga CF.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 07:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valencia CF season Champions League Template[edit]

There is no need to have a template for a table that is updated a total of six (6) times in FOUR (4) months. Absolutely no need. To say that it saves time is farcical and simply an excuse for being lazy. Wikitables have been used for the Champions League for years on end and with good reason. There is no need for a template. If anything it is more difficult to update the individual match information. But do we need a template for that? No, we don't. Stop using the template. Italia2006 (talk) 23:17, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Deportivo alaves.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Deportivo alaves.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Valencia CF season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marko Simic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CD Castellón - Caja[edit]

Hola TOT, un pequeño apunte en este club (y otros si hay más "casos),

en la caja, haz el favor de dejar CASTELLÓN (no CASTELLÓ, que es el nombre en valenciano). El "DE LA PLANA" se quita por motivos de compresión, luego en la introdución está al completo OK? Por la misma razón, en la caja es "VALENCIA" y no "VALENCIAN COMMUNITY". Estamos?

Gracias y buen trabajo desde Portugal - --AL (talk) 02:23, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 in Spanish football, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cartagena and Zamora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 in Spanish football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juan Domínguez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file File:Atletico Madrid logo.svg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Atletico Madrid logo.svg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:Atletico Madrid logo.svg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 10:03, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file File:FCB.svg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:FCB.svg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:FCB.svg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 17:41, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CD Mirandés escudo.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CD Mirandés escudo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Deportivo Guadalajara 300px.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Deportivo Guadalajara 300px.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:AtleticoBaleares.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AtleticoBaleares.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clasificación del Getafe[edit]

Hola, Tot-futbol. Esta mañana he hecho los cálculos y hay un supuesto en el que el Getafe desciende:
OSASUNA 45 puntos
LEVANTE 44
GRANADA 44
VALLADOLID 44
DEPORTIVO 44
GETAFE 44
En ese quintuple empate, el desempate quedaba así:
LEVANTE 14 puntos
GRANADA 11
VALLADOLID 10
DEPORTIVO 9
GETAFE 9
Así pues, se va al golaverage entre esos cinco equipos. Si el Depor le gana al Valladolid 0-2 y el Granada le gana al Getafe 3-0, entonces el Depor tendría -2 y el Getafe -3 y el equipo azulón se va a segunda división.
La aplicación de Marca no tiene donde ponerle los goles de estos dos últimos partidos, por eso, clasifica al Getafe delante del Depor.
De todas formas, si te esperas una hora o así, puede que el Getafe puntúe hoy y se acabe la controversia, jeje.89.7.243.236 (talk) 20:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Creo que estás equivocado en eso de que "en las liguillas de desempate de puntos, no solo se aplican una única vez, sino recursivamente hasta que se desempate". Voy a buscar a ver si encuentro algún ejemplo en otra temporada y te lo linko.89.7.243.236 (talk) 20:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He encontrado este pdf (http://www.lfp.es/Portals/0/intercambio/ReglamentoDesempate.pdf) en el que no dice nada de aplicar recursivamente las reglas de desempate

3. Si el empate fuera entre más de dos clubes se resolverá:

- Por la mejor puntuación de la que a cada uno corresponda a tenor de los resultados obtenidos entre ellos

- Por la mayor diferencia de goles a favor y en contra, considerando únicamente los partidos jugados entre sí por los clubes empatados (en este caso, cinco)

No dice nada de que después de desempatar por puntos, se aplique recursivamente el primer criterio entre los dos últimos equipos.89.7.243.236 (talk) 21:06, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

¿Dónde has leído eso de que "Se puede aplicar tantas miniligas como hagan falta"? Si hay algún documento de la LFP donde se diga, entonces aclararía todo89.7.243.236 (talk) 21:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Claro, eso quiere decir que en el quintuple empate, el Levante ya queda primero, el Granada ya queda segundo, el Valladolid ya queda tercero y la norma del golaverage se aplica sólo a Deportivo y Getafe, pero no dice que haya que recalcular nuevamente una miniliga. Dice: "Por la mayor diferencia de goles a favor y en contra, considerando únicamente los partidos jugados entre sí por los clubes empatados" (y esto está debajo del punto 3. Si el empate fuera entre más de dos clubes se resolverá)89.7.243.236 (talk) 21:21, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ejemplo de desempate[edit]

Te voy a demostrar que tengo yo razón con un ejemplo usando la calculadora en la que tú confias, jeje.

Ve a la página http://www.marca.com/multimedia/futbol/calculadora-liga/index.html y haz los siguientes pasos:
1º) Osasuna - Getafe 2 (esto sólo es para apartar al Getafe de los 47 puntos)
2º) R.Sociedad - Granada 2 (verás que el Granada pasa a la posición 15 con 38 puntos)
3º) Granada - Osasuna 1 (verás que el Granada pasa a la posición 13 con 41 puntos)
4º) Valencia - Granada 2 (verás que el Granada pasa a la posición 11 con 44 puntos)
5º) Granada - Getafe 1 (verás que el Granada pasa a la posición 9 con 47 puntos)
6º) Rayo - Valencia X (El Rayo sube a la posición 10 con 47 puntos pero no supera al Granada porque su head-to-head es 2-1 a favor de los andaluces)
Hasta aquí todo como dices tú.

Pero sorpresa:
7º) Málaga - Sevilla X (El Sevilla sube a la posición 9 con 47 puntos, superando al Granada y al Rayo...¡y el Rayo pasa a estar delante del Granada!)
Si miramos la miniliga entre esos tres equipos, el Sevilla les gana claramente.
Si ahora fuera como tú dices, después de determinar que el Sevilla queda por encima, habría que aplicar otra vez las normas sólo a Rayo y Granada, y como el Rayo ganó 1-0 y el Granada ganó 2-0, el Granada se salvaría.
Pero la supercalculadora del Marca está de acuerdo conmigo: Rayo y Granada siguen empatados después del criterio 3.1 (puntos en la miniliga de tres), y siguen empatados después del criterio 3.2 (golaverage en la miniliga de tres), así que hay que aplicar el criterio 3.3.golaverage en todo el campeonato (http://www.lfp.es/Portals/0/intercambio/ReglamentoDesempate.pdf). Y aquí es donde el Rayo tiene de momento -14 y el Granada tiene -21. Por eso el Rayo se salva.

{{fb r2 header |nt=3 |[[Granada CF|GCF]]|[[Rayo Vallecano|RVA]]|[[Sevilla FC|SFC]]}}

{{fb r2 team |t=[[Granada CF|Granada]]}}
<!--       Granada         --> {{fb r |r=null   }}
<!--       Rayo            --> {{fb r |gf=2 |ga=0 }}
<!--       Sevilla         --> {{fb r |gf=1 |ga=1 }}

{{fb r2 team |t=[[Rayo Vallecano|Rayo Vallecano]]}}
<!--       Granada         --> {{fb r |gf=1 |ga=0 }}
<!--       Rayo            --> {{fb r |r=null   }}
<!--       Sevilla         --> {{fb r |gf=0 |ga=0 }}

{{fb r2 team |t=[[Sevilla FC|Sevilla]]}}
<!--       Granada         --> {{fb r |gf=3 |ga=0 }}
<!--       Rayo            --> {{fb r |gf=2 |ga=1 }}
<!--       Sevilla         --> {{fb r |r=null   }}

<!--
-->{{Fb r footer|s=[http://www.lfp.es/LigaBBVA/Liga_BBVA_Tabla_Resultados.aspx LFP] |date=January 2013}}

{{Fb cl header}}
{{Fb cl2 team |p=16|t=[[Sevilla FC|Sevilla]]|w=2  |d=2  |l=0  |gf=6  |ga=2  }}||rowspan=2 style="background-color:#F9F9F9;"|
{{Fb cl2 team |p=17|t=[[Rayo Vallecano|Rayo Vallecano]]|w=1  |d=1  |l=2  |gf=2  |ga=4  }}
{{Fb cl2 team |p=18|t=[[Granada CF|Granada]]|w=1  |d=1  |l=2  |gf=3  |ga=5  |bc=#FFCCCC}}
{{Fb cl3 qr |rows=3 |relegation=y |competition=[[2013–14 Segunda División|Segunda División]]}}
{{Fb cl footer |orfc=1st points; 2nd head-to-head points; 3rd head-to-head goal difference; 4th goal difference; 5th number of goals scored; 7th [[#Fair Play award|Fair-play points]] |s=[http://www.lfp.es/LigaBBVA/Liga_BBVA_Clasificacion.aspx La Liga]}}

89.7.243.236 (talk) 18:21, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Es una lástima que la verdad te arruine aquello que has creído durante años. Pero es lo que caracteriza a los malos periodistas y en este caso a los malos editores de wikipedia: nunca dejes que la realidad te arruine un buen titular. Si hay que negar hasta la calculadora que tanto has defendido, pues se niega sin ningun pudor. Peor sería reconocer que has estado equivocado desde el 2010 (o antes). Yo te he puesto el reglamento oficial en pdf de la Liga de Futbol Profesional y además, te he demostrado que aplicándolo coincide con lo que dice la página del periódico más vendido en España. A cambio tú me ofreces cuatro links de la wikipedia editados por ti, por tu otro yo (Raul-Reus), tu amigo Qampunen y una ip que debe ser la tuya cuando no haces login. En esos artículos habéis pretendido imponer vuestra verdad sin ninguna fuente oficial, sólo con argumentos malos como los que me dabas a mí (tipo "se aplica recursivamente una miniliga, aunque no lo creas, yo te digo que es verdad"). Los ejemplos "reales" de los que hablas los has escrito tú, ¡vaya fuentes fiables! jajajaja. En fin, me iré a discutir con gente adulta que no tenga miedo a la verdad. Bye.89.7.243.236 (talk) 21:17, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hola, compañero! Soy un antiguo editor que solía actualizar el fútbol español en todas sus categorías con asiduidad, pero con la universidad hace tiempo que me es imposible últimamente actualizar nada y sé que está siendo muy bien actualizado por otros editores de gran confianza que realizan un trabajo excelente como tot-futbol y Scaufape, entre otros. Me alegra ver que hay gente que está dispuesta a seguir actualizando el fútbol español. Enhorabuena por el artículo de los play-offs de ascenso. Cuesta lo suyo hacerlos (te lo digo por experiencia propia). He visto que habéis tenido alguna controversia a la hora de determinar cómo se disitribuyen los equipos cuando empatan a puntos. Yo no llegué a conocer bien esta regla hasta que mi equipo se vió implicado en un cuádruple empate. Yo pensaba como tú, que se hacía una liga entre los cuatro equipos y que si había equipos empatados a puntos que se miraría la diferencia de goles (goles a favor menos goles en contra) en esa "liga" que hacíamos con los cuatro equipos. No obstante, cuando investigué en el reglamento me di cuenta de que estaba equivocado (era la famosa ley excluyente). Cuando hay un cuádruple empate (siempre y cuando todos hayan jugado contra todos), efectivamente se hace una liga entre esos cuatro equipos y se ordenan según los puntos que hayan conseguido en esa "liga de cuatro equipos". Sin embargo, cuando hay equipos empatados a puntos haciendo esta liga, se vuelve a repetir el proceso hasta que quedan dos equipos empatados a puntos, en cuyo caso miraríamos al goal-average entre ambos equipos, NO a la diferencia de goles (salvo que el goal-average esté empatado). Te voy a poner un ejemplo:

Imaginemos este escenario (en el cual estos cuatro equipos estaban empatados a puntos). Hacemos una liguilla entre estos equipos:

Equipo A 10 puntos
Equipo B 8 puntos
Equipos C 7 puntos
Equipo D 7 puntos

Antiguamente pensaba (y creo que es lo que piensas actualmente), que los equipos C y D los colocaríamos según la diferencia de goles que tuviesen en esa liguilla (goles a favor menos goles en contra). No obstante, esto no funciona así. Cuando ocurre esto, lo que hay que hacer es ver el goal-average entre los equipos C y D, ignorando (excluyendo) a los otros equipos que tienen un número diferente de puntos.

Otro ejemplo:

Equipo E 11 puntos
Equipo F 9 puntos
Equipo G 9 puntos
Equipo H 5 puntos

Lo que haríamos sería ver el goal-average entre el equipo F y el equipo G, NO la diferencia de goles que consiguieron en esa liguilla. Sólo tomaríamos en cuenta la diferencia de goles en el caso de que el goal-average esté igualado entre ambos equipos.

Espero que se haya entendido algo jeje. Mil gracias por el trabajo que realizas en Wikipedia :) Qampunen (talk) 23:11, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Elche cf 200px.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Elche cf 200px.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Segunda División B play-offs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CEST (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fraga later80s.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fraga later80s.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Málaga CF logo.svg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Málaga CF logo.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Segunda División B play-offs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartagena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:UD Salamanca.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:UD Salamanca.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:RSDAlcala.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:RSDAlcala.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:18, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013–14 Segunda División may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Malaga CF logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Malaga CF logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:24, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Copa del Rey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elimination tournament (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sd eibar.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sd eibar.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:UB Conquense.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:UB Conquense.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 23:14, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Club Deportivo Tenerife.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Club Deportivo Tenerife.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 04:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fraga later80s.png)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fraga later80s.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:24, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Fraga later80s.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fraga later80s.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011–12 Tercera División for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–12 Tercera División is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 Tercera División until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. C 679 19:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cádiz CF logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cádiz CF logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RC Deportivo La Coruña logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RC Deportivo La Coruña logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cultural y Deportiva Leonesa logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cultural y Deportiva Leonesa logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rayo Vallecano logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rayo Vallecano logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Supercopa de España logo since 2012.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supercopa de España logo since 2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Tot-futbol. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Málaga CF.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Málaga CF.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:UD Almería logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:UD Almería logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jocs2017.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jocs2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Recreativo Huelva logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Recreativo Huelva logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fraga later80s.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fraga later80s.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AD Alcorcón logo.svg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:AD Alcorcón logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Granada CF logotipo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Granada CF logotipo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Tot-futbol. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Deportivo Alaves logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deportivo Alaves logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Copa del Rey logo since 2012.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Copa del Rey logo since 2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:For article Girona FC.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:For article Girona FC.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:OlimpicXativa.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:OlimpicXativa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SD Compostela logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SD Compostela logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]