License tagging for File:Region map small.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Region map small.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
It was fine - I reverted my CSD tagging (I was looking at an old version of the page). It looks fine to me. Again, sorry for the mistake. :) — neuro(talk)(review) 23:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
File copyright problem with File:Paper 1297.jpg[edit]
File Copyright problem
Thank you for uploading File:Paper 1297.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:06, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Problems with upload of File:Database Page.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Database Page.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Image tagging for File:Database Homepage.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Database Homepage.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
The media file you uploaded as File:Database Homepage.png appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source),
or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.
It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media
clearer.
Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided),authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).
If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which:{{subst:usernameexpand|TracyNectoux}} will produce an appropriate expansion, or use the {{own}} template.
If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.
Hi there. I see you've added a link to the website for the Illinois Newspaper Project to 40 or so pages. Firstly, this is discouraged in general per the "External links" guidelines which states that external links "should be kept minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article", which these aren't. Secondly, as you appear to work for the company, this sort of editing is a conflict of interest and pretty much amounts to spam. I'm going to revert all of these now... Thanks Nikthestunned 08:49, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Nikthestunned. I'm terribly embarrassed. The pages I linked to provide information on how to borrow microfilm of the newspapers through interlibrary loan. I thought that would be helpful to those interested. I apologize for causing you so much work. I'll cut that out.
Also, while, yes, I work for the INP, I tried to remain as neutral as possible and only provide relevant information. Should I just take down the page altogether? TracyNectoux (talk) 13:18, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tracy, that has to be one of the best responses I've received to such an incident and for that I thank you! For the most part, Wikipedia doesn't link (externally) to *anything* except things *directly* associated with the subject - this is to avoid the External links section ending up like a Google search result basically, which is just not required here.
The page itself is fine, barring the issues I flagged on it... You've stated enough to show the company's notability, it just needs some attention from an unaffiliated editor really. Unfortunately, it's somewhat on the long side, so this may take some time! You may want to strip it down to pretty much just the company history - take a look at some examples of "Good articles" in Journalism: The Register-Guard, Illustrated Daily News - they're basically in-depth company history, with achievements and (sometimes) failures as appropriate. I guess the page on Microfilm covers most of what you've included here...
I can help you out if you like, maybe give it a first pass and let you fix it up after, if I've made any mistakes? Depends on if you're interested to learn how to write Wikipedia articles in general, I suppose! Cheers, Nikthestunned 14:28, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello again. Considering the work I caused you, apologizing is the least I can do. I've been thinking about it, and, because we're in the final stages of this project, there are only two of us left (me and a preservation specialist). I don't know of anyone unaffiliated who'd be interested or willing to work on it. If you'd like to edit out anything unnecessary, I'd be fine with that. I can follow up after you're done. But if you don't have the time (or desire), I can give it a try. Your point about microfilm is a good one. Perhaps that table should be the first thing to go... TracyNectoux (talk) 14:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Meh, no worries! I've done as mentioned (having scanned through the article I pretty much knew what needed to be done)... What we need now is:
I added an "Infobox" template to the top of the article, can you fill this in with the relevant info?
Third party sources confirming the points made in the article - by third party I mean "completely unaffiliated with the INP" and "reliable" (see WP:RS) - Google News is your friend here! (Make sure you use the "Search tools" and then set "Any time" to "Archives")
The lede should only summarise other information in the article - I guess my removal has broken this and so this likely needs to be rewritten with some stuff possibly being added to the body of the article also (if that makes sense!)
The "history" of the company doesn't need to be quite so granular and doesn't really need so many headers! Multiple paragraphs are fine.
Give me a shout if you've any questions! Wikipedia can be a pretty daunting place! Nikthestunned 15:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Just a quick note to say: Yep, exactly like that - nicely done! References should be done with the {{cite web}} template, or similar, however. If this looks too confusing / annoying for you though, just leave them "bare" (i.e., just the URL) and I'll run a tool over them to auto-fill them. This tool, unfortunately, doesn't work when the references have other information in them though. Cheers and keep up the good work! Nikthestunned 14:19, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning! Okay, thank you for the encouragement. That was good to read while I was working on the page.
I trimmed up the history section. If you think it still needs to be more streamlined, just say the word. I also removed specific region numbers since, without the regional map, they don't make sense.
I did try to code the references like you asked, but unfortunately, they didn't come out correctly. I can keep trying, of course, but I left only the bare urls in case you have a quick and easy way to format them?
It's afternoon for me Not to worry, I've no problem helping out someone who is trying to do good and willing to learn *how* also!
History section is looking much neater, nicely done. I've fixed up the references; don't worry about getting them right initially, it's a bit of a fiddle!
Any chance you can fill in the infobox at the top? I guess you'll know most of this information off-hand... E.g., the location and date of foundation; the locations / assests / key people etc...
Looking good - I filled in the references as mentioned... The only major issue now is that the lead paragraph doesn't "summarise the information included in the article" - it mentions things that aren't mentioned anywhere else which shouldn't be the case. I added some {{fact}} tags to the article where references are needed also, feel free to replace these if you can find some reliable sources for these statements! . Nikthestunned 10:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good afternoon! Okay, I added some brief info., which I hope is what you're looking for. I mentioned the USNP and Library of Congress in the first timeline paragraph to further explain their involvement. But if this isn't what's needed, I might just remove the first paragraph altogether and tweak the second. Would that be preferable?
Also, I added citations for the fact tags, and can I be a dork and say how fun it is to learn how to do all of this correctly? TracyNectoux (talk) 13:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, spot on, nice work! Also, dorky it may be, but is why we're all here - so yea, feel free! Nikthestunned 14:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
haha! Aww, I loved Weeds.
Well, Nikthestunned (Nik?), this has been a real pleasure. Thank you! I owe you many drinks. TracyNectoux (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It's Nik - and my pleasure! If I'm ever in Illinois I'll hold you to that Nikthestunned 15:08, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Tracy. I reverted your re-addition of the list of newspapers. This is currently being discussed on the talk page, if you wanted to join in! Cheers, Nikthestunned 15:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Database Homepage.png listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Database Homepage.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kellyhi! 08:02, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Illinois Newspaper Project preservation.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Illinois Newspaper Project preservation.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kellyhi! 02:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Region map small.gif[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Region map small.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kellyhi! 20:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File permission problem with File:Paper 1297.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Paper 1297.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kellyhi! 09:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, TracyNectoux. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, TracyNectoux. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Du Quoin Evening Call may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
Cheers, Nikthestunned 14:28, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Not to worry, I've no problem helping out someone who is trying to do good and willing to learn *how* also!
