User talk:Uditkanojia

November 2017

Hello, I'm Tarl N.. An edit that you recently made to List of organisms by chromosome count seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tarl N. (discuss) 16:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amygdalin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amygdalin was changed by Uditkanojia (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850698 on 2017-12-21T16:52:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

• the data undone was quiet useful for those who think that Amygdalin helps to cure cancer.
• the userClueBot NG I request you to go through it once again before undoing it.Uditkanojia (talk) 17:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

The material was copied directly from another website, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:34, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Another copyright problem

Your addition to Immunoglobulin G Gut-associated lymphoid tissue has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. The material appears to be substantially taken from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7862810_The_role_of_gut-associated_lymphoid_tissues_and_mucosal_defence. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. BiologicalMe (talk) 19:20, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

My error: your edit to "Immunoglobulin G" was merely disruptive because it broke the formatting and what your teacher says in class is not a reliable source. Inserting it into sourced text creates the false appearance that it comes from the source. It was removed for that reason. Your edit to "Gut-associated lymphoid tissue" was the one in which the verbatim text was found. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies. BiologicalMe (talk) 03:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

You do not ask permission to edit from individual editors. An edit must stand on its own merits. Edits that are not based on reliable sources do not have merit. The article lede is a summary of the article, so it is not the place to add new content. Statements like "it is called" beg the immediate question . Additionally, it is not a literal workhorse, so a good addition will explain why the metaphor is used and the explanation should be supported by reliable sources. That is how Wikipedia works. BiologicalMe (talk) 14:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)