User talk:Undead penguin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Undead penguin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! A8UDI 16:03, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Demon[edit]

Why do you keep making unexplained removals from Demon (Supernatural)? You are removing important information. Ωphois 16:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because it says the same thing after I edited it just less wordsUndead penguin (talk) 17:03, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No it doesn't. You keep removing the demon's statement that Azazel was a "tyrant", which shows that demons were more forced to follow him than wanting to follow him. You also keep removing that demons try and take over, which is not the same as cohesion falling apart. Ωphois 17:09, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop removing it. Ωphois 17:11, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Again, if you want it changed, please discuss it. Ωphois 17:29, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Again, can you please expand on your reason for the change? Ωphois 23:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Never isnt it said that Azazeal rules the demons through fear and yet you put it. That is your opinion which wiki isnt about. its about facts

just saw the episode. guess i miss remembered it. sorry

It is stated in the cited episode that he is a tyrant. It is not my opinion. It is not original research. It is stated in the episode. Ωphois 22:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
CASEY: Honestly, there was a plan. Azazel was a tyrant, but he held us all together. Ωphois 22:13, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Death Note characters. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Even though your reverts have not occurred within a 24-hour period, there is a definite "ping-pong game" of edits going on between you and another user. This would be a good time to discuss the situation at the talk page, rather than via edits and edit summaries. —C.Fred (talk) 05:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments at Talk:Constantine_(film)[edit]

I changed a footnote in your comments at the above-linked talk page to a block quote. The footnote wasn't showing up properly on the page because there was no <references /> tag. Feel free to revert if you disagree with my change. — ækTalk 23:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]