User talk:Valkrasniqi
The problem with your edits are that they are decidedly non-neutral in tone and some of them are copyright violations. We have a policy regarding the tone we use here at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Describing this university as "the premier private university", for example, is decidedly non-neutral. It reads as marketing material. Wikipedia is not a means of promotion. We are not a platform by which organizations can market themselves. We are an encyclopedia. Further, we take copyright very seriously here. We can't accept material that is copy/pasted from another source without a specific release under a free license for that material. Even if we had such a release, it still needs to conform to the aforementioned neutral language policy.
Lastly, while you have disclosed here that you work for this university, you have not complied with our paid contribution disclosure policy. To that end, I am placing a note below this one regarding this issue and how you may comply. If you have questions about any of this, please let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 17:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Paid editing[edit]
Hello Valkrasniqi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Valkrasniqi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Valkrasniqi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:31, 20 December 2021 (UTC)