User talk:VersaceSpace/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
22,587		Billie Eilish (talk)	Add sources
67		Bed of Lies (song) (talk)	Add sources
150		Beauty and a Beat (talk)	Add sources
22		Somebody Else (Mario song) (talk)	Add sources
116		Swalla (talk)	Add sources
42		Wobble Up (talk)	Add sources
159		Gudda Gudda (talk)	Cleanup
11		Leeds hip hop (talk)	Cleanup
195		Same Love (talk)	Cleanup
188		Hey Mama (David Guetta song) (talk)	Expand
37		National Library of Latvia (talk)	Expand
4,346		Me Too movement (talk)	Expand
114		Woman Like Me (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
866		Emo rap (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
551		The Real Slim Shady (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
272		Atlantic Starr (talk)	Merge
156		WWE Music Group discography (talk)	Merge
70		Agricultural Act of 2014 (talk)	Merge
38		Twin Cities hip hop (talk)	Wikify
152		Chicago hip hop (talk)	Wikify
20		Jerry Calliste Jr. (talk)	Wikify
3		Academy of the Ministry of Emergency Situations (Azerbaijan) (talk)	Orphan
3		Barhat (talk)	Orphan
2		Ared Arzumanian (talk)	Orphan
64		Lollipop Luxury (talk)	Stub
161		Freak (Doja Cat song) (talk)	Stub
33		Black Barbies (song) (talk)	Stub
175		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
52		Yeti Beats (talk)	Stub
21		You the Boss (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:26, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your edits to Alexander Wang

In this edit, your edit summary noted that the New York Post is unreliable. Yet you removed the reference to nbcnewyork.com, and left the reference to the Post in the article. Did you intend to do that?

In the same edit, you also removed the text at the beginning of the section, which meant that the second paragraph in the section talked about a lawsuit that the article hadn't mentioned being filed. Please be more careful.

As an aside, I note that you've been blanking your talk page rather than archiving it. You may not know that older warnings and blocks remain in your talk page history, and anyone can see them; blanking the page doesn't delete them from the record. Removing a warning from your talk page is simply taken to mean that you've read it. For more information, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Happy editing, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 11:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

1. No, obviously I did not intend to do that. You could've simply reverted my edit and explained this in the edit summary. 2. I don't think you're assuming good faith. Why would I be deleting warnings maliciously from my talk page? My longest block is all of 14 minutes, so, if you're implying that I'm trying to hide something, feel free to look through the page history as you said. But you're the only one who cares. Most notices on my talk page are just afc responses anyway, so, there's nothing and there's no real reason for you to assume there isn't nothing. An editor (especially an older one such as you), should always assume good faith. @BlackcurrantTea: versacespace (talk) 13:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I apologise for sounding a bit brusque. I should have said hello and introduced myself. The answer to 'Did you intend to do that' might also have been, for example, 'The nbcnewyork page only aggregates other sources, and although the Post is not reliable, it's useful for clearly stating a certain fact of the case (or specific wording related to it)'. Or perhaps you were in the middle of rewriting that bit, were interrupted, and left it there to remind yourself that it needed to be changed, rather than replacing it with a citation needed tag (which, by the way, is not a good idea, even for deprecated sources).

On the topic of talk pages, blank ones are unusual, and unfortunately, I've most often seen them with editors who would prefer that their history not be examined too closely. Most people, whilst they archive sections either manually or by bot, leave something on the page: one of the talk header templates, a quote or image they like, some bit of philosophy on editing or Wikipedia, the welcome message they received as a new editor. For other editors who want to communicate with you, seeing a blank talk page may be a bit disconcerting, and you might receive repeated notices because editors don't always check the page history to see if someone's already welcomed you, or mentioned a particular item of wiki-etiquette, policy, or guideline. However, it is your talk page, and your choice. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 18:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, although you ought to understand why I reacted the way I did when you practically called me a bad person. And for the record, I already had plans to renovate this talk page. versacespace (talk) 05:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi VersaceSpace! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, small question, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi VersaceSpace! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, In need of help from users who can contribute in another language (Dutch), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hot Pink (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hot Pink (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Valentine Greets!!!

Valentine Greets!!!

Hello VersaceSpace, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve, Happy editing, D💘ggy54321 (xoxo😘) 04:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Article for Submission: Draft: The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch

here you go.19:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)19:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)19:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by WaussusBeaver (talk • contribs)

WaussusBeaver, hey! I just checked out the page and made some edits to it.

I'll run down the list of what I fixed:

• In the lead section, I removed the mention of a podcast that mentions the show. This may merit inclusion in the article but not the lead prtion.
• "Home Media" section was removed. Generally in articles about TV programs there isn't a section for this kind of thing, and most articles do not tell you where to watch the show.
• "Episode 10" subsection was removed. Generally a simple google search is never a reliable source. Ever. Google gets information on programming from other websites, some of which are very unreliable.

Also, I just don't see this article being passed. It needs some major fixes and it's already submitted. Cheers, versacespacetalk to me 19:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Okay, Can you contact some of your Wikipedia friends? I want to see if I can successfully get this published, but I have no way of telling.20:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)20:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)20:02, 13 February 2021 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by WaussusBeaver (talk • contribs)

Not sure I follow on your request? I have no "Wikipedia friends". In the article's current state, it probably will not be accepted. There's no way for me to "get people" to accept your article. If the article fits the criteria for inclusion on WIkipedia, it'll get in. If not, it will not be getting in. Cheers, versacespacetalk to me 20:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

FYI - On 4 Feb, IP 174.3.212.76 (who may be WaussusBeaver not logged in) had deleted all the AfC Declines and a Rejected. I restored those. Same IP had deleted Declines twice before that. David notMD (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

FYI- That was not me, it probably was some casual Wikipedia viewer.02:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)02:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)02:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by WaussusBeaver (talk • contribs)

See sock investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Houston,illinois. David notMD (talk) 10:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hot Pink (album)

The article Hot Pink (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hot Pink (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:41, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

We did go over a potential date for the issues to be resolved, but there has since been no more edits on the article or relevant discussion; when do you think you will make further progress by? --K. Peake 21:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I do have school so I was very busy, but it is the weekend now so I have more time to finish the review. versacespacetalk to me 04:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Best of understanding from me as well as good luck with school, but hope to see this article with a good amount of changes over this weekend! --K. Peake 08:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Issues with user Ascribe4's edits to Operation: Doomsday

@VersaceSpace: Hello. As you have seen, user Ascribe4 has been adding huge swaths of text to the article Operation: Doomsday that are full of spelling/grammatical errors, bad sources, confusing wording, run-on sentences, unsourced changes and more. I'm not that experienced with what to do when someone heavily messes with an article and refuses to stop/reverts any edits anyone makes, I usually just edit Wikipedia and then go about my business. I've tried to reach out to them on their talk page to no reply. They did make a short post on my talk page, to which I replied outlining all my issues with their edits, and I also posted a copy of my reply to the article's talk page, but again they have not responded and have continued to edit the article as they please. Is there anything that can be done to undo all the bad edits this person has made and prevent them from changing the article any further? I have no issues with people editing the article but the edits this person is making are not at all up to Wikipedia's content standards. --Hostagecat (talk) 06:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

@Hostagecat: There's no way to stop him from editing the page. You need to discuss on the talk page. May I know what the issues with his additions are specifically? versacespacetalk to me 12:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

@VersaceSpace: I've outlined them all in my post on Operation: Doomsday's talk page. --Hostagecat (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Okay, from what I'm seeing, continuing to revert his edits won't go anywhere, so perhaps try to fix any grammatical/spelling issues with his additions. As long as they're making useful contributions, they don't need to be reverted, Hostagecat. versacespacetalk to me 13:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Some "Old Fogey" advice

Hi there, VersaceSpace. I've just removed an infobox from your userpage that reveals personal information we generally advise young editors to keep off the project. Please remember that every single user page is publicly visible, and not everyone who reads these pages does so with good intentions. As well, as an Oversighter, I've suppressed the versions of the userpage that included this personal information; however, in this case I have wound up suppressing every single edit to your userpage. I wanted to reach out to you to let you know why you can't look at prior versions of your userpage. You might find [page] provides some really useful principles and tips. As a project, we're interested in helping you to have a safe and enjoyable time as you develop your editing skills. I hope you'll understand what I've done, and why I've done it. If you have any questions, you can reach me at my talk page or use the "Email this User" feature. Risker (talk) 04:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

@Risker: Is this change rooted in policy or courtesy? If it's the latter, can you please remove your edit to my talk page? versacespacetalk to me 12:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Answering here, to keep the conversation together. The userbox I removed contains material covered under the Oversight policy. I'll un-suppress the edits that don't contain the userbox if you really, really think it is important to you, but please don't re-insert that specific userbox. Please note that the suppression isn't a courtesy in any way; there have historically been cases where this kind of information was abused by bad actors to [attempt to] place one or more young editors in harm's way. This isn't just bad for the young user - it is bad for Wikipedia, too. Frankly, most of that guidance for young editors is applicable to *all* editors. Risker (talk) 19:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

@Risker: I just read the policy on oversight/supression and it says that information like credit card numbers, home addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers are examples of content that should be supressed. Age is not on par with any of those. Even the title of the section is contradictory to the action: Removal of non-public personal information. I made this information public, and for a reason. If I didn't want the information to be there, I would not say it anywhere, let alone on in a large rectangle that can be seen by anyone who opens my userpage. Putting my age on my userpage will not put me in "harm's way", and if it did it would be none of your business - in fact, even if that statement I just made ages badly, it would still be none of your business. versacespacetalk to me 04:53, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello again. I had a look 'round the age-related userboxes. How about {{User teen2}}? BlackcurrantTea (talk) 09:39, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

I just put that one in, thanks for looking. I had plans to just add that I'm a high schooler but this works too. versacespacetalk to me 12:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hot Pink (album)

The article Hot Pink (album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hot Pink (album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:22, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Super Straight

Your page move just showed up on my watchlist. I would not recommend doing what it looks like you're about to do, which is to move a draft that has already been declined at AfC to the mainspace anyway. It is likely to be deleted. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

I have not moved it to the mainspace and do not plan to do that until this article is reviewed and eventually passed. versacespacetalk to me 02:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

In the future, please wait until that point before moving mainspace pages around, then. We try to avoid having disambiguated titles (like "Super Straight (song)") when there is no entry at the un-disambiguated page ("Super Straight"). Thanks, GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

I moved the pages because the original draft was listed as a "sexual orientation" even though the content in the draft does not state that. That was the primary reason for the move. versacespacetalk to me 02:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

I see that you also moved the draft, which is perhaps all you were trying to do, but you also moved a mainspace page: [1]. It's fixed now, either way. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Super straight (term) (March 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Scope creep was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia isn't a dictionary.

scope_creep^Talk 14:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, VersaceSpace! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! scope_creepTalk 14:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Max Muscato Page

Hi VersaceSpace. I read you response. Thank you for offer to help, I would like that. I'm new to wikipedia and this is the first page I've created so what would be the next step for us to collaborate? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxmuscato (talk • contribs) 05:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey Maxmuscato, so first off, you're not using external links correctly. Instead of linking to your album via external link, you should just cite that. Also, everything that's unreferenced needs to be either referenced or removed. I also shortened the lead, the only things adequate for the lead are prominent details about you, not your parents, or anybody else. Your brother is an exception since he appears to have greatly influenced your work. versacespacetalk to me 16:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi VersaceSpace. I removed the links to my album as you instructed. Could you give me an example from my template of when you mentioned "everything thats unreferenced needs to be referenced or removed." I'm a little confused on that. Thank you for shortening the lead and removing certain information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxmuscato (talk • contribs) 04:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Maxmuscato! Whenever you want to add content to Wikipedia, the content you add needs to be sourced, generally to a reliable news article. Everything that is not currently sourced needs to be either removed or sourced. For example, the majority of the early life section is not sourced. Most artists have a generally small early life section. View: Doja Cat, Cardi B, Bebe Rexha, Pete Wentz, Rihanna. These articles have small early life sections because there's not a lot of articles about their early lives! Other articles such as Lorde, Taylor Swift, and Diplo, don't even have their own sections for their early life, and instead those elements of their life are incorporated into other sections. It's your choice but I would either shorten or remove that section. Also remember to sign your comment using four tildes (~). versacespacetalk to me 15:55, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

@Maxmuscato: hey. I'm writing here because if this thread is not edited a least once per month it will be archived and I won't be able to edit it. If you still need help with your article, I'm here. versacespacetalk to me 12:11, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Doja Cat

 Courtesy link: Doja Cat

So, from what I've read MOS:IRELEV talks about it. One picture per section should be enough for reader to understand the topic, there is no need for two pictures to be featured in a section about one era, since they portray the same promotion curse with similar visuals. For my deletion of multiple image template from 2021 section, I didn't see anything like that in any other article, I don't think it's needed for collaborators pictures to be featured in Cat's article, until they would be seen on a stage together or something like that. Plus, Minaj picture is a little too big, that's why I added upright parameter. infsai (dyskusja) 22:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@Infsai: my question is, what constitutes "too many images"? There's really only two for the Hot Pink era, and the multiple image template showcases her collaborations well. You can change the parameters of the Nicki Minaj photo. versacespacetalk to me 23:01, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Like I said above, in my opinion there is no need for two pictures to be featured in Hot Pink section, one would be enough to ilustrate this era. And about that multiple image template, in my opinion it's unnecessary. Both of those factors made me call it "too many pictures." infsai (dyskusja) 23:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@Infsai: I think it's worth noting that the era in question was stretched out for a very long time, seven singles and over a year and a half (so far) is very long and therefore I think the inclusion of these photos are appropriate. versacespacetalk to me 00:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Long time ago in Lady Gaga article in section about The Fame and The Fame Monster there were also two photos, however only one remained. Taylor Swift's 1989 era also was very long and had 7 singles, but on her article there is only one photo for that era. My point is that even though era might be long, but only one picture would be enough to ilustrate it, since it's only one era. infsai (dyskusja) 08:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Infsai hey! I don't think it's something to fret about, honestly. Also note that perhaps there was only one image in those articles because there was only one appropriate photo. The photos in Doja Cat's article properly demonstrate that part of her career. versacespacetalk to me 12:18, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi VersaceSpace. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 00:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello, I'm VersaceSpace. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! versacespacetalk to me 01:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

NOTE TO VIEWERS: TEST EDIT versacespacetalk to me 01:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

You can try these out in your sandbox if you like, spare your talk page. For an overall look at the warning templates, WP:Template index/User talk namespace is a good place to start. The documentation for each of the templates often has helpful information about when it's appropriate to use them. Happy editing warning! BlackcurrantTea (talk) 01:57, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Dr. Fakher is the CEO of Tipax

I have accurate information that Dr. Mehrdad Mafakher is the CEO of Tipax Company, which works in the field of sending postal goods and postal packages. This company is located in Tehran and has many branches in Iran. I do not know about global branches. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bahmanniko (talk • contribs) 10:16, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Bahmanniko: can you link the article? versacespacetalk to me 16:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Request on 12:41:28, 30 March 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by SamH1991

• SamH1991 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jack Roth (actor) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Could you please improve my article for Jack Roth (actor) as the sources that I have cited keep being rejected and I am new to Wikipedia and creating articles, so I am not familiar with what is accepted and reliable.

SamH1991 (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@SamH1991: you're going to need at least 3 news articles or other reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This means nothing written by Roth, his team, and, most importantly, no interviews. Mentioning this because as it stands most of the references are interviews. versacespacetalk to me 16:41, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Spread_(projective geometry)

Thank you for your review. I have made the fixes you suggested. Jeremydover (talk) 18:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

@Jeremydover: your article has been nominated for speedy deletion because it's a copyright violation. versacespacetalk to me 16:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Versacespace: Can you please tell me which copyright you believe is being violated? Quite a bit of the material is extracted from the Translation_plane page, where it is related, but not core to, the main topic. I have added quite a bit of material, and if published, I would envision this page replacing the ancillary material on the Translation_plane page. Jeremydover (talk) 18:39, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@Jeremydover: my apologies, I was trying to reach someone else. versacespacetalk to me 20:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Dj Kaywise

I got your message about the comment you left on the article draft:Dj Kaywise. I checked the guidelines for where external links belong and where they do not like you said. The external link added is the official website of the subject of the article and that is acceptable according to the guideline you referred me to which also states that the external links should be at the end of the article. Please, is there something I am missing, I'd love if you can talk me through it. also kindly help review the article if you can. Thanks a lot Olakunle Rufai (talk) 22:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

@Olakunle Rufai: For starters, the career section is not meant to be a compilation of the subject's most notable events. It's supposed to go in chronological order of how the subject's career has gone. Also, not all the incorrect external links have been removed. The segments of statements which show news articles that cite him should not be there, let alone should the external links. versacespacetalk to me 01:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@VersaceSpace Thank you for the heads up. I'll work on your recommendations immediately and hit you back. Cheers Olakunle Rufai (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@VersaceSpace: Hey! So I removed the external link you mentioned in the career section. Also, I restructured the career section, to show his trajectory in his career. I played it safe so as not to sound like the subject is being promoted. Please, kindly help review again if you can. Thanks a lot for the help so far Olakunle Rufai (talk) 20:47, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

@VersaceSpace: Hey, I’ve just helped Olakunle Rufai with the edits, Kindly rereview and feed me back. Thank you.

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Anarchyte (talk • work) 14:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:List of cliffs by continent

Where is the citation that links to a policy? I can replace it. Saturn Lover! (talk) 07:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

@Saturn Lover!: "Contents WP:SPLIT from Cliff; please see its history for attribution/" versacespacetalk to me 07:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!

Hi versacespace, I am new to creating wiki pages and really appreciate your help. Hopefully I'm contacting you in the correct way! I was wondering if you changed the title of the page to "Crying Inside EP" because it's supposed to be "Tokyo Bay/Crying Inside EP". If you didn't no problem, but if you did I would appreciate you letting me know how to change it back! thanks again

Hi, please sign your comments. Also, no. It appears @Timtrent: made that page moved. I've moved the page to your preferred title. versacespacetalk to me 00:33, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Request for adoption

Hello, I'm from Kerala, India. I am using Wikipedia with IP address for few years. But I don't know much about Wikipedia other than editing and afd voting? Can you please adopt me? Thanks in advance _signed, Sharath Abhivadyah ^{Talk Page} 11:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Please have a look at this if you are planning to adopt this user Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Phoenix man. Regards Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 12:45, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

@Kashmorwiki: Gotcha. versacespacetalk to me 12:47, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Removing warnings

This is to let you know that removing warnings from your talk page, means you have acknowledged, and read the message. So the next time you refer to anyone as “wretched” or engage in any egregious personal attack, your next warning would commence from a level 2. Cheers. Celestina007 (talk) 12:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

@Celestina007: do you not read edit summaries? i literally said "i got the message" and i only deleted the message because you're the one who sent it (just as you did to me). versacespacetalk to me 15:12, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

and i know you can see this message because you're obviously watching my page. xo versacespacetalk to me 15:13, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

not quite, you attempted to be sarcastic by beginning with “Be gone”. You haven’t been making the most brilliant moves you know, If you are going to edit here you have to “mature up” and behave yourself. At this rate you’re a tad bit reckless. However, i’m not watching your page because your presence here as of now remains inconsequential to me. In your spare time read MOS:INDENTGAP. Cheers. Celestina007 (talk) 15:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

@Celestina007: my existence here is "inconsequential" (according to you) because there's not much I've done wrong. Lugnuts clearly does not care at all, you've been doing the most to try to prove that I'm in the wrong (trust me i've gotten the memo) and the things you've been adding here indicate that my existence here is important to you, because the things you've been saying here show that you think i'm going to do this exact thing again (which i won't, and that's what you want to hear), and I've tried to be civil with you, I even ceased to message you after you removed my comments from your page a second time, because I knew you didn't want to speak to me, and yet you're back for the second time. Stop treating me like an idiot. I don't care if you think I have no experience, I don't care if you think I need referral to the teahouse, and nothing i've done indicates that we're gonna have a problem unless you keep messaging me the way you are right now. Don't scold me for saying "be gone" when you did the exact same thing. And don't come on my talk page multiple times if you're gonna deem my existence inconsequential. Good bye. versacespacetalk to me 16:40, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sip It Iggy Azalea.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sip It Iggy Azalea.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. D🐰ggy54321 ^{(the Easter bunny has been summoned...)} 23:28, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Connect article rejected

Hi there, not too sure if i am doing this right. Just trying to figure out how to talk to people who have messaged me. How can i improve on my article being accepted? It's for a legitimate film. Colinrosssmith (talk) 18:04, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

@Colinrosssmith: hi! assuming you're using the default skin of Wikipedia, in the top right hand corner there should be a variety of buttons which include your user page, your talk page, your sandbox, your settings (preferences), among other things. You can click on the icon that says "talk" to speak to people who have messaged you there. As for your article, you're just gonna need better references. Refs 2 and 3 are unreliable. Ref 4 is paywalled. Ref 7 is a primary source and a bare mention of the topic in general. versacespacetalk to me 18:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

@VersaceSpace: Okay, thanks. I hope You get this reply as well. I've gathered more sources and resubmitted. Colinrosssmith (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Help with Draft:BoomCase

Hi VersaceSpace,

Thanks for looking over my article about the BoomCase. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:BoomCase) I am a bit confused as to why the articles I am citing are not considered published, reliable, secondary sources showing "significant coverage". The sources I have used are Wired magazine, California Home and Design Magazine, Maxim Magazine, Urban Outfitters Blog, San Francisco Chronicle, Huff Post, CNET, Chip Chick, Rolling Stone Magazine, The New York Times, Gizmodo, GQ, Clublife Magazine, DIY Network, Fools Golds Record Blog and some smaller sources. Almost all the sources are well known and reliable, most have done more than "passing mentions" articles about the subject, including interviews and features, and a good amount have been published both online and physically. There are more sources I would like to use such as the books the company is published or certain magazines that are not online but I am not sure how to get access to them or use them as a source. You can see more here that I cant properly source yet- http://theboomcase.com/press.

I based this wiki format based off a similar, now defunct, company BoomBotix (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boombotix) which has significantly less sources and the sources used are less notable than the ones used for BoomCase.

Do let me know what I need to add to get it past a draft.

Thank you.

MistaKoko (talk) 04:46, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

@MistaKoko: hey. you shouldn't be sourcing your content to your own website, or youtube. versacespacetalk to me 11:09, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi,

The website is not mine. So if I remove all sources from theboomcase.com and youtube it would be ok? How do I show something that is published on youtube? Such as the BoomCase was used in a music video if I can't use a youtube source? Should I just not include that in the article? Or like this one "In 2012 BoomCase was featured in an ad campaign for Bosch Power Tools across Europe" (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4pzb_yVixc and http://theboomcase.com/bosch-prime-suspect-x-boomcase/ ) Just remove everything since I can find another source?

Thanks!

MistaKoko (talk) 18:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

@MistaKoko: precisely versacespacetalk to me 18:45, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Cool thanks! MistaKoko (talk) 19:32, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Jonjo4eva

 Courtesy link: WP:Teahouse

Hello Versace space. Funny name by the way. Please do not reply to my post in this way because it was very hurtful and I do not feel it was gratified.

Level 4 vandalism warning placed on Jonjo4eva's Talk page, as every edit to date has been vandalism. David notMD (talk) 14:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

And indef blocked by an Admin. David notMD (talk) 02:04, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Adopt-a-user

You can still adopt me. I want to be adopted my multiple users.@VersaceSpace Starship SLS (formerly IP 64.121.103.144) (talk) 16:08, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

I am struggling with Wikipedia policies and rules. Also, with behavior on Wikipedia and other things. More information at the link I provided in the section above. Starship SLS (formerly IP 64.121.103.144) (talk) 16:11, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

@StarshipSLS: first off, ya didn't ping me correctly. You should use {{ping|whoever}} to ping someone. Second, I'd love to help you! What specific things do you need help with. versacespaceleave a message! 16:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Okay. Just saw your message. Will check whats up. versacespaceleave a message! 16:14, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

You can check my problems at the Administrator's Noticeboard. Note: I am already adopted by one user. I am waiting to be adopted by another user as well, but I would be happy to be adopted by three users! Starship SLS (formerly IP 64.121.103.144) (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

I changed my mind. Nothing personal, but I think that being adopted by two users is enough. Please reply. Starship SLS (formerly IP 64.121.103.144) (talk) 16:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

@StarshipSLS: Whatever works for you works for me! The goal is to help you and if i'm in the way I'll gladly let you be! versacespaceleave a message! 16:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Just so you know, this is nothing personal. But I just think that two users adopting me is enough. That being said, I could still use your advice sometimes. Do you have any advice? Please reply. Starship SLS (formerly IP 64.121.103.144) (talk) 16:43, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

@StarshipSLS: I completely understand. I think the best piece of advice I could give you (in relation to the main issue at hand) is that if you've never done something, ask someone for help before doing it, or at least follow what other, more experienced editors are doing. versacespaceleave a message! 16:46, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Adopting

@VersaceSpace:I want to be adopted. I've been editing for a month but I keep making mistakes. I only edit outer space related articles. There is a discussion about me at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents - Wikipedia. Starship SLS (formerly IP 64.121.103.144) (talk) 15:01, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

@StarshipSLS: sure! What things are you struggling with specifically? versacespaceleave a message! 23:42, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I am being adopted by someone else. Starship SLS (formerly IP 64.121.103.144) (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

yeah, i saw. good luck! versacespaceleave a message! 14:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Nicki Minaj - Yikes

It actually has to be there✌️ Yikes2004 (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

assuming you're talking about Yikes (Nicki Minaj song) that controversy should be in the article but its undue in the lead. versacespaceleave a message! 18:48, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Adoption

Would you mind adopting me? Saw you at the adopt-a-user page, and I'm looking for someone to help answer questions. Thanks, AnApple47 (talk) 06:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@AnApple47: I'd love to help you! what in specific do you need help with versacespaceleave a message! 10:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

I try to mostly edit football-related articles, but I need help with sources, image uploading, and just general help. AnApple47 (talk) 17:19, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@AnApple47: hi! sorry for the gap in my reply. Which of the things you listed would you like help with first? versacespaceleave a message! 13:52, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Can you help me with uploading an image? I wanted to upload a logo to CF Épila, but I'm not sure how to. Also, should I be pinging you? Thanks, AnApple47 (talk) 16:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

@AnApple47: I take no issue with you pinging me! The file uploader will aid you in adding a new image to Wikipedia. Any logo is non-free so be sure you're uploading a non-free image. versacespaceleave a message! 16:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

A request

Dear VersaceSpace,

Although I made an edit asking for a close, please do not comment on my case. I believe you would be biased and unable to come to an impartial judgement. Additionally, when your case closes (and I strongly believe it will), remember what happened to you and ponder it. Because there will come a time when you will want to press the publish button on ANI against someone you believed did you wrong. Reflect upon what happened over the past few days and hopefully you will decide to bring your concerns to a place where it is not a prosecution.

Blessings,

Yaakov W. Yaakov Wa. (talk) 03:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

@Yaakov Wa.: looking at your ANI (which I won't reply to per your wishes, although I'm certainly allowed to), there are currently six votes to topic ban you and only one vote which opposed such a move. Your attempts to grab the wheel of the ship in every discussion you come across is part of what caused this, so I seriously would suggest not doing this. Please worry about yourself. versacespaceleave a message! 03:28, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Pretty Summer Playlist: Season 1

Hi VersaceSpace, I hope you're doing well. Regarding, Pretty Summer Playlist: Season 1, which, after three days, I have just redirected back to Saweetie's discography as it doesn't warrant enough to be an article on its own; yes, the EP is notable as coverage by reliable sources exists, but an article with little less than an intro, one sentence in a section and a tracklist is not enough to warrant an article. This is the same as was the case at Visionland (album). Please kindly see WP:NALBUM, which says "Notability aside, a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged into the artist's article or discograph". Creating stub articles that serves readers with little to nothing to read is not particularly helpful, try to expand them, put in more effort and add more sources/prose. Please take this into consideration when creating album articles in future. If you haven't yet, please also read WP:ALBUMSTYLE to get an understanding of what album/EP/mixtape articles require in article form. Thank you. AshMusique (talk) 09:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

@AshMusique: by labeling an article as having "less than an intro, one sentence in a section and a tracklist" you are essentially calling it a stub, which is allowed. Besides, Saweetie is a popular artist and I had the intention to expand the article soon, so please allow wiggle room here versacespaceleave a message! 16:15, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Visionland (album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Visionland (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visionland (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. D🐰ggy54321 ^{(the Easter bunny has been summoned...)} 02:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Doggy54321 you should consider that the reversions were barely within the same 24 hour period and that I did the most recent edits after I woke up (I do believe we live in the same time zone?). Was a level 3 warning necessary. A general note would have sufficed. versacespacetalk to me 02:53, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Well, if your timezone is UTC-04:00 (it's currently just after 11pm), then yes, we're in the same timezone. I don't choose the level of warning, as {{uw-3rr}} is a single-level warning template. I used it because I was looking through the Ariana Grande page history, and I realized you and Mirrored7 were reverting a lot. Long story short: Mirrored has had a long history of edit warring. I hate reporting at AN3, as I prefer a warning and a discussion after (hence this very thread), but I saw no other option for them as this behaviour has been demonstrated for six months straight, even after an ANI case where they were told by an admin to pretend the undo button doesn't exist. If you look at their edit history, you can see that that comment was pretty much disregarded. But, I thought it was a bit much to report you as well, as you aren't a regular edit warrior. Now, was that irresponsible? Don't know. Am I playing favourites? No. I haven't seen this behaviour from you before, and I thought a warning would suffice. After all, the final decision will be made by whoever decides to review my AN3 report, so we'll find out what happens to the both of you there (as I'm pretty sure someone is gonna catch onto your reverts as well). Thanks! D🐰ggy54321 ^{(the Easter bunny has been summoned...)} 03:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ariana Grande shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
This will be the only warning. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 01:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@Tbhotch: I did three reversions? No more and no less. No policy was violated. versacespaceleave a message! 01:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

You clearly are gaming the system with that comment. From the template above, that you just received twice this month alone: "Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule". You were asked to stop enough times and look for consensus on the talk page on negative allegation about a legally active living person, yet, you continued again. If you are not going to follow WP:Consensus, you are not Wikipedia:Here to build an encyclopedia. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 02:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@Tbhotch: not a violation of wp:gaming at all, that's a very serious accusation for you to impose. I was never told to stop doing anything. In fact, I was drafting up a discussion on the talk page of the article in question (which I assume is what you want). Anyway, I didn't violate any policy and gave (in my opinion) valid reasons for every revert I did. Not edit warring. versacespaceleave a message! 02:10, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

WP:ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. No Great Shaker (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, VersaceSpace!

That helped and saved my evening :-D — Preceding unsigned comment added by UtaNabert (talk • contribs) 16:54, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

@UtaNabert: thank you! glad to help versacespaceleave a message! 04:10, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi VersaceSpace! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 03:51, Tuesday, March 9, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Credits and personnel

Thank you so much for adding the credits and personnel on Meet the Woo 2. I really appreciate it. Now, I just need to finish up the article's lead, critical reception, and promotion, and it should be good to nominate for GA! ShootForTheStars (talk) 18:40, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Article Submission

Hi, I have made the corrections to the article Draft:Abdiqani Sheikh Omar Hassan Please check — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielMaithya (talk • contribs) 14:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

@DanielMaithya: nice job on your successful submission! versacespaceleave a message! 04:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

I referred you and you are invited

Hi VersaceSpace, I am ExclusiveEditor and I am making a huge list of Basic and notable questions with simple and reliable answers which will help new editors on Wikipedia. Actually I have started it just now and it contains only one page. I have named this lists as ExclusiveHelp. You can find its index here. And the most important thing is that I have included a question in it which I asked to you in the teahouse (this,if you can't see it that means it is archived). You could find the page on which I included it here, it is Q.4. If you have any problem regarding the reference of your answer to ExclusiveHelp then please tell me. Also you are invited to add more questions with reliable answers to ExclusiveHelp. Every page contains 10 Questions. Please reply. ExclusiveEditor (talk) 16:48, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

@ExclusiveEditor: I take no issue w this. versacespaceleave a message! 04:15, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Help with Draft: William L. Maxson

Hi, thanks for recently reviewing my draft about William L.Maxson and leaving your comment about the need for better sources. I am going to change those as you reccommended, but was just wondering about the Forbes article that I used - what makes it unreliable? I just want to clarify so I do not make the same error again! Really appreciate any help you could give me on this! Koeksisters are doing it for themselves (talk) 11:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

@Koeksisters are doing it for themselves: please be sure to use Forbes articles and not Forbes contributor articles. versacespaceleave a message! 12:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

@VersaceSpace:Oh! I understand now! Thanks so much for explaining Koeksisters are doing it for themselves (talk) 10:36, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Moving pages out of the way to accommodate a page you created

In future, please just ask for your draft to be moved at WP:RM/TR, or ask an admin directly. Don't move around redirects. If certain admins see you doing this, they won't take kindly to it. Some feel very strongly about convoluting page histories by moving redirects around the place. Moving Roadrunner: New Light, New Machine to Roadrunner:New Light, New Machine then that to Roadrunner: New Light, New Machine (album), then moving the redirects you made to other places was entirely unnecessary and messy. Just ask an admin to move your draft in future. Thanks. Ss112 00:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Misa Tamagawa

Hi VersaceSpace,

I have created a new page [Draft:Misa_Tamagawa]. And I got my first review the page by reviewer. "Comment: Lots of coverage here. i'll decline this nonetheless because most of the "Radio" section is unreferenced, as are parts of "Personal"."

In response, I put a footnote in the "Radio" section, and it was pointed out that there were too many external links. I don't know how to edit it since it is rejected whether there are too many or too few links. Thank you. Shampoooo (talk) 08:58, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

@Shampoooo: hi! Just wanted to note that a lot of stuff in the personal life section is actually supposed to be her career. good luck! versacespaceleave a message! 04:08, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar

		The Articles for Creation Barnstar
		Thank you for correcting Draft:List of cliffs by continent Saturn Lover! (talk) 13:02, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Saturn Lover! (talk) 10:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC) |}

@Saturn Lover!: Oh wow. My first barnstar. Thank you so much! versacespaceleave a message! 12:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Blargh

Covid shot dose 2 is no joke. I've spent the last couple days laid up in bed with a killer migraine and chest pains. I'll get to the rest of the GA review hopefully tomorrow. Didn't want you to think that I was leaving you hanging. Kncny11 ^(shoot) 05:31, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

@Kncny11: I totally understand! I'll see you when you're better. versacespaceleave a message! 10:58, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Adopt Me

Hi VerssaceSpace! I'm new to wikipedia and do not know how to properly use it. I have trouble looking for things to edit and other tools. Unlike Wikihow, there is no "Tools Page" with all the tools. Thank you! TheReptileCatcher (talk) 15:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

@TheReptileCatcher: i'd absolutely love to! judging by your message, you need help with certain templates. Is that correct? versacespaceleave a message! 15:18, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

What do you mean by templetes? TheReptileCatcher (talk) 15:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

@TheReptileCatcher: to perform the large majority of actions on Wikipedia you need to use templates. For example, {\big|chosen text\} (replacing the slashes with brackets) creates (chosen text). There are many others and you see them everywhere on Wikipedia, even on this talk page! versacespaceleave a message! 16:05, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

@TheReptileCatcher: looking at your edits, I see you've created a draft called "the world of caterpillars". There are multiple issues with this draft.

1. We already have an article on caterpillars, so another shouldn't be made.

2. You shouldn't attempt to make a title for your article that feels "extravagant". If you were to make an article about caterpillars (which you shouldn't, since we have one), you should name it "caterpillars" and not "the world of caterpillars".

3. Your entire draft is in bold font. Only the name of the subject should be in bold, with some very rare exceptions.

versacespaceleave a message! 16:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok. That's good to know.

Can i add some of the information to the article that already exists? TheReptileCatcher (talk) 16:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

@TheReptileCatcher: yes! please do versacespaceleave a message! 18:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for answering all my questions! AnApple47 (talk) 19:43, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Questions from Adoptee

@VersaceSpace: So I just realized that the person who gave me a barnstar is blocked indefinitly, should I remove that barnstar from my user and talk pages? Also, do you think I qualify for cvua yet? Btw, just let me know if I'm asking too much questions or being annoying. Thanks, AnApple47 (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

@AnApple47: you don't have to, but it probably wouldn't be a very good look on you to keep it, so I would remove it. I assume by "CVUA" you mean the counter vandalism unit academy? It seems you are not ready as you need 200 mainspace (article) edits to join. versacespaceleave a message! 17:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:That's What They All Say (Jack Harlow album)

Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:That's What They All Say (Jack Harlow album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Early AfD closures

Why did you close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chah-e Soltan, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elisabeth Schjenken, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hive (server) before the normal seven day period? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Simple Songs is completely out of line. Please revert and refrain from closing any more AfDs, as many of your recent closures have been inappropriate. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@Lord Bolingbroke: hi. Thanks for the message. I'm going to revert three of the closes you mentioned, but I'd like to keep the Chah-e Soltan close the way it is since it's a disambiguation page and the basis of the nomination is no longer valid. What I won't do is "stop closing any more AfDs", instead I'll simply close them after the seven-day period, barring speedy closes. versacespaceleave a message! 17:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

What about Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Jamieson, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Drew Binsky, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paranoia (Pop Smoke song), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maharaja's College Stadium, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed El-Kurd (where you essentially did a supervote), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amadou Gallo Fall (really?), and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The House (Porches album) (which you closed as "keep" despite the nominator having withdrawn the nom)? They should all be reverted. I strongly echo Lord Bolingbroke's request that you stop closing AfDs. --bonadea contributions talk 17:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

How about per your own accord, just cease and desist from NAC's? that is, unless you want the community to force you to. Have you even bothered to go through BADNAC? Celestina007 (talk) 19:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

• Bonadea, Celestina007, Lord Bolingbroke, I've changed WP:Articles for deletion/The House (Porches album) to speedy keep since the nominator withdrew, reopened WP:Articles for deletion/Paranoia (Pop Smoke song) and changed back to the article from the redirect, and reopened all the other nominations. My apologies, it was an honest mistake. My firm stance on my involvement in NACs is that it's unnecessary to stop doing them completely, if you think otherwise you can go to ANI and discuss t-banning me from NAC-closes, but it's really unnecessary in my opinion, I've read the essay linked and I've looked at the criteria for closing discussions again, and mistakes like these won't happen again. I was toying around with XFDCloser since I wanted to learn how to use it and how to close discussions, so in a normal day I would never close that many discussions. versacespaceleave a message! 20:42, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

In addition to the disruption it caused, your early closures and then undos of those closures have had the effect of removing many of these AfDs from the deletion sorting pages where likely participants might find them. I've fixed that for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Jamieson, restoring it to the four deletion sorting pages where it had already been listed and then archived, but you might want to take the effort to do the same thing for all the other AfDs affected by this. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@David Eppstein: thank you. I've never been in this situation before so I don't really know how to do this. Would I just add the contents of the discussions back to those pages? versacespaceleave a message! 20:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

No. Deletion sorting pages are listed by transclusion, not by copying contents. The removals of the AfDs from the deletion sorting pages were made by AnomieBOT after the bot discovered that the AfDs had been closed. It is these removals that need to be undone. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@David Eppstein: ok. I think I understand now. Adding these two brackets {{ to both sides of the page title will add the entire contents of the page, just like a template, and this is a transclusion? I know what they are but I've never done one myself since usually it is a bot that will do this. versacespaceleave a message! 22:28, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

No, they are usually added to deletion sorting pages by human edits, not bots. The bots remove them again when the discussions are closed. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:15, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

I wasn't talking about the deletion sorting, I meant transcluding in general. versacespaceleave a message! 01:01, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakash Neupane (4th nomination)

Your close is wrong in so many ways. Please self-revert. Usedtobecool ☎️ 15:53, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

@Usedtobecool: how exactly is this the case? I actually considered leaving it alone until I read your piece which said "I wouldn't mind speedy keep and speedy blocking of nom and their sock either". I'll be happy to revert the close if you can elaborate. versacespaceleave a message! 16:05, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Actually...scratch that. I've taken a second look and I was too quick to assume. Sorry. versacespaceleave a message! 16:18, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Appreciate your quick assumption on that :), Thanks for reopening I was about to ask you what made you think that it is perfect enough to close the afd?? Suryabeej (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in hip hop music userbox

This user is a participant in WikiProject Women in hip hop music.

Aknell4 (talk • contribs) 15:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

@Aknell4: thank you! versacespaceleave a message! 16:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Establishing academic institution notoriety

Hi John. Thank you again for checking my AfC so fast. I have made ammendments to the article, and before re-submitting it for review I'm wondering if the challenges to the subject's notoriety aren't better clarified by mentioning that it's an academic institution, with hundreds of articles about its work published in leading, high impact-factor, peer-reviewed scientific journals (which I argument serves to establish its academic notoriety). My issue is: I don't want to make the argument in the article body via citation overkill. What do you recommend I do about this? Cheers ! Ferkijel (talk) 14:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Ferkijel: the major problem with the previous submission was the lack of independent sources. If you've added any of those (and I haven't checked) your article will be good to go! versacespaceleave a message! 04:14, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Deprodding of Precious (Ours album)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Precious (Ours album), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 03:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Another Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for helping me create my user page. WikiBuilder27 (talk) 19:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

WikiBuilder27 (talk) 19:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cuban Doll

Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cuban Doll, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bottom Bitch (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bjelleklang was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bottom Bitch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bottom Bitch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bjelleklang - talk 09:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, VersaceSpace! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bjelleklang - talk 09:43, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashwarya

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ashwarya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 12:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

"Baddest"

Hi - I see you've redirected this song. I've thought for a while that this song is completely not notable and said so to the article creator, who I'm sure will revert this back. My problem with a redirect is that WP:XY comes into play here... Imanbek also has an article, and has had a no. 1 song more recently than Cher Lloyd, so arguably this would be a more relevant redirect. Anyway, I think if your redirect gets reverted, it's going to have to go to AfD. Richard3120 (talk) 22:50, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi there Richard3120! I have no issue with you changing the target of the redirect. I've watchlisted the page so if I get reverted AfD is the next step. Happy editing! versacespaceleave a message! 23:03, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm not going to change it, but if it does go to AfD, I'll vote for delete for the reasons I give above. The creator seems keen on having articles for everything to do with Cher Lloyd, and has admitted that they have contact with her management team. But I'll wait and see how this plays out. Just wanted to warn you that I fully expect this to be reverted. Richard3120 (talk) 23:06, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Richard3120, yes. I fully agree. And it isn't just Cher, there seems to be some others too. versacespaceleave a message! 23:09, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Edit request: Distractify

Hi,

Thanks for creating an article about Distractify. I'm one of the founders, and just want to request that my name be spelled "Yakun", as in "Yakun" is my legal first name.

If you want, you can write Yakun (Quinn) Hu. Quinn was a colloquial name. Reach out to me at yakunhu@buffalo.edu if you have any follow-up questions. I'm new to Wikipedia so I might not check the notifications.

@Yakunhu: hi! Wikipedia echoes what reliable sources say about the subject. The sources I picked refer to you as "Quinn Hu". Of course, if you can provide a reliable source which refers to you as "Yakun" (preferably a link to a website), I'd be happy to change your name in the article. Thank you. sign your comments using four tildes (~) versacespaceleave a message! 14:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Hot Pink (album) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 20:17, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

@HeyitsBen: can you take care of this? versacespaceleave a message! 20:36, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

@VersaceSpace:  Done HeyitsBen ^talk 06:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

thanks! versacespaceleave a message! 11:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Omnicell draft review

I declined a speedy deletion as I think its assets of over a billion dollars are a credible enough claim to significance, yet I'm still surprised that you approved the draft of Omnicell. Step 2 in Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions requires a check of notability, based on independent reliable sources and in this case WP:NCORP, and I don't see that kind of sourcing - it relies on press releases. Why did you believe it was suitable? Fences&Windows 23:26, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

@Fences and windows: sorry that I just got to this. eh. sometimes i act in error. i guess this was one of those moments. some of the refs are decent coverage but i'm in somewhat of an agreement that the current referencing could be better. sorry about that. versacespaceleave a message! 02:30, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Adopt Me?

Well, I just asked someone unavailable, but I don't think he'll respond.

WikiBuilder27 (talk) 15:23, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

@WikiBuilder27: sure! what is it that you need help with? versacespaceleave a message! 16:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Well, I just need some general help about image uploading, formatting, and other stuff. WikiBuilder27 (talk) 15:54, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

I would also need held with creating a better talk page. WikiBuilder27 (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

I mean, user page. WikiBuilder27 (talk) 16:00, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

@WikiBuilder27: ok! it depends entirely on how you want the page to look. Is there anything you want on it? versacespaceleave a message! 16:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

I want it to (of course) include userboxes and that "This is a Wikipedia user page" that Doggy54321 has (I have no idea how to do links). WikiBuilder27 (talk) 17:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

For the "This is a Wikipedia user page" you will insert the following into the top of your page

{{ombox :::::::| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg|60px|link=WP:MAIN|alt=Wikipedia's globe icon]] :::::::| imageright = :::::::| style = border:1px solid #ffc9c9; background-color:#fffff3; border-radius:15px; border-collapse:separate; border-spacing: 0px; margin-left:0; margin-right:0; :::::::| textstyle = font-size:85%; text-align:center; :::::::| text = '''This is a <span style="white-space:nowrap;"><span>Wi<!-- Wikipedia -->ki</span><span>pedia</span></span> {{Namespace detect ::::::: | talk = [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#User talk pages|user talk page]] ::::::: | other = [[Wikipedia:User pages|user page]] :::::::}}.'''<br />This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than <span style="white-space:nowrap;"><span>Wi<!-- Wikipedia -->ki</span><span>pedia</span>,</span> you are viewing a [[Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks|mirror site]]. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than <span style="white-space:nowrap;"><span>Wi<!-- Wikipedia -->ki</span><span>pedia</span></span>. The original {{Namespace detect | talk = talk | other = }} page is located at <span class="plainlinks" style="white-space:nowrap;">[https://en.wiki<!---->pedia.org/wiki/{{FULLPAGENAMEE}} <span>https://en.wiki</span><!----><span>pedia.org/wi</span><span>ki/{{FULLPAGENAMEE}}</span>].</span> :::::::}} versacespaceleave a message! 20:35, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Uhh... just tried that and it does not work. Just puts Template:Ombox :::::::. WikiBuilder27 (talk) 01:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@WikiBuilder27: just added it to your user page. versacespaceleave a message! 02:02, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

But it's Wikimedia icon on the right, I want Wikipedia icon the the left! WikiBuilder27 (talk) 14:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Oh. Just fixed it (visual editor) WikiBuilder27 (talk) 14:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@WikiBuilder27: looks like you've fixed it. what's next? versacespaceleave a message! 14:54, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Userboxes? WikiBuilder27 (talk) 15:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

And how to do custom userboxes? {{userbox|[[File:Your File.image|pxpx]]|Text|[[File:Optional second file.image|pxpx]]}}? WikiBuilder27 (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

@WikiBuilder27: as in creating your own or using a userbox? For either case I suggest looking at WP:UBX. versacespaceleave a message! 16:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Oh. And how to do barnstars? WikiBuilder27 (talk) 18:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Juicy (Doja Cat song)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Juicy (Doja Cat song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Benmite -- Benmite (talk) 22:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Bottom Bitch has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bottom Bitch. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:04, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Hot Pink (album)

On 27 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hot Pink (album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Doja Cat stopped smoking marijuana while recording Hot Pink, and discovered that her songwriting improved significantly? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hot Pink (album). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hot Pink (album)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

My first article!

Hello VersaceSpace, I'm super new to this and just as confused. I wrote my first article and added sources then submitted for review. No clue where it goes from there or if I'm approved then it goes live? Please advise! Thank you kindly.

Dannjay69 (talk) 23:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

@Dannjay69: hey. I moved your draft to Draft:Lauren Orlando and made some major changes. She's very borderline in terms of notability, however. versacespaceleave a message! 01:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

I think everything else really is self-explanatory. I left a template at the top of the draft which will make it incredibly easy to submit when you're ready... versacespaceleave a message! 01:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Ah ok. First of all, thank you for adopting me and taking the time! I appreciate that. Secondly though, I wanted to keep some of that stuff in there -- mostly her acting debut and info on the "Next Level" film. I think that's very relevant to her popularity.

Also, how do I add a photo of her? I made an attempt but it was taken down due to copyright. Thanks.

73.75.228.17 (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@73.75.228.17: @Dannjay69: hello. first of all, it look like you forgot to log-in, as your IP is showing and not your username. I suggest logging in. I'm also unsure what you meant when you thanked me for "adopting" you. Editors help other editors all the time, that doesn't, on its own, constitute adoption. Of course, if you want me to adopt you as a user, I can, but that would be a full runthrough of how Wikipedia works, and I doubt you want that, I think you just want this article published, which is understandable. The way the article was written, it was sourced to unreliable websites like Nicki Swift, therefore I removed all of that. There are virtually no reliable, independent sources talking about Orlando. For biographies of living persons there almost always has to be a source talking about the subject at hand. However, to satisfy the notability guideline for actors, you need to have multiple roles in important shows/films. Orlando is lucky, because she has three of these roles. Technically, for what you want an article of hers' to be written about, she should not even have an article, but since she's had some roles, she barely, and I mean barely qualifies for an article. I left the fact that her sibling is Johnny Orlando because that's important. Now, images. Wikipedia cannot use just any image, you need to use one that satisfies the criteria for fair use images. The easiest example is that you have taken the picture. If you have other questions feel free to ask me! versacespaceleave a message! 14:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Apologies and Noted. I may continue to write more articles but I guess there's no need for an "adoption" at this point. My goal was to create one for Lauren. I feel like there's a LOT of people/things that barely qualify for an article but are on here! As for the picture, I definitely don't have one of her I personally took so I'd have to borrow from Google, which isn't allowed. Maybe she doesn't need one then. Thank you.

Dannjay69 (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@Dannjay69: okay, no image then. would you like me to move the article to the mainspace for you? that's how articles are published here. if you plan to add anything else, it needs to be adequately sourced. versacespaceleave a message! 15:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

I wanted information on the "Next Level" movie including filming and soundtrack, which I think I did have sources for. However; you removed that. Can we put that back in or no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannjay69 (talk • contribs) 15:17, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@Dannjay69: depends, is there a source for it? versacespaceleave a message! 16:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I cited IMDB, which I thought was very credible. If not, we don't absolutely have to put that info but I wanted to include it if possible. Thank you.

Dannjay69 (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

@Dannjay69: IMDb is unreliable as far as sourcing on Wikipedia goes. See WP:IMDB versacespaceleave a message! 18:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Ah ok. I will look for another source! Thank you.

Dannjay69 (talk) 19:34, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

So I'm finding more links that are hopefully viable. Please let me know if either of these could work in the stead of the IMDB for Next Level Film info.

https://tigerbeat.com/2018/08/behind-the-scenes-of-next-level/

https://starshinemag.net/shytown-releases-new-hip-hop-reggae-single-peace-to-jump-into-summer-vibes/

https://www.soundtrack.net/movie/next-level/

Thank you

Dannjay69 (talk) 23:52, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

@Dannjay69: they are...okay I suppose. You really don't need more information though. versacespaceleave a message! 21:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

WP:Adoption

Hi, I would like to become a adopter, I've noticed your name on the adopter list and wanted to ask a few questions.

• In the Criteria section under the adopter's area, there is "Adopters should have sufficient experience before they start adopting.", how much experience is enough experience?
• What are some tips you can give to a new adopter?
• Do you mainly talk to your adoptees on talk pages or on other texting/messaging platforms?

Justiyaya (talk) 14:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Justiyaya, Hi there. "Sufficient experience" means you should have an understanding of Wikipedia's core rules and policies, as well as practically full knowledge on the manual of style, templates, and tables. Tips you'll want to provide to adoptees vary from person-to-person, although it should always be made clear that they understand the most basic things about Wikipedia before they learn any complexities. You can talk to adoptees on any platform, but Wikipedia should be your primary method. versacespaceleave a message! 14:46, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I think I have sufficient experience... If I have any more questions about being an adopter I'll come to you, thanks. Justiyaya (talk) 15:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

You Right

Hey! I saw that you reverted my redirection of You Right, and, per WP:BRD, now we discuss. While your point about the fact that the song will be released in seven days is true, we still do not have a definite date on when it will be independently released. That is why, in my edit summary redirecting the page, I said We should wait until a date is announced before making a page, referring to the independent release date, or the date the song becomes a single. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 11:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC) (please ping on reply)

Hi Doggy54321, thank you for the message. My interpretation of your reasoning for redirection was probably different than yours, so I'll explain myself. I think that as it stands the song is already independently notable (per WP:NMUSIC), and in my view it's quite clear that this song is the next single. Obviously Wikipedia isn't a crystal ball but we're talking a few days, not weeks or months or years. versacespaceleave a message! 18:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

You're welcome! I now understand your viewpoint as well, thank you for that explanation. The song will be released in five days (although not as a single, so the "released" parameter will stay empty), so the page will be able to have reception and composition sections, which is usually what AFC reviewers look for before passing an article. Since there is significant coverage otherwise, I'm happy to leave it for now. Lastly, we technically are talking weeks and months. The latest date Doja Cat could release this song as a single is December 31, which is six and a half months away. It's ultimately up to how she wants the album rollout to go, but I do think that it will come in the next month. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 22:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

• The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
• Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
• Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
• Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
• Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
• BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello VersaceSpace:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 3000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

DYK for Need to Know (Doja Cat song)

On 8 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Need to Know (Doja Cat song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Doja Cat and her directors used Blade Runner and The Fifth Element as reference points while making the music video for "Need to Know"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Need to Know (Doja Cat song). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Need to Know (Doja Cat song)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:03, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

KMM

Hey! Could we please promote KMM to GA status together since I basically carried that article? Nice to see you back :) —cybertrip👽 ( 💬 • 📝) 17:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

@Cybertrip: yes. feel free to add yourself. versacespaceleave a message! 17:46, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Coping Mechanisms

Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Coping Mechanisms, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kiss Me More

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kiss Me More you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Motley Crew (song)

Hello! Your submission of Motley Crew (song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pamzeis (talk) 07:59, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Motley Crew (song)

Hello, and thank you for nominating Motley Crew (song) for Did you know. Please return to the nomination as it has now been marked for closure given your lack of response to the earlier message by Pamzeis. If you do not return the nomination soon, it may be closed as unsuccessful. Thank you and happy editing. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:41, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kiss Me More

The article Kiss Me More you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kiss Me More for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:01, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Will you go beyond the first section of this review anytime soon? --K. Peake 08:34, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Dumisani Dlamini

Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dumisani Dlamini, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kiss Me More

The article Kiss Me More you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Kiss Me More for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:01, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Stained Glass (song)

Hello, VersaceSpace. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stained Glass (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)