User talk:VivereInPace

Welcome!

Hello, VivereInPace, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 10 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Khaz'al Khan al-Kaabi page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Al-Riyāḍ al-Khazʻalīyah fī al-siyāsah al-insānīyah

Hello VivereInPace,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Al-Riyāḍ al-Khazʻalīyah fī al-siyāsah al-insānīyah for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. 1900toni (talk) 14:10, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2018

Hello, I'm Abequinn14. I noticed that in this edit to Khaz'al Khan al-Kaabi, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Abequinn14 (talk) 22:06, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mohammed Saeed Al Sheikh Khaz'al

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Mohammed Saeed Al Sheikh Khaz'al requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 13:49, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Mohammed Saeed Al Sheikh Khaz'al for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammed Saeed Al Sheikh Khaz'al is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Saeed Al Sheikh Khaz'al until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 14:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Emirate of Arabistan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Emirate of Arabistan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –eggofreason^{(talk · contribs)} 20:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Informations for your article

Hi there you might find this informations useful for your recent engagement of the topic Arabistan Emirates

Travel literature to Khuzistan by Persian officials

Mirza Abdul Ghafar Esfahani named Najm al-Dawlah and Najmalmalek, was the Persian counselor of Iranian government in 19th century, He was well known for his work in geography, geology, and mapping. In his book "A travel to Arabistan" that he wrote in 1882 which later and in pahlavi era republished with the New title "A travel to Khuzestan" he describes Khuzistan and Its inhabitants in detail:

Mirza abdul ghafar: "Without bribe and service Ajams (Persians) does not have any presence here and does not dare to stop in the place. The whole land of Khuzestan and specially falahia district (today Shadegan), are a part of Iran only by name! and It's all due to our ignorance toward them, they consider us (Iranians) to be alien in a degree that they're in shocke to see a blackhated (Persian custome) among them. Their women do not have a veil, only in front of Ajams (Persians), whom are hated by them and they run away from them, this is all due to our lack of connection with them, It is obligatory to settle down there from each class of Ajams (Persians),from merchants and the people of industries, and farmers, priests, and the millitary, and businessmen, so much so that their number Will overcome the Arabs!"

You can find and download the book for free from here : https://archive.org/details/SafarnamehKhouzestan

Ted hamiltun (talk) 19:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Also these are two maps I extract from book "Contributions to the anthropology of Iran page 161 / by Henry Field 1939", about Arabistan and arab inhabitants of southern Persia :

Arabistan in 1939

Arab inhabitants of persia

May 2020

Hello, I'm DrKay. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Khaz’al Khan Ibn Haji Jabir Khan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 11:26, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Khaz’al Khan Ibn Haji Jabir Khan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I also broke 3RR but I've reverted my fourth revert. You should do the same. DrKay (talk) 13:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 13:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Emirate of Arabistan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emirate of Arabistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emirate of Arabistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HistoryofIran (talk) 11:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:16, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Emirate of Arabistan, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:29, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

I am adding referenced sources, you are the one disrupting

The source you removed, from Minority Right in the Middle East literally states, PAY ATTENTION, "Until 1925, this region was an autonomous emirate known as Arabistan. In 1925, central control was imposed by military force and, in 1936, the province was renamed Khuzestan..." Page 176 https://books.google.ae/books?id=9VHRny2tWgcC&printsec=frontcover&dq=minority+rights+in+the+middle+east&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiW797F-JP4AhWvwQIHHT03CD0Q6AF6BAgJEAI#v=onepage&q=arabistan&f=false VivereInPace (talk) 13:52, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Not my problem that you aren't citing the source properly. It was not part of the Minority Rights in Iraq section, a quick Ctrl + F showed zero mentions of Arabistan. Anyways, isn't it funny that you keep using non-specialized sources in this article? --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:14, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

I checked the source, it doesn't seem to be written by a historian, and the same page has a bizarre statement about "Sunni Ahwazis who live in Southern Khuzestan near Bandar Abbas", even though Bandar Abbas is nowhere near Khuzestan and has no relation to historic Arabistan province. --Qahramani44 (talk) 01:02, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)