User talk:Warrior on Terrorism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello Warrior on Terrorism! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 07:24, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


US Casualties of War[edit]

Thank you for updating the casualties of the Afghan war. Where are you getting your figures? I used to get them from www.defenselink.mil, but they deleted that link. Czolgolz 13:50, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I appriciate you updated figures on what's amounting to a forgotten war. Czolgolz 20:15, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ho Chi Minh Trail[edit]

Howdy! Thanks for the revisions on VPA/PAVN (I was about to do that any way). As to the use of Viet Cong, I find it distressing. The name of the organization for which those men and women fought and died was the National Liberation Front, not some perjorative title imposed on them by Ngo Dinh Diem. I know, most Americans would not know the NLF if it jumped up and bit them, but I was under the impression that we were supposed to strive for historical accuracy. How would you like it if I edited the article on the American Civil War and altered every mention of the United States Army, the Union Army, or the Federal Army to, say, the "damn Yankee Army"? RM Gillespie 20:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Revert vandalism" on 2004-2006 Waziristan conflict[edit]

Content disputes, which is exactly what is happening on 2004-2006 Waziristan conflict cannot be considered vandalism. Further wholesale reverts of HanzoHattori's (or anyone's) good faith edits and characterizing them as vandalism may result in you being blocked from editing for a period of time for violating Wikipedia's policies of WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. Since this is not vandalism, whenever you decide you do not like an edit by HanzoHattori, you must give a reason for the revert, either in the edit summary, or, if complex, on the talk page after making a note of that in the edit summary. If you do revert, you are required to re-insert any parts of the edit which are non-controversial and contribute to the article (such as wikilinking important terms, grammar and spelling corrections, and non-controversial and useful content additions). Please play fair.  OzLawyer / talk  14:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user . As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All your edits have been reverted.
If you believe this block to be unjustified, you can contest it by adding {{unblock|reason}} on this page, replacing reason with an explanation of why you think this is an unjust block. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.
TomTheHand 21:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence[edit]

If I may step in, I believe the "evidence" you're looking for is under the link Netsnipe provided, if you would only click on it. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 04:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject:Terrorism[edit]

Greetings,

I was hoping I could get some input from you, about the proposed mergerof Wikipedia:WikiProject Terrorism and counter-terrorism with Wikiproject:Terrorism. It seems there's a lot of overlap between the two projects, and if we spent a few days merging the lists of articles, sharing ideas and collaborating on improving the same articles which both projects are focused on improving...we could really make some headway. Whether you're in favour, or against, the idea of a merger - I'd appreciate some feedback regardless. Much thanks. Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 21:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Terrorism Newsletter[edit]

The Terrorism WikiProject
April 2008 Newsletter

News

ArchivesDiscussion

Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead) 05:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]