User talk:Whoamiwilli

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Whoamiwilli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

December 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dawn Bard. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Linda (name), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dawn Bard (talk) 22:26, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For now I think the only source could be Google Translate. Linda in Albanian language means "born/i was born", and it's a very common name in Albanian speaking territories

RE: Disney Channel (Albania)[edit]

I can make a request to delete the article since the references available in the mentioned article are not sufficient enough to prove there's an actual Disney Channel airing in Albania. If you can provide them, it'd be nice. For now, the article will redirect to the EMEA variant. --Bankster1 (talk) 05:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did find proofs, thanks for the advice -Whoamiwilli 11:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contact[edit]

Hello. Is there a place I can contact you (via Facebook or Skype)? I want to talk to you if you don't mind. Palettepony895 (talk) 17:26, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gmail? 16:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Facebook works too, how can I find you?
I can be found here. Palettepony895 (talk) 15:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I sent you a friend request as it's unavailable to message you

Summaries[edit]

You're not an administrator from Wikipedia. Therefore, you don't have any right to write these kind of summaries, considering your block logs. Moderate your language. -Bankster1 (talk) 22:22, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not but I can make a request to one. Reminding you that you're not either. 16:08, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
No, you don't have any right to threaten someone he will be banned, and that attitude can be sanctionable. Thus, you can't make a request to do these kind of summaries at all. I repeat, moderate your language. -Bankster1 (talk) 15:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A "threatening" and a "warning" are two complete different things. I'm guessing you know well that edit wars can result in blocking according to Wikipedia's rules and policies. Peace!
That's needless to say. I suppose the first time you were blocked for war editing you just realised over that rule, so don't go on people trying to be Wiki's cop before looking on your records. No one's gonna take your "warnings" in a good way. --Bankster1 (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You don't even know what happened when I got blocked so stop mentioning it over and over again. This user kept reverting my edit even though his version was incorrect, we were arguing about this particular sentence: "Some modern historians in Albania claim that modern Albanian language might have descended from a southern Illyrian dialect." This hypothesis was first claimed by foreigners and not "modern historians in Albania" (which btw sounds like a third grade essay writing). Johann Erich Thunmann (Swedish) was the first to claim this in 1774, also Eric P. Hamp (American), and several others. Even though I did provide references to this, he kept deleting them and keeping an expired reference "404. That’s an error." He took advantage of my 3rd revert, which is the maximum time of reverting in 24h and then made a request to block me. Whoamiwilli (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't even care why you were blocked. You're being an hypocrite trying to "warn" users who were editing before your account was created about the Three Revert Rule, which is pretty obvious to know for an experienced user, while also having a block on your records for the same thing. Don't try to change the subject of this matter, since you're doing the same thing that caused you to be suspended from Wikipedia for a while. Even another experienced user warned you about the issue on the "Albanian" Disney Channel and since you didn't care, he proposed the article for deletion. --Bankster1 (talk) 23:46, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"you're doing the same thing that caused you to be suspended from Wikipedia for a while." No I'm not, you were doing this, you were the one insisting to redirect the page into another page, insisting that Disney Channel Albania is in fact "EMEA" without any proof. And you have definitely passed the limit of 3 reverts. That's why talk pages exist, reverts can't be done multiple times without a detailed explanation which has to be discussed in the talk page. Whoamiwilli (talk) 01:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. You're doing it as well, reverting my edits, giving useless warnings to an already experienced user. When I redirected the article there was no references provided for the article to be existing as it is. That's why I wanted to merge it with the EMEA variant, because the only websites you cited were an outdated "Albanian Disney Channel" schedule from 2015, a bulletin from Digitalb that Violetta was going to premiere over there and some unavailable video that got lost because the account that hosted it was closed. Besides, you were the first on reverting my redirect to the EMEA channel, and you're just blaming me for breaking it when you actually did it first. We're involved on this issue at the same level, so don't try to excuse yourself. The explanation of my reverts against you were on the summaries. Go read them. --Bankster1 (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When this page was created the links were all working, it wasn't my fault that they expired but even though I provided every single reference I could find you still kept reverting them. I did see those explanations but it should've been discussed on a talk page rather than just reverting it a hundred times, that's no good for both of us Whoamiwilli (talk) 09:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Disney Channel (Albania) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]