User talk:Wi Account ki

Welcome!

Hello, Wi Account ki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! JACO PLANE • 2007-04-18 22:00

TimeSplitters 2[edit]

Hey about your edit when you removed the trivia section, I think it would be better to keep that in there until you can integrate it into proper sections of the article. Also I'd recommend using edit summaries from now on (the box at the bottom) so people know what you're doing and why. Finally, you might want to add something to your userpage since it makes your name a red link when nothing is there.--Clyde (talk) 04:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PP means paragraph, and I reccommend that the reception be expanded. Perfect Dark has some more critical opinions, and more quotes about what they really liked or didn't like. If the text is expanded, I think the publication box should be expanded too (it has no name, I made one up, but yes it's the box with all the scores). I think the external links are good, but if you use the IGN review in the reception section, I would say leave it out of the external links. I'd also say to add "expand reception" onto your nifty list.--Clyde (talk) 22:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is deserving a B rating, and marked as such. Good work so far, perhaps see if Krator has more suggestions (he did the original rating). If you go to VG, it will probably get the same response, so I did it for you.--Clyde (talk) 02:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect Dark[edit]

I'm just wondering if you can explain what form of improvement can be made to improve Perfect Dark, already a featured article, as per your contribution to its discussion page. Connell66 09:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Sorry for the wait, I haven't been on much. If you didn't just look on your own, this says it all. It's really your choice and what suits the article better, although gameplay first is preferred.--Clyde (talk) 00:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you can mention it in the legacy or something, just make sure it is referenced, encyclopedic, prose, and non-trivial. I'm wary, but go ahead. BTW, it's not in good taste to go around mocking other articles on their talk page. People who consider the article their opus at an immature stage will and have taken offense. Those people are in the same boat as us, trying to improve articles.--Clyde (talk) 02:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:TS2 Spacestation.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TS2 Spacestation.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TS2 Japan.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TS2 Japan.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Andy^reply 23:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:TS2 Chicago.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TS2 Chicago.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TS2 Japan.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TS2 Japan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:54, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]