User talk:Wikieditor4206946

February 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Venkat TL. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 07:56, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 08:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 08:25, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikieditor4206946 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can understand that I don't understand your very scrict rules regarding harassment, but if pointing out someone's bias is harassment then I'm content with being banned, because I don't think you're being fare, you can not create a utopia by sewing people's mouth shut, you can silence people, but you can't silece facts. Although I had my doubts before, now I'm sure Wikipedia editors are in bed with each other, it's a syndicate, it's a cartel, that only talks from one perspective and one perspective alone. I know you don't care, but if you want further proof of the bigotry, see this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Punjab_Legislative_Assembly_election#Opinion_polls, the very similar opinion polls by very same agencies have been removed by the author in question solely based on a single unverfied/non-reviewd new article, but he won't remove these because his favourite party is winning there (I know because user-edit history is public). If the end result of your no-peronal-discussion is a biased Wikipedia, then to hell with such ecosystem and to hell with Wikipedia. Khuda Hafiz

Decline reason:

User is "content with being banned". Despite being blocked not (yet) banned, there's nothing to do here. Cabayi (talk) 13:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.