User talk:Wincem

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Wincem, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Govvy (talk) 17:11, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly reminder[edit]

Here in English Wikipedia, there are different standards. Verifiability, not truth. Any extraordinary claims must be from reputable, secondary sources that cites where their information are from with proper references demonstrating credible evidence of research. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. Alex Shih (talk) 16:11, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning. If you add unverifiable information back again without obtaining consensus on the talk page, you will lose your editing privilege. Feel free to communicate with me in Chinese if you feel language is an issue. Alex Shih (talk) 01:56, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Stephen Chow.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih (talk) 02:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To be unblocked, you need to make a convincing statement that you understand and will abide by basic English Wikipedia policies, which includes WP:Verifiability, WP:Identifying reliable sources (in particular user-generated content), and most important of all, WP:No original research. Also, please note that remarks like this are borderline personal attack (focus on the content, not the contributor), and this comment is also unacceptable as it is blatant violation of WP:Civility. Alex Shih (talk) 02:30, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

这跟周星驰的条目没有关联。即使是在中文维基，zh:Wikipedia:非原创研究 (维基百科不是发表原创研究或原创观念的场所), zh:Wikipedia:可供查證 (请阁下看可疑来源的解释) 也是所有编辑者必须要遵守的指引. Translation for reviewers: This has nothing to do Stephen Chow. Even in Chinese Wikipedia, WP:OR (Wikipedia is not a place to publish original research or thoughts), WP:RS (Please take a look at the explanation of questionable sources) are policies that must be followed by all editors. Alex Shih (talk) 02:42, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]