User talk:Wowovr2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


File copyright problem with File:Palacio Baburizza.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Palacio Baburizza.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:45, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TAR16 Singapore leg photo[edit]

The Singapore Flyer is a better choice for a photo for the leg as it is the Fast Forward location and has more to do with the leg than the photo of the Victoria Concert Hall and a really long caption about Allan Wu being in the US series.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 04:46, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR[edit]

Do not change editing in The Amazing Race 16, you causing WP:3RR. If you continue editing the article, you will be blocked from editing. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 11:00, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm sure that the FF is first and I apologize for forgetting the WP:3RR.Wowovr2 (talk) 11:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TAR16 Fast Forward[edit]

Please stop editing in leg 9 section, do not change it per consensus on talk page. If you continue editing, you will blocked from Wikipedia. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 01:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Amazing Race 16. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 12:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]