User talk:Writerkid08

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from James Kirchick. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 03:51, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at James Kirchick, you may be blocked from editing. SilverserenC 23:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

James Kirchick[edit]

The reason why I, and others, reverted you is because, in edits like this, you were removing a number of references that had been added to the article, with no explanation in the edit summary as to why you were doing this. Most editors will just see this as vandalism and in light of who the subject of that article is and the other new editors that were doing similar activities, it seemed like you were trying to push a positive or negative POV (Point of View) in the article. Remember, Wikipedia articles are meant to be neutral and not favor one side or another. Articles are meant to only reflect published material that has been written about the subject. SilverserenC 01:04, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've protected the article to prevent editing temporarily. Please discuss the changes that you want made at Talk:James Kirchick#Ron Paul info.--Slon02 (talk) 03:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can you please stop removing information from the sources? If Kirchick states he was never contacted, then we add that to the article, we don't remove the statement by Fox19 saying they hadn't received a reply from him. SilverserenC 23:18, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]