User talk:Wtroopwept

Welcome!

Hello, Wtroopwept, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ^Blank ^Verse 18:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sailboat infobox[edit]

I didn't catch that the hull weight was not showing. I tried to fix it in the raw code but I can't figure it out. You can take a look at Template:Infobox Sailboat Specifications. Thanks for the catch.Minnesota1 03:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phantom (sailboat)[edit]

Hello. I spotted a new dinghy article, Phantom (sailboat), set up by a new user. I've lent a hand WRT adding a few things, but there's a limit to my expertise in this area. So, as I spotted you've been involved in related articles, I thought I'd pass on the news to you, so you can alert interested parties. Thanks. --Turnipface 13:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DreamHost[edit]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at DreamHost. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. GreenJoe 17:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steven Callahan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steven Callahan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven Callahan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 21:59, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So glad I worked hard on an article that was proposed for deletion. Reason #768 not to work on Wikipedia.

AfD donga[edit]

Nomination of Donga_(ditch) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donga_(ditch) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donga_(ditch) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Wtroopwept. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amish in popular culture for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amish in popular culture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amish in popular culture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]