User talk:Wtstoffs/Archive 2

Image copyright problem with File:1995 Florida Tennessee SI.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:1995 Florida Tennessee SI.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:1995 Florida Tennessee SI.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:1995 Florida Tennessee SI.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Neonopolis May 2010.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Neonopolis May 2010.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:01, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't log in much and am sad to see an image I took my my second city gone, but the photo was taken by me and clearly licensed via GNU. Now I have to upload it again. Thanks, Wikipedia. WTStoffs (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neonopolis May 2010.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Neonopolis May 2010.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]