User talk:Xpërt3

What are you doing

The source you used in the article Abdulaziz of Saudi Arabia was first used on 29 April 2012, so it was combined and the access date was corrected. Therefore, access date will be changed because it was first used on this date, okay?

Please do not do such nonsense, unnecessary edits, thanks, --Egeymi (talk) 11:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

@Egeymi: I will keep that mind in next time as I'm always trying to improve since I haven't been on Wikipedia for a long time. But please keep in mind that in contrast, you have been here for nearly 9 years. You do not need to speak to me in such an improper manner. Xpërt3 (talk)

Then please or at least read what I write in the edit summary. Such edits just waste my time. I stated similar things to you when you were using the other name. --Egeymi (talk) 12:43, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't think lying is a good habit. This issue that happened has nothing to do with past edits. The only edit summaries that you made were about overlinked words. That's all. Only a few hours ago, you used shortened words to point out the issue. I did not understand what you meant until now. Now returning to the main topic, you shouldn't make false accusations and excuses like "I stated similar things to you" to fit your argument. It's not going to help either of us. Also, you could've edited my talk page or communicated with me earlier if you found these edits to be so troublesome. Xpërt3 (talk)

No, I am not lying, I refer to my communication with you when you were using the name, Schoudhury3, okay. You could not accuse me of being a liar. --Egeymi (talk) 14:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Why do you keep making excuses on top of excuses? Honestly, it's a shame that an editor like you would speak to others in such a childish and immature manner. You should be nicer to your fellow Wikipedians. Xpërt3 (talk)

Use tags

There is a bunch of useful tags that you can wrap your proposals around like {{divbox}} e.g.

Hope my unsolicited advice is welcome.--AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 18:34, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Zakir Naik

Assalamualaikum brother, I know you from the edits of Zakir Naik. I've been editing Naik from the past three months. Earlier the wiki of Zakir was having so many flaws. Just like Indian media, the editors here declared him a terrorist. Thank you for your cooperation it is much better now. But some editors just because they hate Naik are constantly ruining the page. Beware of them. Right now I'm more focused on the hindi version of Zakir's wiki .. Please you look out here Maaz143 (talk) 04:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

@Maaz143: I agree, the English version of the article was much worse than before. I corrected most of these problems, but some areas need some work. I have been busy lately, so I haven't been able to correct some areas unfortunately. I think the article is in decent form, but needs work. Although we both believe that Zakir Naik is not a terrorist, it is true that other people believe he is and we need to include their opinions. The article ONLY has opinions that Zakir Naik is a terrorist, but NO opinions about Zakir Naik not being a terrorist. I will soon add the opinion that Zakir Naik is not a terrorist. I'll always be here to cooperate and help if you need it. Xpërt3 (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Sure I'll help you too SuvarnaAdhikari (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

I appreciate the help from all of you. I hope that we can stop the editors who are causing disruptions. Xpërt3 (talk) 23:38, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes ! Suvarna and I are working on hindi wiki of Naik. Please let us know if you need any help Maaz143 (talk) 14:43, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

@Maaz143: @SuvarnaAdhikari: I need the two of you to go onto the English talk page on Zakir Naik and go to the "Mass Content Removal" section and vote with consensus please. We cannot complain here as the consensus will not count here. Thanks. Xpërt3 (talk) 01:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

@Maaz143: Can you get @SuvarnaAdhikari: to send message on the Zakir Naik talk page? She complained with us on our talk page. Assalamualaikum. Xpërt3 (talk) 16:59, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

I'll inform her Maaz143 (talk) 17:02, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Bro now o can't do everything as they changed the editing limited to extended confirm users .. Now it's only you who can save this from propaganda . Maaz143 (talk) 07:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

I am not a extended user Maaz143 (talk) 07:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

@Maaz143:, I have been blocked from editing any article for about 6 days for canvassing, or asking other users to participate in consensus. I seriously was not aware of the fact that it wasn't allowed and I hope this block ends soon, so that I can communicate as to what I can change line by line. I still see some flaws in my version, in which NavjotSR did rightfully show. I cannot reply to him because I'm blocked from editing anything to do with articles and article talk pages. Neutrality must be kept, and these efforts will take a while. I have submitted a unblock request, for which I hope that the admins accept. There have been misunderstandings involved in the situation, in which part of it is my fault and I admit it. Especially with @NavjotSR:, I do want to talk to him about changes because he seems to be open minded about the various changes that can be made. Our position is a little weak right now because of the short amount of sources, but I'm sure that things can be done around here and compromises can be made. Xpërt3 (talk) 01:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Hope so .. Maaz143 (talk) 21:06, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

@Maaz143:, I remember that you were talking about how you belive that Zakir Naik is not a terrorist. So what I did was that I put this statement: "Naik is currently being held as an absconder by the Modi-led government in India on charges of terror financing, hate speech, inciting communal hatred, and money laundering". It is true that Modi's government claims that he is a terrorist, but not all of India believes what Modi believes. Also, I put this: "However, the allegations set out by Modi's government have been criticized by senior Indian officials such as Digvijaya Singh, and organizations such as Interpol have dismissed them." This statement argues that Modi's allegations are not good enough. It is a counterargument, which is allowed on Wikipedia. So basically, I just said that some people believe Naik is a terrorist, while some other people do not, and the allegations set by the people who believe Naik is a terrorist are questionable. I think this is the fairest and the widest flexibility Wikipedia can hold. If you have any other questions, please ask. Xpërt3 (talk) 22:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

True! The BJP and the sold Indian media are trying hard to prove that zakir is a terrorist. They were not having problem since 25 years but when they came to power in 2014 it seems like they're not doing well with naik and declared him a terrorist for polarizing the votes . First they alleged hate speech but cannot prove it then they say money laundering again no proof But when Sri Lankan bombing took place daily Star newspaper quoted zakir is an inspiration and on that basis the govt declared him a terrorist That newspaper on the very next day clarified that zakir has no link with terrorists but the sold Indian media is still on a mission to defame Naik Maaz143 (talk) 11:49, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

I definitely agree about this and I'm glad we made these changes before things could get worse. Anyways, Eid Mubarak to you my brother! Xpërt3 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Eid Mubarak and welcome back! Maaz143 (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

@Maaz143:, I think the article form is in a fair form, and the utterly ridiculous grammar use is gone! Finally! Xpërt3 (talk) 23:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes Hope it maintains the neutrality Maaz143 (talk) 18:38, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hi Xpërt3! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Zakir Naik that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. ArcMachaon (talk) 13:49, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the useful clarification. I did not exactly know the use of minor edits before. I appreciate it. Xpërt3 (talk) 20:45, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Georgethedragonslayer (talk) 07:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Hey can I have some kind of contact like mail or insta of yours ? Maaz143 (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Quotes

Hello Xpert3, thanks for removing the quotes from the article on King Faisal. It's ok to use a few quotes in an article, but generally we try to avoid excessive quotations in Wikipedia articles. If you want to add quotes by someone, they are always welcome at Wikiquote. Thanks, Векочел (talk) 22:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

No problem Векочел! I understood why there was excessive quotation and I appreciate that you pointed that out. Now that you've mentioned it, I'll definitely add quotes to the Wikiquote page. Xpërt3 (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Zakir Naik and Salafism

You said : Article says that Zakir Naik's techniques mimics Salafis, but he does not CLAIM to be one. Rather, it should be mentioned somewhere like, "Zakir Naik does not claim to be an adherent of a particular school of thought in Islam. However, many people consider his views to mimic those of Salafis" , etc. I humbly request you to provide the source where Zakir Naik says he is not adherent of a particular school of thought or sect. Neutralhappy (talk) 19:42, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Sure Neutralhappy, here it is: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOvrh1a7EtQ . Unfortunately, YouTube cannot be used as a Wikipedia source, but this is 100% proof of the reason why I removed "Salafi". I hope this clears this up and I appreciate that you reached out to me about this. Xpërt3 (talk) 03:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

He did NOT say he is not a Salafi or Wahabi or Sunni in it. Rather he said Muslims should not have sects and divisions. Neutralhappy (talk) 04:31, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

This means that he rejects sectarianism within Islam and does not call himself Wahabi or Salafi. So it's inaccurate to say that he is Wahabi or Salafi. Xpërt3 (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Support the statement by @Xpërt3. He don't consider himself as Salafi, Sunni, Wahabi but he always consider himself as ONLY MUSLIM. But there are critics who considers Zakir Naik as Wahabi which is totally wrong. Grabup (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic File:Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)