User talk:Yarik222
Welcome![edit]
Hi Yarik222! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Zefr (talk) 21:47, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
- Dear,
- do not delete or edit my text.
- Most likely, you have little knowledge of the biology and ethology of bees.
- Peer-reviewed journa BeeWorld. It seems strange why you consider him an unreliable source.
- Discovery of bee behavior plays an important role. Prior to this, propolis was regarded as a sticky resin at all stages. It is still liquid, and a new direction is emerging in the study of the wetting of grating and mesh materials during its accumulation. Yarik222 (talk) 10:22, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
December 2022[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Propolis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. It is not clear why your addition needs to be included. It does not impress as a significant factor, the source is incomplete, and the work appears to be your own - see WP:COI. If you wish to debate this, you should open a discussion on the talk page to gain the consensus of other editors, WP:CON. Zefr (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Propolis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Our procedure for resolving disputes is to discuss them on the talk page without warring over article content, WP:WAR. Join the discussion on the talk page to possibly gain WP:CON, and try to provide a review article from a reputable journal for why this information is validated and significant - it does not seem so to me. Zefr (talk) 16:59, 17 December 2022 (UTC)