User talk:Yeager-G300

Welcome!

Hello, Yeager-G300, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Chris Jarrett, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alphageekpa (talk) 13:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chris Jarrett[edit]

A tag has been placed on Chris Jarrett requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alphageekpa (talk) 13:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Jarrett[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Jarrett. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Giant Snowman 08:26, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1: The birthplace is confirmed through CJ's own personal website. No reason to remove it (which you did in the first place!). 2: It is very often seen on Wikipedia that the birthplace comes right after the name and birth date. It makes good sense to me. After all, that's a mere matter of taste. However, talking "vandalism" and "unconstructive edits" is just ridiculous: what did you contribute except putting the birthplace in another line? I started the whole article, in case you missed that. (Yeager-90 (talk) 00:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Nomination of Chris Jarrett for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Jarrett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Jarrett until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—{Canuck lehead} 01:32, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]