User talk:Zefu zungu

This is Zefu zungu's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bmcabana-SF (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bmcabana-SF and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bmcabana-SF, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 11:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zefu zungu! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil 665 11:02, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bmcabana-SF (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove IMDb, and other database entries as they are not reliable sources. Please add additional references from newspapers, magazines (with editorial insights), books etc. to support vanity press. Please read notability criteria for singers, rappers, DJs and other music related articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bmcabana-SF and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bmcabana-SF, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:33, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding inline citations[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

It would be appreciated if you could use inline citations when adding information to Wikipedia. Please see WP:WHYCITE for why this is important.

Editors may remove content they don't find credible if it doesn't have reliable sources provided – see WP:PROVEIT.

By the way, you may find the introduction to policies and guidelines useful.

Thank you. — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 17:17, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bmcabana-SF (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Do not cite IMDb or music stores.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bmcabana-SF and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bmcabana-SF, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:26, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to PdotO, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Xclusivzik (talk) 00:20, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay everything is understood. have a great day Xclusivzik

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Bmcabana SF. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

undrstood McMatter , yes the discussion is taking place, i hope the matter gets resolve soon so that all editors end happy

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you edits and move comments not made by you, which violates policy, i will revert your changes, you can report me if you think your changes to ohter editors comments is justified. You have caused enough trouble. I wont be blocked from following a policy that you dont follow. (08:50 PM 30 July 2021) (CAT)

I did not delete anyone's comments or refactored them I simply moved them to a separate place to continue the off-topic discussion which allowed by policy see WP:TALKOFFTOPIC. What is not allowed is for you to refactor other people's comments to change their meaning or even spell check them. It is also not allowed to outright delete comments as you did on the talk page. It is also not allowed to refactor your own comments without an explanation or a strike through after someone has already replied, because this leads to confusion and doesn't allow for proper flow of the conversation. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 19:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blxckie (July 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blxckie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blxckie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 17:49, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blxckie (July 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notable songs/albums with WP: SIGCOV are required to prove notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blxckie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Blxckie, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 18:33, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bmcabana SF for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bmcabana SF is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bmcabana SF until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:44, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thabo Daniels, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:52, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dee Koala (July 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tamingimpala was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dee Koala and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dee Koala, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 16:11, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dee Koala has been accepted[edit]

Dee Koala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Zefu zungu. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Bmcabana SF, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. We now have evidence you are connected to the subject must abide by the conflict of interest policy. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can read the article yourself, tell me if you find anything promotional or anyhow I'm connected to the subject. The article was written from a neutral point of view. I wrote facts only. It's very offensive of you to accuse me of being connected to the subject, thinking I paid in someway. One thing for sure we know wikipedia edit for free. So say it's a paid promo?while everyone is allowed to contribute, Stop forming editorial advocacy with other editors trying to crush me.you might have succeeded before with such behavior . But not this time. Zefu zungu (talk) 22:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then maybe you would like to explain [1]? According to the messages above you created the page mentioned in the Tweet by the "Official" Twitter of Bmcabana. Your disruption needs to stop and you need to move on to other topics or activities. Any further disruption will be met with appropriate action. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

First of all the link you provided above do make any point...I don't get why you cited it check it and check if it makes sense to your claims..I'm really trying to move with other topic. I have already compiled draft I want to create. But how do I move on when another editor got me under investigation...and nominating my work for AFD Zefu zungu (talk) 22:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting your tweet doesn't change the screenshot I already grabbed of it. Consider this your final warning against any further action including violations of no personal attacks and canvassing as you did with [2]. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 22:52, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can answer for a screenshot you took on another website,like Twitter. I write about subjects, I don't control what they put on their personal website. With the other message on the editors talk page..I was just inviting them to bring their opinion to the discussion...I didn't tell them what say...you also invited Theresnotime to come look to the discussion. I also reached out. If it's done by you ...so is any editor. Zefu zungu (talk) 22:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Stop edit warring over the "autobiography" tag. Sergecross73 msg me 00:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Okay everything understood. Zefu zungu (talk) 01:03, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]